Answer: Aaron Ogden and Thomas Gibbons
Explanation:
John Marshall’s last great decision, Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), established national supremacy in regulating interstate commerce. In 1808, Robert Fulton and Robert R. Livingston (Jefferson’s minister to France in 1801), who pioneered commercial use of the steamboat, won from the New York legislature the exclusive right to operate steamboats on the state’s rivers and lakes. Fulton and Livingston then gave Aaron Ogden the exclusive right to navigate the Hudson River between New York and New Jersey. Thomas Gibbons, however, operated ships under a federal license that competed with Ogden. On behalf of a unanimous Court, Marshall ruled that the monopoly granted by the state to Ogden conflicted with the federal Coasting Act, under which Gibbons operated.
Congressional power to regulate commerce, the Court said, “like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution.”
B. A treaty between Athens and Sparta
C. A shaky truce between Athens and Sparta
D. The defeat of Athens
The answer is D. because the Athens were starving and had no choice but to surrender to Sparta.
2. What were the main provisions of the law? Explain at least four provisions.
3. Explain at least two shortcomings of the law.
4. Given what you know about the Voting Rights Act of 1960, do you think that the law was effective? Why or why not?
Remember to use correct spelling, grammar, and conventions.
Answer:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most significant civil rights legislation since the Reconstruction era.
1. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The law was similar to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 in that it aimed to protect the voting rights of African Americans.
2. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 had several key provisions, including:
3. Two shortcomings of the law were:
4. It is worth noting that there was no Voting Rights Act of 1960. However, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a significant piece of legislation that aimed to address the shortcomings of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 regarding voting rights. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was highly effective in dismantling barriers to voting that had been used to disenfranchise African Americans in the South. By eliminating discriminatory practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes, the law paved the way for greater participation by African Americans in the political process.
Nativism is the political policy of promoting the interests of native inhabitants against those of immigrants. However, this is currently more commonly described as an immigration restriction position. In scholarly studies nativism is a standard technical term. The term is typically not accepted by those who hold this political view
trump not letting in immigrants
improving education in rural areas.
protecting the right to strike.
restricting employment of foreigners.
Answer:
Mexico’s Constitution of 1917 helped the working class by protecting the right to strike.
Explanation:
The Mexican National Constitution of 1917 elevated to the constitutional rank the rights of the workers, establishing and regulating the right to strike, the eight-hour labor day, the fixing of a minimum wage, distribution of profits, security measures, dismissal for justified reasons, protection of mothers, abolition of debt peonage, mechanisms of arbitration to resolve conflicts between labor and capital and other stipulations, which made Article 123 the most advanced constitutional article of the time.
Mexico’s Constitution of 1917 helped the working class by protecting the right to strike.
The constitution of Mexico was set up 1917, and has been amended a lot of times.
It is one that guarantees some measures of freedoms and civil liberties and also set up economic and political rules for the country.
Learn more about Mexico from
please Answer