The emphasis in the United States is on leisure, self-fulfillment, physical fitness, feeling youthful, and environmental awareness. The emerging value cluster is a response to fundamental changes in society.
The emergence of a value cluster in the US is a reaction to societal shifts including the move to a service-based economy and increasing environmental consciousness.
Therefore, The emerging value cluster is a response to fundamental changes in society. Thus, the correct answer is Society.
Learn more about value clusters here,
#SPJ4
Answer:Es la vida
saludos
do they affect trade?
Answer:
Most rainforests are found in the Congo river basin on the Atlantic Ocean side. They affect trade because the rainforest trees are being cutted down for wood and animals are being poached.
Explanation:
The abnormal functioning would be due to chemical imbalances in the prefrontal cortex (PC), since PC is the responsible for behavior including appropriate social behavior, judgment and impulse control.
Answer: Prefrontal cortex (PFC)
Explanation:
Prefrontal cortex is sector of the brain which is present in frontal lobe's front section. It is considered as the part of cerebral cortex. This part is responsible for controlling the expression, emotions, behavior, decisions etc in a human.They also carry out the function of cognition or executive function.
Functions of cognition like selection of better option, disputed thoughts , result prediction , social control , good or bad effect are induced due to this sector .
According to the question, antisocial disorder or personality in Ted can be due to the action performed by the prefrontal cortex of the brain which is affecting the behavior and personality to become antisocial
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is the cerebral cortex covering the front part of the frontal lobe. This brain region has been implicated in planning complex cognitive behavior, personality expression, decision making, and moderating social behaviour.Ja
Answer:
it is better to make important or risky decisions after carefully thinking them through
HOPE IT HELPS :)
PLEASE MARK IT THE BRAINLIEST!
Answer: This passage does commit a fallacy; specifically, it does commit an appeal to fear fallacy.
Explanation:
Appeal to fear is a type of informal fallacy that seeks to convince supporters to back an idea by creating fear towards the opposite option. It´s a fallacy that evokes the fear of something terribly wrong happening in the present or in the future in order to convince people of accepting a specific idea to be right.
In this case, the student´s participation in the administration's decision-making process is presented as an option that can only lead to chaos.
The passage commits an appeal to fear fallacy by using fear to discourage student participation in decision-making.
The passage commits an appeal to fear fallacy. This fallacy occurs when someone tries to persuade others to adopt a certain viewpoint or take a specific course of action by using fear, often by exaggerating or presenting unlikely negative outcomes. In the given passage, the leader of the student organization argues for more student participation in decision-making, but the writer argues against it by invoking chaos and the loss of authority for teachers and administrators. This is an attempt to instill fear and discourage the idea of student involvement.
#SPJ12
Answer: Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right
Explanation:
Killing is not an easy thing to do, but there is a great difference between self-defense and outright killing, but either ways, someone will definitely die. Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right.
Nathanson argues that killing in self-defense is compatible with the respect for the dignity of human life by upholding the right to bodily autonomy and moral considerations. Killing in such circumstances is seen as a response to an immediate threat to one's life and not as an act of aggression.
The explanation of how Nathanson argues that killing in self defense is compatible with respect for the dignity of human life lies in the concept of the sanctity of human life, the right to bodily autonomy, and moral and rational considerations. According to Nathanson, killing in self-defense is morally justified when one's life is in immediate threat or danger. In such cases, the dignity of human life is respected as the act of self-defense is carried out in preservation of one's own life.
Nathanson suggests that every individual has a right to bodily autonomy – the right of individuals to determine what happens to their bodies. When the life of an individual is threatened, they have the right to defend themselves, which may at times involve killing as a last resort. This act of killing is seen as a response to an immediate danger and not as an act of aggression.
Moreover, Nathanson's argument can also be connected to moral reasoning. He doesn't argue that killing is generally acceptable, but rather, only under very specific circumstances such as self-defense where it's seen as the lesser of two evils. Thus, recognizing the sanctity and dignity of human life while also acknowledging situations where self-defense is necessary involves a complex interplay of moral, ethical and personal considerations according to Nathanson.
#SPJ11
Answer:option d. little change in the number of driver deaths, but more accidents and more pedestrian deaths
Explanation: the use of seatbelt does not really reduce accident rate but it's use was enforced by the government to reduce death rate and magnitude of injury to the person using the car.
Injuries as a result of road traffic incidents are the main reason of problem in public health and also a major cause of death and injury in the world at large. A large number of pedestrians have being killed on roads in American.seat-belt likely the one most effective part in a car that helps to limit or reduce the magnitude and severity of injury to occupants of a car or vehiclethat is as a result of road accident.not using seat-belt is
high risk factor for road traffic deaths and injuries among people in a car crash.vehicle occupants who don't like using seat-belts and have a crash especially in the front of the car, are usually likely to have a head damage or injury
U.S. laws requiring seat belts have resulted in a reduction in both driver deaths and pedestrian deaths
U.S. laws requiring drivers to wear seat belts have resulted in a reduction in both driver deaths and pedestrian deaths. The use of seat belts has been proven to save lives in the event of a car accident. When drivers wear seat belts, they are more protected and less likely to be seriously injured or killed in a crash. In addition, seat belt usage also reduces the likelihood of being ejected from the vehicle, which can further reduce fatalities.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), seat belts are estimated to save more than 15,000 lives each year in the United States. This is because seat belts help prevent occupants from being thrown around inside the vehicle during a collision or sudden stop. As a result, both the number of driver deaths and pedestrian deaths have decreased as a result of these laws.
#SPJ3