Which was not a reason for the growth of American cities along rivers in the mid-1800s? A. Flowing water could be used to power factories and mills. B. Rivers were economical transportation routes. C. Rivers served as a defensive barrier against disease. D. Natural harbors provided a place to safely dock ships.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

A reason for the growth of American cities along rivers in the mid-1800s does not include option C: Rivers served as a defensive barrier against disease.

What are defense barriers?

The term defense barriers defined as the issues that makes the learning of business environment is more difficult.

During the 1800s, people have to suffered from various losses specially the barriers of different rivers. These type of rivers create a issues against diseases.

Therefore, correct option is C.

Learn more about American cities, refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/975679

Answer 2
Answer: Rivers served as a defensive barrier against disease is not a reason for the growth of American cities along rivers in the mid-1800's.

Related Questions

Who was involved in the case of gibbons v. ogden?
Explain how one small act can have large and far-reaching effects.
What geographic feature is an important waterway connecting the Mediterranean Sea to the red sea?
Why did adam smith insist that a market economy (capitalism) would produce consumer goods more efficiently than a command economy?
what sort of layout should I use to write a "report" on a monument/how should I answer and in what format

How were these pseudo-scientific theories used to justify racist policies and imperialist expansion

Answers

since you didn't specify one, I'll give you a little challenge: global climate change. 

yes...this is not a "historical" answer, but please bear with me as you may learn something quite a bit more useful than a history lesson... 

climate change is a very trendy topic now....and many of its proponents are absolutely convinced of its "science".. 

...however, for many this absoute faith in the "science" translates all-too-easily into an absolute faith in the righteousness of the proposed "solutions"... 

...for example, president obama recently celebrated his participation in a "landmark" international accord to combat climate change... many of his supporters lauded him for "taking a stand against global corporations and their exploitation of people and natural resources..." 

great.... right? 

this agreement contained two provisions that seemingly went unnoticed.... first, nations considered "developing" will not have to comply with the strict emmisions restrictions... second, all nations are required to designate a certain percentage of their natural forests & jungles as untouchable "preserves." 

sounds good.... right? please think it through... 

the agreement gives these nations the authority to displace any indigenous peoples who just happen to call those "preserves" home... over a million people are expected to be kicked off their ancestral lands in DR Congo alone. 

keep in mind that most of these people will be illiterate hunter-gatherers ... how do you think they will manage to support themselves? 

guess what? because those nations will not be required to meet environmental standards, a bunch of new factories, mines and refineries are sure to open up there....and they'll have all the cheap labor they could ever need! Yay! 

and guess who owns those businesses? that's right, mega-corporations...guess who those corporations support? that's right... the very politicians who signed the climate change deal! 

so you were asking about how "pseudo science" supports/justifies exploitation and imperialism? well....as the old rhyme goes: the wheels on the bus keep on going 'round and 'round... don't they?

which former multinational state is now divided into seven independent states, including Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia, Bosnia, and Herzegovina?

Answers

These countries all used to be a part of Yugoslavia before it broke up in 2006.

Kemal organized nationalists to take control of the government and eliminated the

Answers

Mustafa Kemal organized nationalists to take control of the government and eventually eliminated the Ottoman Sultanate. The Ottoman Sultanate was officially eliminated in November of 1922.

Question 1 (Multiple Choice Worth 10 points)(08.03)Carlton is using the following data samples to make a claim about the house values in his neighborhood:


House A= $100,000
House B= $600,000
House C=$650,000
House D=$700,000
House E =$900,000




Based on the data, should Carlton use the mean or the median to make an inference about the house values in his neighborhood?

He should use the median because there is an outlier that affects the mean.

He should use the mean because there are no outliers that affect the mean.

He should use the mean because it is in the center of the data.

He should use the median because it is in the center of the data.







