what is 50% of the number?
explain how you worked this out
Is 0.602 equvalent to 0.62
Answer:
10. Not equivalent.
11. Equivalent
12. Not equivalent
13. Not equivalent
14. Equivalent
15. Can't read, but I think not equivalent.
Basically, if they can be multiplied by the same scale factor they are equivalent, else they aren't.
Step-by-step explanation:
what that guy said :0
4x – y + z = 7
X – 3y + 2z =-5
Answer:
(x, y, z) = (1, 12, 15)
Step-by-step explanation:
As with any set of linear equations, there are many possible routes to a solution. We might simplify the notation a bit by writing the coefficients in an augmented matrix. The columns, left to right, represent the coefficients of x, y, and z, in order, and the constant term.
The row operations we'll use are multiplying a row by a value and adding that result to another row, replacing the other row by the sum.
We can make things a little simpler by writing the second equation first. Then the augmented matrix we're starting with is ...
Adding the second row to the first, we get ...
Dividing the first row by 5 gives ...
Subtracting this from the second row, and again from the third row, we are left with ...
Multiplying the second row by 3 and adding that to the third row, we get ...
Subtracting the third row from the second gives ...
Finally, multiplying the last row by -1, we have the solution:
This matrix corresponds to the equations ...
_____
The purpose of our choice of row operations is to make the diagonal elements 1 and the off-diagonal elements 0. That is how we end up with the final equations shown.
As we said, there are many ways to go about this. In general, one can ...
(2.) 4 times m = m times 4
(3.) {x + 2} + 5 = x + {2 +5}