The true statement about the juan and lisa is Juan made a higher rate of pay than Lisa.
Juan made a lower rate of pay because he made less money.
This statement is false. Juan and Lisa made a similar rate of pay per hour ($14.80 and $14.00 respectively).
Lisa made a better rate of pay because she made more money.
This statement is false. The total earnings do not determine the rate of pay; the hourly rate does.
Lisa said she made a better rate of pay because her rate was $14 an hour.
This statement is false. Lisa's actual rate was $14.00 per hour, not $14.00 as stated.
Juan said he made a better rate of pay because he was paid $14.80 an hour.
This statement is true. Juan's hourly rate was $14.80, which is higher than Lisa's rate of $14.00 per hour.
To calculate the rate of pay, we divide the money earned by the hours worked.
Juan's rate of pay is $37.00 / 2.5 hours = $14.80 per hour.
Lisa's rate of pay is $42.00 / 3 hours = $14.00 per hour.
Therefore, Juan made a higher rate of pay than Lisa.
Answer: Juan said he made a better rate of pay because he was paid $14.80 an hour.
For such more question on rate
#SPJ3
The following question may be like this:
Juan worked 2.5 hours and earned $37.00. Lisa was paid $42.00 for 3 hours of work. Which of the following statements is true?
Juan made a lower rate of pay because he made less money.
Lisa made a better rate of pay because she made more money.
Lisa said she made a better rate of pay because her rate was $14 an hour.
Juan said he made a better rate of pay because he was paid $14.80 an hour.
Answer:
2. Juan worked 2.5 hours and earned $37.00. Lisa was paid $42.00 for 3 hours of work. Which of the following statements is true?
Lisa said she made a better rate of pay because her rate was $14 an hour.
Answer: Juan said he made a better rate of pay because he was paid $14.80 an hour.
Juan made a lower rate of pay because he made less money.
Lisa made a better rate of pay because she made more money.
h(x)=-(x-3)^2+4
compare to the graph
g(x)=x^2
Answer:
Guard Two
Step-by-step explanation:
Guard two has the path to the treasure because he's telling people that there's no treasure. That makes him suspicious because he might want the treasure for himself
This is a logic puzzle wherein the guards' statements are evaluated based on the given criteria: only one guard is truthful. Upon analysis, we find that only the path guarded by Guard 2 aligns with this criteria, indicating that this is the path you should take to find the treasure.
This is a classic logic problem, often called the 'Liar and Truth-Teller' puzzle. Here's how we can tackle it:
Guard 1 says: 'The treasure lies down this path.'
Guard 2 says: 'No treasure lies down this path, seek elsewhere.'
Guard 3 says: 'The first guard is lying.'
Since we know that only one guard is telling the truth, let's consider if Guard 1 tells the truth. If so, Guard 2 and Guard 3 would be lying, which contradicts the statement of Guard 3 (who confirms Guard 1's statement as a lie).
If Guard 2 is telling the truth (which means there's no treasure on his path), then both Guard 1 and Guard 3 would be lying, which fits our criteria.
If Guard 3 told the truth, this would mean that Guard 1 is lying, but then Guard 2 would also be telling the truth--this contradicts our initial information (only one guard is truthful).
So, based on these evaluations, you should take the path guarded by Guard 2 because he's the only one telling the truth according to the given criteria.
#SPJ2
Answer:
commutative property
Step-by-step explanation:
The commutative property is a math rule that says that the order in which we multiply numbers does not change the product.
Answer: Answers below
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve for y.
----------------------------------------------
When x = -2; y = 8
----------------------------------------------
When x = 1 ; y = 2
----------------------------------------------
When x = 3 ; y = -2