b. A good leader
c. Clear rules
d. A goal handed down from upper management
b. Using a cap-and-tradeLOADING... system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $ nothing million per year.
c. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution?
d. If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. The cost of eliminating is shown below:
= $275 × 20
= $5,500
b. The cost would be $375 per ton
c. In the case when the permits are not tradable so in this the cost is $5,500
d. In the case when the permits cannot be traded so the cost of the pollution reduction is
= $375 × 10 + $275 × 10
= $3,750 + $2,750
= $6,500
b) inception level
c) terminal level
d) manifestation level
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Manifestation level is the level where the changes or variations in the knowledge or the behavior and it could be observed or noticed. And usually the fluctuation effect need to be adequate strong in order to break or smash by the manifestation level.
It is that level where there could be fluctuation effects as well as the baseline effects.
Answer: Master limited partnership
Explanation:
A master limited partnership also referred to as a MLP, is known as a limited partnership which is publicly traded on an exchange. A Master Limited Partnership tends to combine the tax benefits or advantages from a limited partnership with its liquidity that are the publicly traded securities such as stocks and bonds offer. A MLP tends to pays taxes like every other partnerships, thus by passing profits through to individual, and also accounting for these profits on owner's tax return.
2. consume is one-half.
3. consume is four-fifths.
4. consume is one-fifths.
Answer:
3. Marginal Propensity to Consume is four-fifths
Explanation:
Step One: Check the Information Provided
Carol's Disposable Income = $1,200 increased to $1,700
Carol's Savings = $200 increased to $300
Since we are given information on Carol's income and savings, the first thing to do is calculate her Marginal Propensity to Save. If we were given Carol's consumption, we should have calcated the Marginal Propensity to Consume.
Step Two: Calculate the Marginal Propensity to Save and Check the Answers
Marginal Propensity to Save or MPS= Change in Savings÷ Change in Disposable income
Change in Savings= $300-$200 = $100
Change in Income= $1,700 - $1,200= $500
MPS= $100/$500 = One-fifths
Checking the answer, the Marginal Propensity to Save at One-fifths is not part of the options.
Step Three: Calculate thh Marginal Propensity to Consume from the Marginal Propensity to Save
The formula for Marginal Propensity to Consume can either be
Change in Consumption/Change in Income
or
1-Marginal Propensity to Save
Since we have the Marginal Propensity to save (MPS) then
Marginal Propensity to Consume or MPC = 1-1/5
=4/5 or four-fifths
This is option 3.
Answer:
Option 3: consume is four-fifths.
Explanation:
When Carol's disposable income was $1200 she saved $200
Therefore, (200/1200) x 100% = 16.6%
When it increased to %1700 savings also increased to %300,
So (300/1700) x 100 = 17.8%
Carol was able to save 16.6% to 17.8% which makes her marginal propensity to consume four-fifths.
This makes Option 3 the appropriate answer.
Answer:
The proceeds from the bond issue are allocated between the bonds and the warrants on the basis of their relative market values.
Explanation:
Bonds are securities issued by the company where investor can invest in such securities and can earn interest.
Warrants are rights which states that on redemption of bonds it shall be converted into company's shares.
When bonds are issued with detachable warrants, that means there is a basic amount of bonds and warrants. Also, each shall be accounted separately.
Bond issue of these bonds includes value of bonds that shall be accounted and added to value of bonds, and the value of warrants shall be accounted in warrants.