Answer:
parliament
i believe the options are
A)Congress
B)Parliament
C)House of Lords
D)House of Commons
Answer:
B.)
Explanation:
a. True
b. False
Frank O. Gehry
Judy Pfaff
the answer to this question is Brian McSweeney
Answer:
All evidence found would have to be thrown out because her rights were infringed. The police had no right to enter or search her home.
If I were a justice for the Supreme Court of Ohio, I would find the search of Mapp's house to be unreasonable for a few reasons.
If I were a justice for the Supreme Court of Ohio, I would find the search of Mapp's house to be unreasonable for a few reasons. First, the search was conducted without a valid search warrant. The Fourth Amendment requires that searches be based on probable cause and authorized by a warrant, unless there are specific exceptions. In this case, the police did not have a warrant and there were no exigent circumstances.
Second, the evidence obtained during the search was a result of an illegal search and seizure. The exclusionary rule, established by the Supreme Court, states that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in a criminal trial. Since the search of Mapp's house was conducted without a warrant, any evidence obtained during that search would likely be considered inadmissible.
Lastly, the search of Mapp's house was conducted in a manner that violated her privacy rights. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the search of Mapp's house without a warrant or probable cause would likely be considered an invasion of her privacy.
#SPJ2
Ferdinand and Isabella, the king and queen of Spain
Francois and Iris, the king and queen of France
Answer:
Under the Dawes Act of 1887, if indigenous people accepted the provisions, they could obtain individual land ownership and U.S. citizenship. The act aimed to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American society by dividing communal tribal lands into individual allotments. However, it resulted in the loss of significant tribal lands and cultural disruption for many indigenous communities. It's important to note that the Dawes Act has been widely criticized for its negative impact on Native American communities.