Answer:
(x+6)2
Step-by-step explanation:1
What two numbers sum up to the middle term (6), and have a product of the last term (36)?
After some trial and error, we arrive at 6 and 6, which means we can factor this as
(x+6)(x+6) or (x+6)2
Another way we could have approached this is that we see that the leading term and the last term are both perfect squares.
With this in mind, we could rewrite the expression as
(x)2+12x+(6)2
Now, it becomes a little more clearer that we can factor this as
(x+6)2
Answer:
(x-6)^2
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helped
Answer:
3*8=24 --------- 35-24=11
Answer:
11
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation is 35 - 3 • 8
To solve it, we can use the order of operations: PEMDAS. (Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction)
Simplify:
35 - 24
11
hope this helps! have a great day!
B. There is evidence to conclude that p1C.There is evidence to conclude that p1>p2 because all values in the interval are positive.
D. There is evidence to conclude that p1E. There is evidence to conclude that p2>p1 because 0.247 and 0.325 are both greater than 0.05.
You can use the fact that the 90% confidence interval given is all positive value for the test statistic being the difference of and .
The conclusion that is supported by the given confidence interval is given by:
Option C: There is evidence to conclude that because all values in the interval are positive.
Since it is given that the difference is measured by ,
and since the given confidence interval at 90% confidence for that difference is obtained to be (0.247,0.325), thus we can say that 90% difference value of , will be lying in that given interval.
Since the interval is all positive, thus we can say that 90% of the times, the difference will be positive which indicates that
Thus, the conclusion that is supported by the interval is given by:
Option C: There is evidence to conclude that because all values in the interval are positive.
Learn more about confidence interval here:
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Statistics!!
When we have a confidence interval for the difference in proportions or means, our null hypothesis is always that there's no difference. (H0 = p1-p2 = 0.)
If the difference is positive, that means we have sufficient evidence p1>p2.
If it's negative, then we have sufficient evidence p2>p1.
Why not A: incorrect interpretation of the interval
Why not B: doesn't look like a complete answer
Why not D: also doesn't look like a complete answer
Why not E: this confuses the definition of alpha-level and p-value with confidence interval values. If those were p-values and greater or less than an alpha-level, we would reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. That isn't the case here.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the Quotient Rule of Exponents:, you must subtract the exponents of each exponential expression (in fractions) before applying the Product Rule of Exponents (I will explain in a while what it means).
First, subtract the exponents of the first fraction,
Next, subtract the exponents of the second fraction:
At this point, we have the following exponential expressions: and .
Since the required operation is multiplication, then you can apply the Product Rule of Exponents:
Therefore, the correct answer is .
Please mark my answers as the Brainliest, if you find this helpful :)
Answer: choice D
Step-by-step explanation:
In order for something to be a function for every x input there must be exactly 1 y output. This means that if x is a number then y must always be 1 number and that 1 number only.