Answer:
10 point separation.
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 14 points for gold and 4 points for fifth place.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Step-by-step explanation:
26.67
We have been given that Catherine's employer matches 25% of her 401(k) contributions or a maximum of $2000. Further we are given that Catherine's salary is $50,000 and she contributed $10,000 to her 401(k) plan.
Let the contribution form her employer be $x. We are given that her employer matches 25% of Catherine's contribution under 401(k) plan. Therefore, contribution made by employer would be either 25% of 10,000 or 2000, whichever is lesser.
Let us find 25% of 10,000.
Since 25% of 10,000 is more than 2000, therefore, Catherine's employer would make a contribution of $2000.
Answer:
please dont blame me if i get this wrong this is what i put.
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the following 3 equations, answer the questions:
11x + y =4, x+y = -2, x - 2y = 18
How can you determine which equations can be graphed more easily using x- and y-intercepts, rewriting in slope-intercept form, or using a table of values?
you can determin which is eiser to graph by wether or not they have numbers infront of the x and y intercepts. i find it mutch eiser if they allready have the numbers there. its also eiser to graph 11x + y =4 and x - 2y =18 on a slope intercept rather than table of values because you allready can find the points for those two eiser than the last one which would be used on the table of values. for the problem x+y=-2 you would use x and y intercepts. for 11x+y=4, rewriting in slope form is the corect method to use. and finaly use the table of values method for x-2y=18.
Which method works best for you personally? When does it not work as well?
the one that i find works best for me personally is probably gonna be the slope intercept method as apposed to many other methods. it doesnt work all the time because nothing can but normaly when i have a problem with this method i can just go to the table of values method and get the answer. (sorry if this is wrong this is what im putting for my answer. dont copy and paste this though if u do desiede to use it, read it and turn it into your own words so its not obvious you found the answer on the internet. and tbh i didnt read the lesson i just am ok at comming up with answers useing the question and getting away with it. )
The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of US adults believing that raising the minimum wage will help the economy, based on a survey, is approximately (0.386, 0.454).
To compute the 99% confidence interval for the parameter of interest - the true proportion of adults believing that raising the minimum wage will help the economy - we use the formula for the confidence interval for a proportion: p ± Z*(sqrt((p(1 - p))/n)). Here p is the sample proportion, n is the sample size and Z* is the Z score corresponding to the desired confidence level, in this case 99%.
The given sample proportion (p) is 0.42 and the sample size (n) is 1000. The Z score for a 99% confidence interval is approximately 2.58.
Substituting these values into the confidence interval formula yields: 0.42 ± 2.58 * sqrt((0.42(1 - 0.42))/1000). After computation, we obtain the 99% confidence interval as (0.386, 0.454).
#SPJ2
The point estimate used to estimate the mean height of all adult males in Idaho was 69.505 inches.
Since Given that a 90% confidence interval for the mean height of all adult males in Idaho measured in inches was [62.532, 76.478].
So, the estimation of the point is
= 69.505 inches
Learn more about mean here: brainly.com/question/1863752
Answer:
The point estimate used to estimate the mean height of all adult males in Idaho was 69.505 inches.
Step-by-step explanation:
The point estimate is the halfway point of the confidence interval, that is, the lower bound added to the upper bound, and then this sum is divided by 2. So
Lower bound: 62.535
Upper bound: 76.478
Point estimate:
The point estimate used to estimate the mean height of all adult males in Idaho was 69.505 inches.
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:because it is.