Answer:
gfshjddjssx jvskjkjbggdaz ffddcb
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Government needs to fill gap of $64 billions
for economist A
Tax multiplier is 2 so in order to fill a output gap of 64 billions, cut taxes by 64/ 2 = 32 billion
tax have to cut by $32 billions
govt spending multiplier is 8, so spendinh has to increase by 64/8=$8 billions.
for economist B
Tax multipler is 8 so to fill a output gap of 64 billions, cut taxes by 64/ 8= 8 billion
tax have to cut by $8 billions
govt spending multiplier is 4, so spending has to increase by 64/4=$16 billions.
⇒This means that Economist C likely believes that:
- Tax cuts induce investment spending and improve workers incentives.This is because cutting the taxes gives an incentive to the workers to work more.
⇒ A rise in government spending completely crowds out private sector spending, because increased govt spending increases the interest rate, hence private spending is crowded out.
Student Version
To summarize, the elaboration model of instruction starts by presenting knowledge at a very general or simplified level in the form of a special kind of overview. Then it proceeds to add detail or complexity in "layers" across the entire breadth of the content of the course (or curriculum), one layer at a time, until the desired level of detail or complexity is reached.
References:
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 425-453). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
They soon switched to a model based on the elaboration theory (Reigeluth, 1999). Using this approach, the game would begin with a level that offered the simplest version of the whole task (the epitome); subsequent levels would become increasingly more complex--an approach common to videogames--with opportunities for review and synthesis.
References:
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 425-453). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
a)Word-for-Word plagiarism
b)Paraphrasing plagiarism
c)This is not plagiarism
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": This is not plagiarism.
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the act of taking someone else's work and make it appear as if it belongs to another party. It also implies paraphrasing words from an article or changing the order of some of the words to give it a genuine look. Plagiarism is considered a misdemeanor but can be penalized.
The student's version in the example is not plagiarism because the source from where the student takes the reference of the elaboration theory is mentioned:
They soon switched to a model based on the elaboration theory (Reigeluth, 1999).
Thus, the student is recognizing that the conclusion was taken from another resource. The rest of the student's paragraph is related to another field of study - videogames - making a unique version only relating the theory.
Answer:
1. Accountants are ethically obligated to report financial information accurately
2. Reporting using the generally accepted accounting principles underscore on accuracy
3. Loss of confidence, lack of trust on the accounting team, a huge strain on their professional judgement and ethics.
Explanation:
1. Financial information in itself possesses some vital characteristics. One of these is the accuracy of the financial information. As the handler of financial activities, accountants are therefore saddled and ethically obligated to present and prepare their information accurately. This is so as to reflect the true picture of the going in the organization.
2. Reporting using GAAP - Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, seeks to converge the presentation of financial reports and statements on the basis of accuracy. Thus, reliability and relevance are ultimately the foremost objectives of these principles. I therefore have no doubt its usage conveys accuracy of reports.
3. Loss of confidence - financial reports through which the external analyst worked upon are often prepared by the internal staffs. The implication of a wrong and misleading reports from the company is an erosion of confidence on the credibility, reliability and competence of company's preparers of reports.
Lack of trust - The point above ultimately impacts on the level of trust placed on the accuracy, reliability and relevance of financial reports.
Professional Judgement and Ethics - The conducts of the company in presenting a wrong report throws the analyst into an ethnical dilemma, and a huge professional strain. This is not in line with best practices.
Answer:
$32,900 favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the total flexible budget variable overhead cost variance is shown below:
= Total budgeted overhead cost - actual budgeted overhead cost
where,
Total budgeted overhead cost is
= $9.40 × 74,900 hours
= $704,060
And, the actual budgeted overhead cost is
= $8.40 × 79,900 hours
= $671,160
So, the total flexible budget variable overhead cost variance is
= $704,060 - $671,160
= $32,900 favorable
Since the standard cost is greater than the actual cost so it would have favorable variance
b. [$52.3174, $55.6826]
c. [$45.3637, $62.6363]
d. [$47.2695, $60.7305]
Answer:
The 90% confidence interval is c) $45.3637, $62.6363
Explanation:
Hi, since we need to find the Z value from the standard deviation table that would substract an equal area from both size of the normal distribution graph, we can tell that the probability that we have to rate into account is 5% (I mean, 10%, which we substract from both sides 5%), and the Z number for a probability of 5% is -1.645 which is the lower end of the interval, and due to symmetry, the higher end of the interval would be 1.645.
Now, we need to use the following formula in order to find the lower and higher ends of the interval.
Where:
C.L = Confidence Level
Mean = in our case, $54
StdDev = $21
n = sample sizes, in our case, that would be 16
So, the lower level would be
Therefore:
So, the interval in order to have 90% confidence is c. [$45.3637, $62.6363]
The additional spendable income will each investor have if the business is organized as a partnership rather than as a corporation is $22,100.
Income if formed as corporation in hands of each shareholder should be
= 1,000,000 × 10% × ( 1- .34 ) × (1- .35)
= 100,000 × .66 × .65
= $42,900
Now
Income will be taxable in hands of partner = 1,000,000 ×10% ×(1-.35)
= 100,000 ×.65
= 65000
Now
Additional income should be
= $65,000 - $42,900
= $22,100
Learn more: brainly.com/question/24908711?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
$22,100
Explanation:
Calculation for the additional spendable income
First step is to find the Corporation Spendable income amount
Corporate taxes$340,000
($1,000,000*34%)
Income after corporate tax $660,000
($1,000,000-$340,000)
Tax on dividends $231,000
($660,000*35%)
Spendable income $429,000
($660,000-$231,000)
Second step is to find the Partnership Spendable income amount
Taxes paid by business $0
Income received by investors $1,000,000
Taxes paid by partners as personal income $350,000
($1,000,000*35%)
Spendable income $650,000
($1,000,000-$350,000)
Last step is to find the Difference between Corporation Spendable income amount and the Partnership Spendable income amount
Using this formula
Difference in Spendable income=Corporation Spendable income amount - Partnership Spendable income amount
Let plug in the formula
Difference in Spendable income=$429,000-$650,000
Difference in Spendable income=$221,000
Which means that the amount of $221,000 is the
Total gain amount from being a partnership.
Hence, the Individual investor gain will be calculated as $221,000*10%
Individual investor gain=$22,100
Therefore the amount of spendable income that each investor will have if the business is organized as a partnership rather than as a corporation will be $22,100