Answer:
Because I remembered to study
Explanation:
A subordinate clause allows you to add extra information to a simple sentence using subordinating conjunction to turn it into a complex sentence.
The subordinate clause always depends on another clause for its full meaning. The subordinating conjunctions show the relationship between the two clauses.
Therefore this shows that : ' because I remembered to study ' is the subordinating clause as it adds extra information on how the person aced there test.
Answer:
because I remembered to study
Explanation:
theme
conflict
denouement
A story's deeper meaning is called it's theme.
b) In "after twenty years." "silky" bob is looking for his old friend Jimmy.
c) In "The secret life of Walter Mitty," Mitty imagines that he is a great surgeon.
d) In "The Lottery." Tessie is stoned to death by her neighbors.
Answer:
B: abstract, singular, common is the answer
transform, morphology, phoneme
syntactic, structural, generative
The correct answer is A. Normative, semantic, logical
Explanation:
The word linguistics refer to the study of language and the elements that are part of it, because of this, there are different approaches including the traditional and the structural approaches that aim at understanding language from different perspectives. In the case of the traditional approach, it was believed language was composed of fixed structures that could be applied in all cases. On the other hand, the structural approach understood language as a structure that can be described by understanding the units that composed it which are not fixed but varies according to multiple linguistic elements.
Due to this, structural linguistics criticized the traditional linguistics in terms of grammar as they believed there were multiple fallacies or incorrect ideas in considering grammar from the perspective traditional linguistics did. This included the normative fallacy as in traditional grammar there are standards for using the language, but according to structural linguistics language change and there are no static norms for it; the semantic fallacy as in traditional grammar the study of language is guided the meaning of words, but for structural linguistics this was not precise or objective and the logical fallacy as traditional grammar supported the idea of universal laws that could be applied to all languages but structural linguistics believed this was not true.
Thus, the three types of fallacies that structural linguistics find in traditional grammar were the normative, the semantic and the logical considering the beliefs of structural linguistics about these three concepts were opposite to the beliefs of linguistics of traditional grammar and due to this, they called these fallacies or false ideas.