Based on the accrual method, the correct entry for $10,000 worth of services would be a debit to accounts receivable for $10,000 and a credit to Sales revenue for $10,000.
The company has performed a certain service for a customer and hasn't been paid for it. The customer therefore owes the company which makes them an account receivable.
The $10,000 will be considered revenue by the company so they will credit the revenue account. Accounts Receivables are assets so this account will be debited.
Find out more on accounts receivables at brainly.com/question/24871345.
The company should debit (increase) the Accounts Receivable account by $10,000 and credit (increase) the Service Revenue account by $10,000. This follows the accrual method of accounting, in which revenues and expenses are recorded when they are earned and incurred, respectively.
The correct entry to record this transaction, using the accrual method, involves two accounts: Accounts Receivable and Service Revenue. Here is the step-by-step process of recording this transaction.
#SPJ6
Answer:
the correct answer is C
good luck ❤
Answer:
As a result of the technology change, the price of pollution will be same as price of pollution with pollution permits.
The quantity of pollution with corrective tax will be lower than quantity of pollution with pollution permits.
Explanation:
The pollution permits are issued to reduce pollution by firms. The companies will reduce the pollution and will only be able to emit pollution up to certain limit. The price of pollution with corrective tax will be same as the price of pollution with pollution permits.
The change in technology will effect an increase in the price of pollution due to the increased cost of production factoring in the social cost of pollution, hence shifting the supply curve upward. The quantity of pollution will decrease as firms adopt cheaper technologies for pollution reduction influenced by the corrective tax policy and pollution permits.
The subject of your question is concerned with corrective tax policy and pollution permits in the context of a market economy under the influence of advances in technology. Under the original conditions before the social costs of pollution are taken into account, the equilibrium was met at a pollution price of $15 with a quantity of 440. However, once the external cost of pollution has been factored in, the supply curve shifts upward, creating a new equilibrium at a price of $30 and a quantity of 410, indicating an increase in the cost of pollution and a decrease in its quantity.
These policy instruments (corrective tax and pollution permits) induce companies to invest in technologies that reduce pollution higher costs of pollution as a result of the corrective tax motivate firms to seek cheaper technologies for pollution reduction. Those with less costly ways of lessening pollution will do so to reduce their tax expense, while those who would incur large costs in doing so would opt to pay the tax. The option of pollution permits introduces a marketplace where firms can purchase the right to pollute, the cost of which is again a motivator for firms to reduce pollution. Consequently, the demand for pollution permits among firms will influence their pricing. Firms that can reduce pollution at lower costs will do so the most. With no change in demand for pollution permits or corrective tax policies, the price of pollution will change as a result of the conditions set by these policies, and the quantity will change according to the adoption of more efficient technology.
#SPJ11
Direct labor (variable) $3.50
Variable manufacturing overhead $1.00
Fixed manufacturing overhead $4.00
Total unit cost $14.50
This special order would require an investment of $10,000 for the molds required for the extra-large trees. These molds would have no other purpose and would have no salvage value. The special order trees would also have an additional variable cost of $6.00 per unit associated with having a white tree. This special order would not have any effect on the company's other sales.
Should Apex accept the order? What is the effect on net operating income of accepting the order?
Answer:
It is profitable to accept the special offer.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The shopping mall would like to purchase 200 extra-large white trees. Apex Company has the excess capacity to handle this special order. The shopping mall has offered to pay $120 for each tree.
Variable costs:
Direct materials $50.00
Direct labor (variable) $3.50
Variable manufacturing overhead $1.00
Additional variable cost= $6
This special order would require an investment of $10,000 for the molds required for the extra-large trees.
Because it is a special offer and there is unused capacity, we will not have into account the fixed costs (except the incremental fixed cost).
Unitary variable cost= 50 + 3.5 + 1 + 6= $60.5
Fixed costs= 10,000
Incremental income= (200*120) - (200*60.5) - 10,000= $1,900
It is profitable to accept the special offer.
Answer: It is Voidable
Explanation:
Samuel took advantage of his fiduciary responsibility is taking care of Juan to unfairly influence him to sell him a piece of land at a price 35% below market price. Juan as an old man who is TOTALLY dependant on Samuel, felt he had no choice but to agree as failure to do so will lead to Samuel no longer taking care of him and this could be quite disadvantageous to him.
There was UNDUE INFLUENCE and Coercion in this scenario which means Voluntary consent was lacking.
For this reason, the contract can be voided.
Answer:
The percent change in labor productivity is 22%
Explanation:
Listing out the parameters given:
labor productivity (2009) = 3.33 units/hr,
labor productivity (2010) = 4.27 units/hr
To calculate the percent change in labor productivity, we have it thu:
percent change in labor productivity = [labor productivity (2010) - labor productivity (2009)] ÷ labor productivity (2010)
Let's assume 'Labor productivity' = LP
%Δ in LP = * 100% = * 100%
%Δ in LP = * 100% = 22%
%Δ in LP = 22%
This shows an increase in computer manufacturing from 2009 to 2010 by 22%
Answer:
percentage change in labor productivity = 28.23%
Explanation:
In 2009 the computer manufacturer had a labor productivity of 3.33 units per labor hour. In 2010 the productivity increased to 4.27 units per labor hour.
The percentage change in labor productivity can be calculated as
change in labor productivity = New labor productivity - Old labor productivity
percentage change in labor productivity = change in labor productivity/old labor productivity × 100
Old labor productivity = 3.33 unit
New labor productivity = 4.27 unit
change in labor productivity = 4.27 - 3.33 = 0.94
percentage change in labor productivity = 0.94/3.33 × 100
percentage change in labor productivity = 94/3.33
percentage change in labor productivity = 28.2282282282
percentage change in labor productivity = 28.23%
Mar. 9 Paid the amount owed on the invoice within the discount period.
Mar. 11 Discovered that $18,000 of the merchandise purchased on March 1 was defective and returned items, receiving credit for $17,640 [$18,000 − ($18,000 × 2%)].
Mar. 18 Purchased $10,000 of merchandise from Wright Co. on account, terms n/30.
Mar. 20 Received a refund from Wright Co. for return on Mar. 11 less the purchase on Mar. 18.
Answer:
See explanation section.
Explanation:
March 1, Purchased Debit $90,000
Accounts payable Credit $90,000
Note: To record the purchased on account.
March 9, Accounts payable Debit $90,000
Cash Credit $88,200
Purchased discount Credit $1,800
Calculation: $90,000 - ($90,000 × 2%) = $88,200
Note: To record the payment.
March 11, No journal entry required.
March 18, Purchased Debit $10,000
Accounts payable Credit $10,000
Note: To record the purchased on account.
March 20, Cash Debit $17,640
Refunds payable Credit $17,640
Note: To record the return.
The journal entries are indicated for each transaction during March, highlighting purchases on account, payment within discount period, return of defective goods, a second purchase, and a refund received. The entries show how these transactions are reflected in the accounting system of Manville Heating & Air Company.
The journal entries for the transactions of Manville Heating & Air Company in the month of March are as follows:
The above journal entries demonstrate the recording of purchasing transactions and returns, considering the discount period and the eventual refund received.
#SPJ3