In the school parking lot there were 113 fewer bikes than cars. There were 185 cars. How many cars and bikes were there in the parking lot? What is the estimated amount?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: There is 185 cars and bike is 72

Related Questions

Piper is going to invest in an account paying an interest rate of 6.1 % compounded continuously
There are​ 15,958,866 adults in a region. If a polling organization randomly selects 1235 adults without​ replacement, are the selections independent or​ dependent? If the selections are​ dependent, can they be treated as independent for the purposes of​ calculations? Are the selections independent or​ dependent?
8.A recipe calls for 4 cups of dry ingredients. Of the 4 cups, 1 cupis flour. What is the ratio of cups of flour to cups ofother dry ingredients used in the recipe? write as a fraction
If a elevator traveled 10 floors in 5 seconds , how many floors did it travel in 1 second ?
The weight, in pounds, of a certain type of adult squirrel is normally distributed with a mean of 4.1 pounds and a standard deviation of 0.5 pounds. What percentage of squirrels have a weight between 3 and 5 pounds?

How many points separated the gold medalist and the fifth place competitor?

Answers

Answer:

10 point separation.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 14 points for gold and 4 points for fifth place.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

26.67

Catherine's employer matches 25% of her 401(k) contributions — up to $2000. Catherine's salary is $50,000, and last year she contributed $10,000 to her 401(k) plan. What was her employer's contribution to the 401(k)?

Answers

We have been given that Catherine's employer matches 25% of her 401(k) contributions or a maximum of $2000. Further we are given that Catherine's salary is $50,000 and she contributed $10,000 to her 401(k) plan.

Let the contribution form her employer be $x. We are given that her employer matches 25% of Catherine's contribution under 401(k) plan. Therefore, contribution made by employer would be either 25% of 10,000 or 2000, whichever is lesser.

Let us find 25% of 10,000.

25\% \text{ of 10000 } = 10,000 * (25)/(100) = \$2500

Since 25% of 10,000 is more than 2000, therefore, Catherine's employer would make a contribution of $2000.

25% of $10,000 is $2,500

But because they only match "up to $2,000," her employers contribution was $2,000

Please only answer if you actually know how to). Some methods for graphing equations work well with certain equations and some don't. Help Asap). Knowing which method to select based on the given equation is a valuable skill. You have learned three methods to graph equations. These methods are: • y = mx+ b, • find intercepts, • use a t-chart. A) Using the following 3 equations, answer the questions: 11x + y =4, x+y = -2, x - 2y = 18. 1) How can you determine which equations can be graphed more easily using x - and y -intercepts, rewriting in slope-intercept form, or using a table of values? 2) Which method works best for you personally? When does it not work as well?​

Answers

Answer:

please dont blame me if i get this wrong this is what i put.

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the following 3 equations, answer the questions:

11x + y =4, x+y = -2, x - 2y = 18

How can you determine which equations can be graphed more easily using x- and y-intercepts, rewriting in slope-intercept form, or using a table of values?

you can determin which is eiser to graph by wether or not they have numbers infront of the x and y intercepts.  i find it mutch eiser if they allready have the numbers there. its also eiser to graph 11x + y =4 and x - 2y =18 on a slope intercept rather than table of values because you allready can find the points for those two eiser than the last one which would be used on the table of values.  for the problem x+y=-2 you would use x and y intercepts. for 11x+y=4, rewriting in slope form is the corect method to use. and finaly use the table of values method for x-2y=18.

Which method works best for you personally? When does it not work as well?

the one that i find works best for me personally is probably gonna be the slope intercept method as apposed to many other methods. it doesnt work all the time because nothing can but normaly when i have a problem with this method i can just go to the table of values method and get the answer. (sorry if this is wrong this is what im putting for my answer. dont copy and paste this though if u do desiede to use it, read it and turn it into your own words so its not obvious you found the answer on the internet. and tbh i didnt read the lesson i just am ok at comming up with answers useing the question and getting away with it. )

In Exercise 5.21, we learned that a Rasmussen Reports survey of 1,000 USadults found that 42% believe raising the minimum wage will help the economy. Construct a 99% confidence interval for the true proportion of US adults who believe this.

Answers

Can you show a pic of the question

Final answer:

The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of US adults believing that raising the minimum wage will help the economy, based on a survey, is approximately (0.386, 0.454).

Explanation:

To compute the 99% confidence interval for the parameter of interest - the true proportion of adults believing that raising the minimum wage will help the economy - we use the formula for the confidence interval for a proportion: p ± Z*(sqrt((p(1 - p))/n)). Here p is the sample proportion, n is the sample size and Z* is the Z score corresponding to the desired confidence level, in this case 99%.

The given sample proportion (p) is 0.42 and the sample size (n) is 1000. The Z score for a 99% confidence interval is approximately 2.58.

Substituting these values into the confidence interval formula yields: 0.42 ± 2.58 * sqrt((0.42(1 - 0.42))/1000). After computation, we obtain the 99% confidence interval as (0.386, 0.454).  

Learn more about confidence interval here:

brainly.com/question/34700241

#SPJ2

Given that a 90% confidence interval for the mean height of all adult males in Idaho measured in inches was [62.532, 76.478]. Use this to answer all parts. What was the point estimate used to estimate the mean height of all adult males in Idaho?

Answers

The point estimate used to estimate the mean height of all adult males in Idaho was 69.505 inches.

Calculation of the estimation of the point

Since Given that a 90% confidence interval for the mean height of all adult males in Idaho measured in inches was [62.532, 76.478].

So, the estimation of the point is

= (62.532 + 76.478) / 2

= 69.505 inches

Learn more about mean here: brainly.com/question/1863752

Answer:

The point estimate used to estimate the mean height of all adult males in Idaho was 69.505 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

The point estimate is the halfway point of the confidence interval, that is, the lower bound added to the upper bound, and then this sum is divided by 2. So

Lower bound: 62.535

Upper bound: 76.478

Point estimate:

P_(e) = (62.535 + 76.478)/(2) = 69.505

The point estimate used to estimate the mean height of all adult males in Idaho was 69.505 inches.

In the figure at the right AB || XY, and m<1 = 120. Tell weather each statement is true or false with #8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17

Answers

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:because it is.