Answer:
–9 < x – 4 < 9
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
f(-3) = 2 * (-3) + 10
Answer: Option C : delegation of authority
Step-by-step explanation:
the CEO used DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY approach to make restaurant managers accountable for cost-cutting measures in the above case.
The CEO of the Chili restaurant chain used the delegation of authority principle to make restaurant managers responsible for cost-cutting measures without sacrificing customer satisfaction.
In the situation described, the Chili restaurant chain's CEO used delegation of authority to make restaurant managers accountable for cost-cutting measures. Delegation of authority refers to the process of passing down responsibilities and decision-making power from upper to lower levels of management. In this case, the CEO entrusted the restaurant managers with the responsibility of reducing costs, while also maintaining customer satisfaction. Using this strategy, the CEO was able to shift accountability to the managers, who now have the authority to manage their resources and strategize their cost-cutting measures in a manner that would not compromise the level of satisfaction of their customers.
#SPJ3
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
4 is the initial value of the exponential function shown on the graph.
Have a great day
Answer:
25th percentile = 202
80th percentile = 285
Step-by-step explanation:
Rearranging the values in increasing order
164
171
175
202
217
226
231
241
257
261
269
273
285
296
311
N = total number of variables = 15.
25th percentile = [(N + 1)/4]th variable = (15 + 1)/4 = 4th variable.
So, the 25th percentile = 4th variable = 202.
80th percentile = 0.8(N + 1) th variable = 0.8 × (15 + 1) = 12.8th variable = 13th variable = 285
To find the 25th and 80th percentiles for the reaction times, sort the list and determine the corresponding values.
To find the 25th and 80th percentiles for the reaction times in this experiment, we need to first sort the list in ascending order:
The 25th percentile is the value that separates the lowest 25% of the data. In this case, it is the 4th value in the sorted list, which is 202 milliseconds. The 80th percentile is the value that separates the lowest 80% of the data. In this case, it is the 12th value in the sorted list, which is 273 milliseconds.
#SPJ3
(b) How much was deposited?
(c) What is the amount of each withdrawal?
(d) What is the total amount withdrawn?
I get A and C. If you could explain B and D I'd appreciate it.
Answer:
b) $17,400
d) $33,517.20
Step-by-step explanation:
a) $28,482.19 . . . . future value of all deposits
__
b) The initial deposit was $3000, and there were 144 deposits of $100 each, for a total of ...
$3000 +144×100 = $17,400 . . . . total deposited
__
c) $558.62
__
d) 60 monthly withdrawals were made in the amount $558.62, for a total of ...
60×$558.62 = $33,517.20 . . . . total withdrawn
_____
Additional information about (a) and (c)
(a) The future value of the initial deposit is the deposit multiplied by the interest multiplier over the period.
A = P(1 +r/n)^(nt) = 3000(1 +.066/12)^(12·12) = 3000·1.0055^144 ≈ 6609.065
The future value of $100 deposits each month is the sum of the series of 144 terms with common ratio 1.0055 and initial value 100.
A = 100(1.055^144 -1)/0.0055 ≈ 21,873.123
So, the total future value is ...
$6609.065 +21873.123 ≈ $28482.188 ≈ $28,482.19
__
(c) The withdrawal amount can be found using the same formula used for loan payments:
A = P(r/n)/(1 -(1 +r/n)^(-nt)) = $28482.19(.0055)/(1 -1.0055^-60) ≈ $558.62
The total amount deposited in the account was $17,400 including an initial investment of $3,000 and subsequent monthly payments of $100 for 12 years. The total amount withdrawn was equal to the final balance after the last deposit.
Let's tackle each question one by one:
#SPJ2