Answer:
A.
Explanation: its brought into a country
Marshall then pointed to Article VI of the Constitution, which says that the Constitution is the ‘supreme Law of the Land; … any Thing in the … Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.’ Stating that ‘the power to tax involves the power to destroy,’ he said that the states ‘have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to impede, or … control’ the laws of the federal government, and thus the law ‘imposing a tax on the Bank of the United States, is unconstitutional and void.’
Answer: A. The Nazis promoted German nationalism and used propaganda to convince Germans that Jews were naturally enemies of Germany.
Answer: I would say probably because the Nazi put the Jewish into concentration camps so that automatically connects the two i guess (lmk if that helps)
Explanation:
Phil's behavior most likely is a result of the defense mechanism of displacement.
Behavior depends on both situational factors and biological properties. Humanistic psychology focuses on the potential of each individual and emphasizes the importance of growth and self-actualization.
Social science perspectives that emphasize sociopolitical or material inequalities of social groups either criticize the broader sociopolitical system or otherwise divert attention away from structural functionalism and ideological conservatism.
Parents pass on the genes and provide the environment. Both affect child development. Strong situations have a high degree of structure and definition, and thus provide outstanding cues for action. Weak situations, by contrast, are relatively unstructured and ambiguous, and thus do not provide such behavioral cues.
Learn more about The defense mechanism here:- brainly.com/question/17643438
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ethics
Explanation:
Utilitarian ethics is based on the belief of evaluating the benefits and harms of actions. In this case the action is lying to the young team in order to keep their spirts high and encourage the team to continue to play and have fun.
So lying although by some considered as unethical, utilitarian ethics considers it acceptable when the action (the lie) has a greater benefit or minimizes harm, than not lying.
Utilitarian ethics does not consider it immoral to lie if the lie has a greater benefit or it reduces harm. It could even be considered immoral not to lie because of the harm it could cause, in this case to the young team.
In this example if the girls' soccer coach did not lie it could hurt the spirts of the young soccer team, and could discourage them from continuing to play and have fun.
So Kathleen the girls' soccer coach estimated the consequence of the lie as a greater benefit than telling the truth and possibly hurting the teams spirits and fun.
Although it seems reasonable to lie to the team and not hurt their feelings, some critizise this approach. The problem that critics have with utilitarian ethics is that people could erronuesly estimate the consequence of the lie and the harm or benefits it could have.
For example, maybe by telling the team the truth it would encourage the team to improve and grow by correcting their mistakes and having a positive outcome.
So although lying could seem as the right thing to do for Kathleen, other coaches could have a different approach, and ethical thought should be considered when making decisions that could harm or benefit people.
A system that grants unlimited powers to a central government
B.
A system based on the belief that a strong central government best serves the needs of the people
C.
A system where local governments control the powers of the central government
D.
A system where a central government and local governments work together with equal power and control
Answer:
i was looking for the answer and i could not find it but i looked at my test review and c is the right answer im sorry no one answered sooner.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is C: a system where local governments control the powers of the central government
Explanation:
i took the quiz i hope i helped!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not include options, we can say the following.
Roughly how much federal disaster relief funding did Texas receive for the 2015 storms and flooding in central Texas? The answer is roughly $80 million.
Approximately 100 towns in the state of Texas were severely damaged due to the storms and flooding of May-June heavy storms. However, four months later, Hurricane Patricia hit hard over the Houston and vicinity area, causing so much damage and pain in the region, paralyzing important freeways and main avenues. The effects of the hurricane also affected the capital of the state, Austin, Texas.