Question 2 (Multiple Choice Worth 10 points)


(08.03)Magdeline wants to know if the number of words on a page in her art book is generally more than the number of words on a page in her science book. She takes a random sample of 25 pages in each book and then calculates the mean, median, and mean absolute deviation for the 25 samples of each book.


Art:
Mean = 68.7
Median=50
Mean Absolute Deviation= 15.4


Science:
Mean= 54.2
Median= 55
Mean Absolute Deviation=7 .9


She claims that because the mean number of words on each page in the art book is greater than the mean number of words on each page in the science book, the art book has more words per page. Based on the data, is this a valid inference?

Yes, because the mean is larger in the art book

No, because the mean is larger in the art book

Yes, because there is a lot of variability in the art book data

No, because there is a lot of variability in the art book data

Answers

Part 1 : Carlton is using the following data samples to make a claim about the house values in his neighborhood:

House A= $100,000

House B= $600,000

House C=$650,000

House D=$700,000

House E =$900,000


Based on the data, should Carlton use the mean or the median to make an inference about the house values in his neighborhood?

He should use the median because there is an outlier that affects the mean.

He should use the mean because there are no outliers that affect the mean.

He should use the mean because it is in the center of the data.

He should use the median because it is in the center of the data. 

Solutions = We know that Option A is an Outlier because 100,000 is a big difference from the other values. Therefore, the mean is inaccurate. 

Answer = 
He should use the median because there is an outlier that affects the mean. 

Part 2 : 
Magdeline wants to know if the number of words on a page in her art book is generally more than the number of words on a page in her science book. She takes a random sample of 25 pages in each book and then calculates the mean, median, and mean absolute deviation for the 25 samples of each book. 


Art:
Mean = 68.7
Median=50
Mean Absolute Deviation= 15.4


Science: 
Mean= 54.2
Median= 55
Mean Absolute Deviation=7 .9 


She claims that because the mean number of words on each page in the art book is greater than the mean number of words on each page in the science book, the art book has more words per page. Based on the data, is this a valid inference?

Yes, because the mean is larger in the art book

No, because the mean is larger in the art book

Yes, because there is a lot of variability in the art book data

No, because there is a lot of variability in the art book data 

Solutions : 
She claims that because the mean number of words on each page in the art book is greater than the mean number of words on each page in the science book, the art book has more words per page.

We know that 
there are a lot pictures, relating to paintings of painters in the art book, whereas into a science book, book there are not many pictures. There are examples but barely any pictures. Therefore the correct answer is the last one. 

Slave laws in the southern colonies in the 1600s

Answers

they werent allowed to sleep in the same houses as their bosses

slaves didnt choose for themselves who they wanted to work for

slaves werent allowed to get married

Answer:

they weren't allowed to sleep in the same houses as their masters  

slaves didn't choose for themselves who they wanted to work for

slaves weren't allowed to get married

Explanation:

What was New Harmony, Indiana?a successful factory town
a community of escaped enslaved persons
a model utopian community
a community for religious dissident

Answers

New Harmony, Indiana is a model utopian community.

New Harmony is the site of not just one, but two early American utopian communities. The Harmony Society, led by George Rapp, arrived in the United States in 1804 and settled in Pennsylvania before purchasing 20,000 acres on the Wabash River and moving to Indiana in 1814. Established by the Harmony Society in 1814 under the leadership of George Rapp, the town was originally known as Harmony (also called Harmonie, or New Harmony). In its early years, the 20,000-acre (8,100 ha) settlement was the home of Lutherans who had separated from the official church in the Duchy of Württemberg and immigrated to the United States. The Harmonists built a new town in the wilderness, but in 1824 they decided to sell their property and return to Pennsylvania. Robert Owen, a Welsh industrialist, and social reformer purchased the town in 1825 with the intention of creating a new utopian community and renamed it, New Harmony. The Owenite social experiment failed two years after it began.

Learn more about American society here: brainly.com/question/13323062

#SPJ4

Answer:

c. a model utopian community

Explanation: