The answer is stalemate.
Neither side had the advantage as both armies remained in the trenches and were unable to advance. It was only during the entry of the United States that the tide of the war began to turn.
Explanation:
Stalemate could be a state of affairs within the game of chess wherever the player whose flip it's to maneuver isn't in restraint however has no legal move. the principles of chess give that once stalemate happens, the sport ends as a draw.
The answer is stalemate. Neither side had the advantage as both armies remained in the trenchesand were unable to advance. It was only during the entry of the United States that the tide of the war began to turn.
Answer:
north
Explanation:
the north had better leaders
The historian is placing the argument in historical context.
The historian is comparing and contrasting primary sources.
The historian is developing a hypothesis.
Answer: B. The historian is placing the argument in historical context.
Explanation: correct on edmentum
The correct answer is D) King Alfonso 1 wrote a letter to protest colonial practices, while the Khoisan tribe violently opposed colonists.
King Alfonso 1 of Kongo’s reaction to European colonization in Africa was different from that of the Khoisan tribe in that King Alfonso 1 wrote a letter to protest colonial practices, while the Khoisan violently opposed colonists.
King Alfonso 1 (1460-1542) was the King of Kongo in the African Continent. He helped spread Christianity in the country. He had close relations with Portugal until some complications appeared when he tried to restrict Portuguese activities in Kongo such as the slave trade. The Khoisan tribe were indigenous people from Africa. They are considered to be Africa’s original people. They were nomadic farmers and hunters. The reaction of these two groups against Europe colonization was too different. King Alfonso 1 of Kongo’s reaction to European colonization in Africa was different from that of the Khoisan tribe in that King Alfonso 1 wrote a letter to protest colonial practices, while the Khoisan violently opposed colonists.
An archaeologist was able to determine the sites by the bricks similar but was old found in the area where they lay railroads.
Explanation:
Question:
How does an impeachment proceeding work for a Cabinet officer?
There are four answers that you must say.
Answer:
A Cabinet officer may be impeached in a number of ways, including:
by charges made on the floor of the House of Representatives by a representative;
by charges referred to a committee for debate and exam;
by charges made by a State legislature or grade jury; or
by charges made by an investigative House committee.