Hey there!
y + 3 = 30
SUBTRACT 3 to BOTH SIDES
y + 3 - 3 = 30 - 3
CANCEL out: 3 - 3 because that gives you 0
KEEP: 30 - 3 because that gives you the value of y
y = 30 - 3
30 - 3 = y
y = 27
Answer: y = 27
Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!
~Amphitrite1040:)
Answer:344 i think if im wrong thats alright
Step-by-step explanation:
per person. How many people is she having?
Answer:
70 people
Step-by-step explanation:
428-15=423
423/6=70.5
she can invite 70 people
taxable income last year?
A. $5262.03
B. $437.97
C. $0
D. $3212.03
The part-time shelf stocker's taxable income is calculated by subtracting the exemption of $3650 and the standard deduction of $5700 from her annual income of $8912.03, resulting in a negative number, which means her taxable income was $0.
To calculate the taxable income for the part-time shelf stocker who made $8912.03 last year, we need to subtract the exemption and standard deduction from her annual income. The exemption claimed is $3650, and the standard deduction is $5700.
Here's the calculation:
Since the taxable income cannot be negative, the correct answer is $0. Thus, her taxable income last year was $0.
#SPJ2
Answer: C) $0
Step-by-step explanation:
Demon slayer
a. Create a boxplot of the percent women for each of the 7 judges. Comment on whether you believe that Spock’s lawyers might have a point.
b. Determine whether there is a significant difference in the percent of women included in the 6 judges’ venires who aren’t Spock’s judge.
c. Determine whether there is a significant difference in the percent of women incuded in Spock’s venires versus the percent included in the other judges’ venires combined. (Your answer to a. should justify doing this.)
Answer:
Consider the following calculations
Step-by-step explanation:
The complete R snippet is as follows
install.packages("Sleuth3")
library("Sleuth3")
attach(case0502)
data(case0502)
## plot
# plots
boxplot(Percent~ Judge, data=case0502,ylab="Values",
main="Boxplots of the Data",col=c(2:7,8),horizontal=TRUE)
# perform anova analysis
a<- aov(lm(Percent~ Judge,data=case0502))
#summarise the results
summary(a)
### we can use the independent sample t test here
sp<-case0502[which(case0502$Judge=="Spock's"),]
nsp<-case0502[which(case0502$Judge!="Spock's"),]
## perform the test
t.test(sp$Percent,nsp$Percent)
The results are CHECK THE IMAGE ATTACHED
b)
> summary(a)
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Judge 6 1927 321.2 6.718 6.1e-05 *** as the p value is less than 0.05 , hence there is a significant difference in the percent of women included in the 6 judges’ venires who aren’t Spock’s judge
Residuals 39 1864 47.8
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
c)
t.test(sp$Percent,nsp$Percent)
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: sp$Percent and nsp$Percent
t = -7.1597, df = 17.608, p-value = 1.303e-06 ## as the p value is less than 0.05 , hence we reject the null hypothesis in favor of alternate hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the percent of women incuded in Spock’s venires versus the percent included in the other judges’ venires combined
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-19.23999 -10.49935
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y
14.62222 29.49189
Answer:
25 CAN be written as a fraction.
=> 250/10 = 25
Square root of 14 is 3.74165738677
It is NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE THIS FULL NUMBER AS A FRACTION, but if we simplify the decimal like: 3.74, THEN WE CAN WRITE THIS AS A FRACTION
=> 374/100
-1.25 CAN be written as a fraction.
=> -5/4 = -1.25
Square root of 16 CAN also be written as a fraction.
=> sqr root of 16 = 4.
4 can be written as a fraction.
=> 4 = 8/2
Pi = 3.14.........
It is NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE THE FULL 'PI' AS A FRACTION, but if we simplify 'pi' to just 3.14, THEN WE CAN WRITE IT AS A FRACTION
=> 314/100
.6 CAN be written as a fraction.
=> 6/10 = .6