Answer:
1) 32/5
2) 19/8
3) 34/7
4) 25/3
How to do this
You take the denominator (the number on the bottom), multiply it by the whole number (like in 1, 5*6=30) then add the numerator (the top number) (so 30+2) then add on top of the denominator before you changed anything (32/5)
We can take the following example-
1. Rachael bought 10 yards of spool of ribbon. She cut 1/5 yd of ribbon from the spool in the morning. In the afternoon she again cut 7/10 yd of ribbon from the spool. How much ribbon is left?
2. Kim is icing 30 cupcakes. She spreads mint icing on 1/5 of the cupcakes and chocolate on 1/2 of the remaining cupcakes. The rest she spreads with vanilla frosting. How many cupcakes have vanilla frosting?
what is the first step?
Answer:
by dividing answer is 6m-1
Answer:
its the third option
Step-by-step explanation:
the one with 2 rings on the second longest angle 2 lines on longest side one side and 1 line on the shortest side
All the described pairs of triangles that are reflected, rotated, or both, can be proven congruent by the SAS postulate because such rigid transformations preserve the congruency of sides and angles.
To determine which pair of triangles can be proven congruent by the SAS (Side-Angle-Side) postulate, we look for two sides of a triangle and the included angle that are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle. When a triangle is reflected across a line, rotated 90 degrees, or both reflected and rotated, it maintains its size and shape, thus the corresponding sides and angles remain congruent.
A reflection or rotation (including a combination of both) is a type of rigid transformation which preserves the size and shape of figures. Hence, all the given pairs of triangles can be proven congruent to the original triangle through the SAS postulate, as rigid transformations do not alter the congruity of sides and included angles.
#SPJ3