A laissez-faire government approach to the economy is based on the ideas of __________. A.
socialism
B.
communism
C.
traditionalism
D.
capitalism

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: A laissez-faire government approach to the economy is based on the ideas of D) capitalism. Laissez-faire or a hands off approach posits that an economy will function best without the interference of government or regulation. 
Answer 2
Answer:

Correct answer:  D. capitalism

Further detail:

The terminology of "laissez-faire" has been used in economics since the 18th century Enlightenment era.  "Laissez-faire" is French for "let do."  You can think of it as letting the economy do its own thing, without governments trying to interfere with it or control it.  This was an idea promoted by the Physiocrats in 18th century France.  They called themselves "Physiocrats" (those who believed in "rule by nature") because they thought trade and commerce should be allowed to proceed naturally.

The Scottish philosopher Adam Smith picked up on this idea also and promoted a capitalist economy in opposition to what he called a "mercantilist" economy where governments gave monopolies to certain merchants and tried to control business affairs.  


Related Questions

Create an advertisement that Stephen F. Austin might have to convince colonists to move to Texas
what was accomplished by the members of the Second Continental Congress during their meeting in Philadelphia
The United States and the United Nations successfully restored peace in Somalia in the 1990s.
The bitterness left behind in parts of Europe by the Treaty of Versailles contributed to the rise of?
What was one of the most important effects of the War of 1812

Why did some feminists criticize Friedan for ideas in The Second Stage?

Answers

Some feminists criticized Betty Friedan for her ideas in "The Second Stage" because they believed that her emphasis on women's traditional roles undermined the broader goals of gender equality, excluding the experiences of marginalized women and neglecting the intersectional aspects of feminism.

Some feminists criticized Betty Friedan for her ideas in "The Second Stage" because they felt that her focus on women's roles within the traditional family structure perpetuated gender norms and failed to address the broader systemic issues that marginalized women face.

They argued that her emphasis on the nuclear family as the primary site of women's fulfillment ignored the diverse experiences and needs of women, particularly those from marginalized communities.

These critics believed that Friedan's approach ignored the intersectional aspects of feminism and called for a more inclusive and intersectional feminism that tackled multiple forms of oppression and prioritized the voices and concerns of all women.

For more such questions on Betty Friedan:

brainly.com/question/3406842

#SPJ8

How did the media shape public perception of the Vietnam War? Reporters frequently attacked Johnson over his administration's failed policies. For the first time, people saw up-to-date news coverage of war on television. Newspapers refused to cover events that might show the war in a negative light. Protestors published magazines and appeared on television to explain their message.

Answers

"For the first time, people saw up-to-date news coverage of war on television" is the best answer in terms of how the media shape public perception of the Vietnam War.

Answer:

B. For the first time, people saw up-to-date news coverage of war on television.

Explanation:

Please helpp!!!!
In what way did the Americans break the rules of the 18th century warfare?

Answers

Final answer:

Americans broke the rules of 18th century warfare through guerrilla tactics, irregular units, and unconventional weapons and tactics.

Explanation:

In the 18th century, Americans broke the rules of warfare in several ways. One major way was through the use of guerrilla tactics during the American Revolutionary War. Instead of engaging in traditional open-field battles, American forces used hit-and-run tactics, ambushes, and sniping to disrupt and weaken the British army. This unconventional approach was highly effective against the heavily regimented and predictable British forces.

Another way Americans broke the rules of 18th century warfare was through the use of irregular and partisan units, such as militias. These units, composed of citizen-soldiers, played a critical role in the American Revolution. They relied on local knowledge, flexible maneuvering, and surprise attacks to undermine British control and achieve strategic objectives.

Lastly, Americans also challenged the rules of warfare by using unconventional weapons and tactics. For example, American privateers, privately-owned armed ships, targeted British merchant vessels during the Revolutionary War, disrupting British supply chains and weakening their economy. This asymmetrical approach to warfare helped tip the scales in favor of the American revolutionaries.

Learn more about Americans broke the rules of 18th century warfare here:

brainly.com/question/31842109

#SPJ11

Answer: Hello. America did not ‘break’ the rules but here are a few things you may be looking for.

Explanation: English officers bought their commissions, America had no aristocracy, so commissions were based mostly on ability, experience and connections.

Targeting officers.

Use of militias.

Use of Irregular forces. Lining one’s soldiers in a row

standing up

marching them towards the enemy soldiers

standing in a line marching towards your soldiers

No hiding behind trees allowed!

What does Patrick Henry say the colonists choices are at the start of his speech?

Answers

Patrick Henry is  urging the  colonists to raise a militia  that could oppose the British army. 

what sort of layout should I use to write a "report" on a monument/how should I answer and in what format

Answers

MLA format is the best and what i had to use for everything in my English 11 

In the 1920s, the danger of buying stock on margin was that if the value of the stock dropped, borrowershad to make up the difference.
lost ownership of the stock.
could no longer speculate on stock.
could no longer get credit.

Answers

In the 1920s, the danger of buying stock on margin was that if the value of the stock dropped the borrowers had to make up the difference, so the correct option is (a).

In the 1920s, the world was just coping with WW1, the economy was in a major slowdown. The demand was soaring High and the supply was not that much as a result prices increased and due to war United was in a horrifying condition.

The biggest risk of buying a stock was that you could loose all the money that you had initially invested. There was a major decline of 50%, and rest was all eaten up by the banks. Which resulted in the loss of 100%.

Hence, In the 1920s, the danger of buying stock on margin was that if the value of the stock dropped the borrowers had to make up the difference, so the correct option is (a).

To know more about buying stocks in the 1920s, visit here:

brainly.com/question/16924132

#SPJ5

A.) had to make up the difference