Answer:
Yea I DEFINETLY would ;)
Answer:
Jainism was a reaction to Hinduism.
I think that's the answer.
Answer:
reaction to is the answer
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Political deviance
Explanation:
The word "deviance" describes actions against the norms established in a society, institution, community, etc. In the case of political deviance, this occurs when individuals display inappropriate behaviors that go against the politics of an organization this includes practices such as bullying, favoritism, being unrespectful to others, etc. Additionally, in this type of deviance behaviors are not addressed to only one person which would be personal aggression.
According to this, showing favoritism, gossiping, blaming workers, etc. is part of political deviance because these behaviors go against the politics of fairness, respect, and similar in an organization. Also, this cannot be classified as personal aggression, property deviance or deviance production because these types of deviance involve other aspects rather than the politics in an organization.
Edison: I think a switch from the income tax to a consumption tax would bring growth in living standards.
Hilary: You really think households would change their saving behavior enough in response to this to make a difference? Because I don't.
The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to ______.
(A) differences in values
(B) differences in perception versus reality
(C) differences in scientific judgments
Answer: The difference between the two economist are "differences in perception versus reality". That means option B is most correct.
Explanation: The difference in their perception versus reality, means how their want to interpret things against how things really are.
Harry interpret his understanding, that the way people save their house hold is becoming lower than what it use to be, to improve the standard of living. Though he doesn't believe consumption of household product is the factor to be controlled to achieve an improvement in the standard of living. While Edison interprets his that, if tax is applied more in consumption, it will help reduce the rate of consumption of households products, which will help them to save more, thereby increasing their standard of living.
Harry views household consumption as a real factor of standard of living that has been affected due to a cause. While Edison views household consumption as the real cause, which has to be worked on, to achieve a growth in standard of living.
Answer:
The correct answer is Regents v. Bakke