Answer: Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right
Explanation:
Killing is not an easy thing to do, but there is a great difference between self-defense and outright killing, but either ways, someone will definitely die. Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right.
Nathanson argues that killing in self-defense is compatible with the respect for the dignity of human life by upholding the right to bodily autonomy and moral considerations. Killing in such circumstances is seen as a response to an immediate threat to one's life and not as an act of aggression.
The explanation of how Nathanson argues that killing in self defense is compatible with respect for the dignity of human life lies in the concept of the sanctity of human life, the right to bodily autonomy, and moral and rational considerations. According to Nathanson, killing in self-defense is morally justified when one's life is in immediate threat or danger. In such cases, the dignity of human life is respected as the act of self-defense is carried out in preservation of one's own life.
Nathanson suggests that every individual has a right to bodily autonomy – the right of individuals to determine what happens to their bodies. When the life of an individual is threatened, they have the right to defend themselves, which may at times involve killing as a last resort. This act of killing is seen as a response to an immediate danger and not as an act of aggression.
Moreover, Nathanson's argument can also be connected to moral reasoning. He doesn't argue that killing is generally acceptable, but rather, only under very specific circumstances such as self-defense where it's seen as the lesser of two evils. Thus, recognizing the sanctity and dignity of human life while also acknowledging situations where self-defense is necessary involves a complex interplay of moral, ethical and personal considerations according to Nathanson.
#SPJ11
Answer:
The answer is Neuroscience.
Explanation:
Neuroscience is a branch of Biology that is rapidly expanding. In psychology, there is also a paradigm of Neuroscience which deals with the study of Neurotransmitters. Neurotransmitters are chemicals within the brain that allows information to be transferred from one point to another thus aiding proper functioning and communication within the brain.
Scientists have found that it is possible to alter neurotransmission with the help of certain chemicals. This helps to correct psychological conditions such as depression. It also helps to manage ambulation problems such as Parkinson disease.
Cheers!
Biological psychology, which explores how biological processes influence behavior and mental states, is most comparable to chemistry within the field of psychology. It involves the study of interactions at a molecular or cellular level, similar to chemistry.
The perspective within psychology that is most comparable to chemistry is biological psychology or biopsychology. This branch of psychology focuses on how biological processes, such as brain function, hormones, and genetics, influence behavior and mental processes. Like chemistry, biological psychology involves the study of the interaction of components at a molecular or cellular level. For example, it will explore the impacts of neurotransmitters (chemical substances) on mood or behavior. So, the same way a chemist would study the interactions and impacts of various chemical substances, a biological psychologist would study the impacts of biological processes on our behavior.
#SPJ3
Answer: The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties.
Explanation:
b.Behaviors and decisions that revolve around the "right thing to do"
c.Following the rules of professional codes and standards
d.What is morally right
e.All of these
Answer:e) All of these
Explanation: Ethics is defined as the principles that helps in conducting the behavior of and individual or group of people. It is the basic governing by the set of rule by business.
Ethics is the based on the right conduct that should be done while in any situation like personal, professional, etc. Ethics maintains that right thing should be done even if there is opposition against it or no support is present for maintaining the correct standard.Thus all the statement given are correct.So the correct option is option (e)
Answer:
This answer is completely personal as it requires analyzing your own personality.
In order for you to achieve this, I will give you the explanation you need.
Strengths:
Psychodynamic theory has several strengths that account for it to be responsive throughout modern psychological thought. First, the impact of childhood on adult personality and mental health is explained. Second, the innate drives that motivate our behavior are explored. It is in this way that she takes psychodynamic theory into account for both sides of the nature / culture debate. On the one hand, it points out the way in which unconscious mental processes are born influencing their thoughts, feelings and behavior. On the other hand, it highlights the influence of childhood relationships and experiences on later development.
Weaknesses:
Despite its advantages, psychodynamic theory has a number of weaknesses, too. In the first place, critics often accuse it of being too deterministic, and therefore it can be denied that people can exercise conscious and free will. In other words, by emphasizing the unconscious and the roots of personality in childhood experience, psychodynamic theory suggests that behavior is pre-determined and ignores the possibility that people have personal action.
Explanation:
When speaking of psychodynamic theories we are therefore speaking of a heterogeneous set of perspectives that have their origin in conceptions of mental processes derived from psychoanalysis.
In this sense, all of them share with Freudian theory the idea that there are intrapsychic conflicts between the conscious and the unconscious, one of the main objectives of therapy being to contribute to making the patient able to understand and manage the unconscious content ( bringing it to consciousness).
In addition, psychodynamic theories also consider the existence of defense strategies and mechanisms used by the psyche to minimize the suffering generated by these conflicts, and they agree that the psychic structure and personality are formed during childhood from satisfaction or dissatisfaction of needs.
Psychodynamic theories and therapies are multiple. Some of the best known are listed below:
In analyzing my own personality based on psychodynamic theories, I would focus on the concepts of the unconscious mind, defense mechanisms, and the role of childhood experiences.
In analyzing my own personality based on psychodynamic theories, I would focus on the concepts of the unconscious mind, defense mechanisms, and the role of childhood experiences in shaping my personality. For example, I might examine how my unconscious desires and fears influence my behavior and thoughts, and how defense mechanisms such as repression or projection manifest in my interactions with others. Additionally, I would explore how my early experiences and relationships with my parents or caregivers have influenced my personality traits and patterns of behavior.
By applying psychodynamic theories to analyze my own personality, I can gain insight into my strengths and weaknesses. For instance, understanding the influence of my unconscious mind can help me recognize any underlying fears or desires that might be affecting my decision-making or relationships. Similarly, recognizing defense mechanisms can help me identify any patterns of avoidance or denial that may be hindering my personal growth. Lastly, exploring my childhood experiences can help me understand the origins of certain personality traits and provide a foundation for personal development.
#SPJ3