Yes, 3/5 and 6/10 are equivalent fractions.
A fraction is defined as a numerical representation of a part of a whole that represents a rational number.
Arithmetic operations can also be specified by adding, subtracting, dividing, and multiplying built-in functions.
* Multiplication operation: Multiplies values on either side of the operator
For example 4*2 = 8
We have been given that fractions 3/5 and 6/10
By multiplying the fraction by the same numerator and denominator, equivalent fractions can be determined.
Here the same numerator and denominator is 2 i.e. 2/2
⇒ 3/5 × 2/2 = 6/10.
Therefore, 3/5 and 6/10 are equivalent fractions.
Learn more about the fractions here:
#SPJ2
* I know you have to set it up like a proportion i just dont know how to solve.
A.
–168
B.
–3
C.
17
D.
168
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
Try 1, 2, 3, or 4 blue pencils. Then green is 6 times as many. Red must be the rest to make up 20 total.
No. of blue No. of green No. of red
1 6 13
2 12 6
3 18 -1
You can't have 3 blue pencils because 3 blue + 18 green = 21 pencils, and there are only 20.
If you have 1 blue and 6 green, then there must be 13 red, but red must be less than green, and 13 is not less than 6.
The only possibility is
2 blue, 12 green, 6 red
If you start taking out pencils, when you take out the first 14 they may be all blues or green, so only when you take out the 15th pencil do you know for sure there must be 1 green pencil.
{y+7=3x
6x−2y=12
(14, 12)
(12, 14)
There is no solution.
There are an infinite number of solutions.
=============================
Work Shown:
y+7 = 3x turns into y = 3x-7 after we subtract 7 from both sides
Plug that into the other equation and solve for x
------
6x - 2y = 12
6x - 2( y ) = 12
6x - 2( 3x-7 ) = 12 ... y replaced with 3x-7
6x - 2(3x) - 2(-7) = 12
6x - 6x + 14 = 12
0x + 14 = 12
0 + 14 = 12
14 = 12 ... this is a contradiction, aka false statement
------
No matter what x value we pick, the equation above will always be false.
Therefore, there are no solutions
We say that this system of equations is inconsistent.
Graphing both equations leads to two parallel lines. A solution only happens if the lines cross, but parallel lines never intersect.
Answer:
the answer is D
Step-by-step explanation:
Sorry if i get it wrong
The ordered list from least to greatest using the absolute values would be: |-1 1/8|, |-1.5|, |-2 1/2|, |-2.4|, |-3|.
The student is asking to order a series of numbers from least to greatest. The numbers given are in absolute values. Absolute value refers to the distance of a number from zero, disregarding whether it is negative or positive. Therefore, the |-2.4| signifies the absolute value of -2.4, which is 2.4. Similarly, the other numbers convert to 1.5, 2.5, 3, and 1.125 respectively.
To answer this question, we must understand that the smaller the absolute value, the closer the number is to zero. Hence, the order from smallest (or least) to largest (or greatest) would be: |-1 1/8|, |-1.5|, |-2 1/2|, |-2.4|, |-3| .
#SPJ2