In Stanley Milgram’s obedience research, the person playing the part of the “learner” was an accomplice, or Confederate of the experiment.
Conclusively, we can say that in Stanley Milgram’s obedience research, the person playing the part of the “learner” was an accomplice, or Confederate of the experiment.
Learn more from:
In Milgram's experiment, the 'learner' was actually a confederate, or an accomplice. The 'learner' was secretly part of the research team and helped to manipulate conditions to study obedience to authority. Confederates acted as if they were receiving shocks to convince real participants they were causing harm.
In Stanley Milgram's obedience research, the person playing the part of the "learner" was an accomplice, or a confederate, of the experiment. He was aware of the true purpose of the research, never received shocks, and was acting according to Milgram's instructions.
Milgram's research was to test obedience to authority, inspired in part by Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann's defense of "just following orders." The experiment demonstrated that many people would inflict perceived harm on others if instructed by an authority figure. Confederates, who were a part of the research team, pretended to be participants and helped manipulate the research conditions.
The term confederate in this context refers to a person who is informed about the experiment and works for the researcher, manipulating social situations as part of the research design. In this experiment, the confederates would act as if they were receiving shocks when given incorrect answers, further convincing the true participants of the illusion.
#SPJ11
Answer:
50 km/h
Explanation:
300/6=50
Answer:
Explanation:Great Compromise
Also known as the Connecticut Compromise, a major compromise at the Constitutional Convention that created a two-house legislature, with the Senate having equal representation for all states and the House of Representatives having representation proportional to state populations.
The type of sampling strategy that is being demonstrated above is called convenience sampling. Convenience sampling is being defined as a non-probability technique by which the subjects that are being selected because they are easily or conveniently accessible whereas it could be seen in the scenario above.
"A researcher measures the time taken by participants to press a button following a signal. This measure is an example of a(n) interval scale.
An interval scale is a type of quantitative measurement scale in which the intervals between values are equal and meaningful.
In this scenario, the time taken to press the button is measured in seconds or milliseconds, and the intervals between each unit of time are equal and meaningful.
For example, the difference between 1 second and 2 seconds is the same as the difference between 5 seconds and 6 seconds.
Interval scales allow for meaningful mathematical operations, such as addition and subtraction, to be performed on the data.
However, interval scales do not have a true zero point, meaning that the absence of the measured attribute (in this case, time) does not represent a complete absence of the property being measured.
In this case, a time of 0 seconds does not imply that there was no time taken to press the button; it simply means that the time was not measured.
For more such questions on researcher
#SPJ1
Answer:
This answer is completely personal as it requires analyzing your own personality.
In order for you to achieve this, I will give you the explanation you need.
Strengths:
Psychodynamic theory has several strengths that account for it to be responsive throughout modern psychological thought. First, the impact of childhood on adult personality and mental health is explained. Second, the innate drives that motivate our behavior are explored. It is in this way that she takes psychodynamic theory into account for both sides of the nature / culture debate. On the one hand, it points out the way in which unconscious mental processes are born influencing their thoughts, feelings and behavior. On the other hand, it highlights the influence of childhood relationships and experiences on later development.
Weaknesses:
Despite its advantages, psychodynamic theory has a number of weaknesses, too. In the first place, critics often accuse it of being too deterministic, and therefore it can be denied that people can exercise conscious and free will. In other words, by emphasizing the unconscious and the roots of personality in childhood experience, psychodynamic theory suggests that behavior is pre-determined and ignores the possibility that people have personal action.
Explanation:
When speaking of psychodynamic theories we are therefore speaking of a heterogeneous set of perspectives that have their origin in conceptions of mental processes derived from psychoanalysis.
In this sense, all of them share with Freudian theory the idea that there are intrapsychic conflicts between the conscious and the unconscious, one of the main objectives of therapy being to contribute to making the patient able to understand and manage the unconscious content ( bringing it to consciousness).
In addition, psychodynamic theories also consider the existence of defense strategies and mechanisms used by the psyche to minimize the suffering generated by these conflicts, and they agree that the psychic structure and personality are formed during childhood from satisfaction or dissatisfaction of needs.
Psychodynamic theories and therapies are multiple. Some of the best known are listed below:
In analyzing my own personality based on psychodynamic theories, I would focus on the concepts of the unconscious mind, defense mechanisms, and the role of childhood experiences.
In analyzing my own personality based on psychodynamic theories, I would focus on the concepts of the unconscious mind, defense mechanisms, and the role of childhood experiences in shaping my personality. For example, I might examine how my unconscious desires and fears influence my behavior and thoughts, and how defense mechanisms such as repression or projection manifest in my interactions with others. Additionally, I would explore how my early experiences and relationships with my parents or caregivers have influenced my personality traits and patterns of behavior.
By applying psychodynamic theories to analyze my own personality, I can gain insight into my strengths and weaknesses. For instance, understanding the influence of my unconscious mind can help me recognize any underlying fears or desires that might be affecting my decision-making or relationships. Similarly, recognizing defense mechanisms can help me identify any patterns of avoidance or denial that may be hindering my personal growth. Lastly, exploring my childhood experiences can help me understand the origins of certain personality traits and provide a foundation for personal development.
#SPJ3