In his later ministry, Paul called Mark his?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Fellow-Laborer i believe
Answer 2
Answer: In Philemon 1:24, Paul refers to Mark as his "fellow laborer". 

Related Questions

Which woman mentioned in the lesson was an advocate for women’s health who increased access to information about birth control? The NWSA divided its efforts between suffrage and abolition; the AWSA did not.The NWSA believed that suffrage was inevitable; the AWSA believed actively working for suffrage.The NWSA supported Catt’s “Winning Plan”; the AWSA did not.The NWSA worked for a constitutional amendment granting suffrage; the AWSA fought for suffrage at the state level
How were the achievements of the Mauryan and Gupta empires different? (4 points) The Gupta Empire promoted peace, while the Mauryan Empire conquered other groups. The Mauryan Empire expanded its borders, while the Gupta Empire expanded commerce. The Mauryan Empire produced great art, while the Gupta Empire advanced in literacy. The Mauryan followed Buddhism, while the Gupta Empire followed Hinduism.
This nation was famous for kicking off the Age of Exploration. Spain Portugal The Netherlands England
What kind of activities do caribbean people enjoy
President george w. bush's actions in sending american troops to afghanistan and iraq illustrated the presidents constitutional power

Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant? Hernandez v. Texas

Roe v. Wade

Gideon v. Wainright

Tinker v. Des Moines

Mapp v. Ohio

Answers

I believe the answer is: Mapp v Ohio

Mapp v Ohio was considered to be a landmark case in which united states court ruled out that the agents of justice departments are banned to conduct "unreasonable search and seizures". This make polices unable to search a private property without a warrant unless they hear a scream, cry for help or gun shot.

A Supreme Court case founded that it was unauthorized to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant is Mapp v. Ohio. Furthermore, Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) was a breakthrough case in criminal process, in which the United States Supreme Court determined that evidence gained in abuse of the Fourth Amendment which defends opposed to "unreasonable seizures and searches," cannot be operated in state courts, state law criminal trials, and federal criminal law trials in federal courts as had previously been the law.

 

EXPLANATION:

The Supreme Court completed this by usage of a popular standard as selective integration; in Mapp this included the integration of the necessities, as construed by the Court, of the Fourth Amendment which is related only to acts of the federal government into the Fourteenth Amendment expected process clause which is related to acts of the states.

 

Particular investigations don't need a search warrant. For example,

• Consent: a permit is not needed when an individual in control of the property or object gives consent for the investigation.

• Hot chase of a criminal (to avert a criminal’s escape or aptitude to harm others);

• Forthcoming demolition of proof: where evidence might be demolished before an investigation can be properly gained;

• Emergency investigations: such as where there is somebody is heard yelling for help inside a residence; or

• Investigation incident to capture (to alleviate the risk of damage to the seizing officers specifically).

• Public safety: a warrantless investigation may be allowable in an emergency condition where the public is in a risky situation.

• Plain view: the proof is in the basic view of law enforcement officials, from a legal vantage point (with similar exclusions that involve basic smell, where the officer notices a scent that shows the occurrence of criminal activity or contraband).

 

In the case of a plain view, the official is legally on the assertions, his surveillance is from a lawful vantage point, and it is instantly obvious that the proof is contraband. The plain view rule implements, for instance, when the official has dragged the accused for a seat belt defilement and ensures a syringe on the seat of the passenger.

 

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Which Supreme Court case established that it was unconstitutional to search a person’s personal property without a proper search warrant? brainly.com/question/2507015

KEYWORDS : unreasonable searches and seizures, Mapp v. Ohio

Subject  : History

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : American Law History

The most important magistrates were the censors. Censors recorded the city'spopulation and how much property each person owned.




A:true
B:false

Answers

Answer:

True!

Explanation:

I HOPE THIS WILL HELP U

Which of these describes a major factor in the conflict that the United States had with the Soviet Union during the Cold War?a. The United States hoped to conquer valuable Soviet natural resources.
b. The United States believed that the Soviet Union was opposed to globalization.
c. The United States was attacked by Soviet troops on multiple occasions.
d. The United States opposed the Soviet Union's communist system.

Answers

The major factor of the conflict between the US and the soviet union was that the US opposed the soviet's communist system, so the correct option would be (D).

After world war 2 when the Allied powers defeated Axis powers. The united states and the soviet union emerged as two super powers. The US dropped 2 atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which resulted into the end of world war 2.

The cold war started because the US could not tolerate the communist policies of the Soviets, which was one of the main reasons for WW2. On the other hand soviet did not like the interference of the united states into Europe and its territories.

Both the countries learned a lesson that it would not be wise to fight on the battlefield, so the cold war started.

Hence, the major factor of the conflict between the US and the soviet union was that the US opposed the soviet's communist system, so the correct option would be (D).

To know more about the cold war visit here:

brainly.com/question/32856989

#SPJ5

ur answer would be D.. Hope it right and it helped u out!

The 1832 Reform Bill extended the franchise, or right to vote, to all native-born Englishmen. a. True
b. False

Answers

False, it gave seats in the House of Commons to large cities that sprung up during the Industrial Revolution. 

Which of these countries would have been "behind the Iron Curtain" during the Cold War?

Answers

all of Eastern Europe, so the Soviet Union, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and there are more

How many civilians were killed by American soldiers at My Lai on March 16, 1968? 100 200 300 400

Answers

How many civilians were killed by American soldiers at My Lai on March 16, 1968? 

400 civilians were killed by American soldiers at My Lai on March 16, 1968. Some were raped, clubbed and stabbed. 
There were a total of 400 civilians killed ( murdered ) by American soldiers on March 16 , 1968 . ( 03/16/1968 ).

This event described also in the statement given the name of My Lai .

I really hope that this helps you out a lot :) have a nice day.