Answer
The protesters supported an unpopular view.
Explanation
According to the First Amendment in the civil rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students’ rights of peaceable assembly, speech, and petition when the police dispersed a peaceful protest against segregation..This was when a certain group of the African-American high school and college students marched on the South Carolina State House grounds in Columbia to protest segregation SO the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students' thus according to the Edwards v he protesters supported an unpopular view.
The correct option is .
Edward V. Carolina case was the situation which was interfered by the Supreme court who had supported the amendments in the Articles from First to Fourteenth and prevented the administration state administrators to reinforce the petitioners which were meeting lawfully to the anterior side of the statehouse.
Further Explanation:
Supreme court imprisoned, executed, and sentenced applicants who have violated the free power of applicants independence of petition and free association. The Highest authority of Courts also maintained the privileges are guarded by fourteenth amendments and confirmed by the first amendment of the United States. Edwards v. South Carolina was a matter in which the Supreme Court sustained that state government administrators are not permitted to assault the mob to disband if they are unless constitutionally walking in front of a statehouse. The judgment was based on the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution. The Supreme Court explained that the suspensions were an effort to make illegal the nonviolent appearance of offensive views, and therefore a violation of the marchers’ right of free expression, free association, and independence to appeal for restoration of grievances. The highest authority of tribunal interpreted the detentions and condemnations of 187 protesters was an effort by South Carolina to make unlawful and the favorable appearance of unpopular views where the marcher's efforts were an application of First Amendment freedoms in their most fundamental and classic method. The Court explained the common law violation of breach of the sympathy as not susceptible of specific definition.
Learn more:
1. In the case roe v. wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws? brainly.com/question/10483664
2. In Mcculloch v. Maryland, what did the state of maryland argue? brainly.com/question/1373726
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Supreme Court Cases
Keywords:
Protestors , supreme court , Edward , South Carolina , amendment , freedom , restoration , grievances, violation , judgement , government , suspension, unpopular.
In federal midterm elections, voters choose who will represent them in the House and Senate. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is elections?
A political system includes the term election. Election voting is a privilege granted to all citizens. Candidate selected by the public to serve the nation without controversy.
A candidate has the chance to influence society, address issues facing the public, and create legislation during an election. One vote, one right is the campaign's slogan.
Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on elections, here:
#SPJ5
Answer:
yes ofcourse. if they are grown in our local environment for our daily uses and for otherspurposes.
Answer:
Different plants were domesticated to grow crops in many parts of the world
Explanation:
got it correct
The idea that people are born with rights that no government can take away
The idea of dividing government powers into legislative, executive, and judicial branches
The idea that there is a body of law said to come from nature that is common to all humans
During the Age of Enlightenment, a model was introduced that concerned the legitimacy of the government over its citizens.
Notable philosophers like Rousseau, Hobbes and Locke liked this approach and described its precise significance to the residents.
The correct answer is:
Option A. The idea is that people consent to government authority and in return, the government protects their rights.
This can be explained as:
Therefore, citizens acquiesce to the government and in return gets protected for their rights.
To learn more about social contracts follow the link: