I could and would work hard to improve my situation sentence from "the pin" best supports the optimistic tone in the story. Therefore option A is correct.
An optimist hopes for the best outcome even though they know it is unlikely to occur. This type of person is also sometimes referred to as optimistic. If you choose to look on the bright side of things and see the glass as half-full when others see it as half-empty, you are optimistic.
An optimist prefers to view things positively and hold out hope for the better, which is known as the "half-full" perspective. Instead of believing that something will happen either always or never, they choose to consider the possibilities.
A pessimist is the exact opposite of an optimist. A pessimist has a tendency to view things negatively and prepare for the worst, which implies they tend to see the glass as half-empty. A pessimist will therefore frequently worry more than an optimist!
To learn more about Optimistic Tone follow the link.
#SPJ3
A. I could and would work hard to improve my situation
consequently
neither . . . nor
likewise
2.Which joiner shows a result between coordinate ideas?
nor
yet
therefore
also
Answer: Representative
Explanation:
B stop sleeping
C generate art
D stir up
E incite anger
Read the following passage carefully before you choose your answers.
(The following is an excerpt from A Man of Letters as a Man of Business by
William Dean Howells.)
I think that every man ought to work for his living, without exception, and that when he has once avouched his willingness to work, society should provide him with work and warrant him a living. I do not think any man ought to live by an art. A man’s art should be his privilege, when he has proven his fitness to exercise it, and has otherwise earned his daily bread; and its results should be free to all. There is an instinctive sense of this, even in the midst of the grotesque confusion of our economic being; people feel that there is something profane, something impious, in taking money for a picture, or a poem, or a statue. Most of all, the artist himself feels this. He puts on a bold front with the world, to be sure, and brazens it out as business; but he knows very well that there is something false and vulgar in it; and that the work which cannot be truly priced in money cannot be truly paid in money.
He can, of course, say that the priest takes money for reading the marriage service, for christening the new-born babe, and for saying the last office for the dead; that the physician sells healing; that justice itself is paid for; and that he is merely a party to the thing that is and must be. He can say that, as the thing is, unless he sells his art he cannot live, that society will leave him to starve if he does not hit its fancy in a picture, or a poem, or a statue; and all this is bitterly true. He is, and he must be, only too glad if there is a market for his wares. Without a market for his wares he must perish, or turn to making something that will sell better than pictures, or poems, or statues. All the same, the sin and the shame remain, and the averted eye sees them still, with its inward vision. Many will make believe otherwise, but I would rather not make believe otherwise; and in trying to write of Literature as Business I am tempted to begin by saying that Business is the opprobrium of Literature.
Literature is at once the most intimate and the most articulate of the arts. It cannot impart its effect through the senses or the nerves as the other arts can; it is beautiful only through the intelligence; it is the mind speaking to the mind; until it has been put into absolute terms, of an invariable significance, it does not exist at all. It cannot awaken this emotion in one, and that in another; if it fails to express precisely the meaning of the author, it says nothing, and is nothing. So that when a poet has put his heart, much or little, into a poem, and sold it to a magazine, the scandal is greater than when a painter has sold a picture to a patron, or a sculptor has modeled a statue to order. These are artists less articulate and less intimate than the poet; they are more exterior to their work. They are less personally in it.
If it will serve to make my meaning a little clearer we will suppose that a poet has been crossed in love, or has suffered some real sorrow, like the loss of a wife or child. He pours out his broken heart in verse that shall bring tears of sacred sympathy from his readers, and an editor pays him a hundred dollars for the right of bringing his verse to their notice. It is perfectly true that the poem was not written for these dollars, but it is perfectly true that it was sold for them.
The poet must use his emotions to pay his bills; he has no other means. Society does not propose to pay his bills for him. Yet, and at the end of the ends, the unsophisticated witness finds the transaction ridiculous, finds it repulsive, finds it shabby. Somehow he knows that if our huckstering civilization did not at every moment violate the eternal fitness of things, the poet’s song would have been given to the world, and the poet would have been cared for by the whole human brotherhood, as any man should be who does the duty that every man owes it.
Answer:
The word "awaken" in the third paragraph most nearly means 'stir up'.
The correct answer is D)
Explanation:
The writer cleverly uses a a literary device in that sentence called Logos and at the centre of it is the synonym of 'arouse' or 'stir up'.
Cheers!
A True Relation
"A Progress to the Mines"
The Diary of Samuel Pepys
Someone interested in reading a personal account of life under Nazi dominance would choose The Diary of Anne Frank. Option A is correct.
The Diary of a Young Girl, typically refered to as The Diary of Anne Frank, is a book of the writings from the diary kept by Anne Frank during her time in hiding for two years along with her family during the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands. The family was apprehended in 1944, and she passed away of typhus in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in 1945.
The sentences should be: 'Does the music start at 4:00 or 4:30?' inquired Ms. Clark. Mistakes included a misspelled word, incorrect formatting of time, and missing punctuation.
The correct versions of the sentence are: "Does the music start at 4:00 or 4:30?" inquired Ms. Clark. There were several mistakes in the original sentences: the misspelling of "does", the use of numbers instead of words to denote time, and the absence of punctuation to mark the end of the question.
To correct the sentences, Ms. Clark would need to ask, 'Does the music start at 400 or 430?' She should use the verb 'does' instead of 'dose', and she should use a question mark at the end of the sentence. Additionally, she could improve the clarity of the question by specifying the time as either 4:00 or 4:30. For example, 'Does the music start at 4:00 or 4:30?'
#SPJ2
your blood circulate