Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The implementation of total war was a strategy picked by the Union officers for multiple reasons.
1) Total war will result in the destruction of Southern supplies and transportation. Sherman destroys railroad tracks, burns crops, and ruins plantations so that the Southern army/citizens have no resources to survive.
2) It will bring the Civil War to an end much quicker.
Sherman's idea of destroying the South can be viewed as an immoral action. This is due to the fact that Sherman and his troops will be destroying the land and property of individuals who may not even be part of the war or the Confederate war effort.
A different interpretation of historical facts can result from alternate viewpoints, varying sources, and empirical debates. These interpretations can significantly change our understanding of the past, stressing the importance of considering a variety of perspectives and acknowledging the fallibility of our beliefs.
A different interpretation of the facts in history could be the result of alternate lenses or viewpoints. Historical interpretations can drastically change our understanding of past events. For example, considering the evidence from different sources, such as diaries, newspapers, or government records, might provide varying perspectives on a single event. Similarly, our inferences about given facts can vary based on our cultural, social, or personal backgrounds. These deductions provide the pieces of information that we have, with meaning beyond their factual data.
Moreover, differences in interpretation can also arise from empirical debates, where people disagree about what the facts suggest. For instance, two distinct views on the same historical event could be correct based on different interpretations of the same evidence, showing that our perceptions can sometimes misrepresent reality. Therefore, acknowledging a multitude of interpretations, and the potential fallibility of our beliefs, can help us achieve a more nuanced understanding of history.
#SPJ12
A different interpretation of facts refers to the varied ways one can perceive or understand historical events based on the available evidence. Interpretations provide us with different perspectives and understandings of the same event. They help shape our understanding of history and subsequently our world view.
A different interpretation of the facts refers to the unique ways one can view or understand historical events based on the available evidence. When it comes to history, interpretation plays a central role as it allows us to understand the context, consequences, and meanings of past events.
For example, consider a historical event like the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The commonly accepted fact is that it marked the birth of a new nation, the United States. However, a different interpretation might be that it was an act of rebellion against the established order of the time — the British Empire. Both interpretations are derived from the same set of facts but offer different perspectives.
We must remember though that conclusions about what might have been are based on interpretations proposed by the authors of history. Hence, varying perspectives often shape the interpretation of historical 'truths'. These interpretations in turn can influence how we view and interact with the world around us.
#SPJ12
Red Scare
Racial Superiority
Social Darwinism
The two justifications for an imperialist America were Racial Superiority and Social Darwinism.
The two justifications for an imperialist America were Racial Superiority and Social Darwinism.
Racial Superiority is the belief that certain races are inherently superior to others, and therefore have the right to dominate and control other nations. This justification was often used to justify American imperialism and the desire to spread American values and influence.
Social Darwinism is the application of Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to human societies. It suggests that competition among nations is natural and that the fittest nation will rise to dominance. This reasoning was used to justify American expansion and the need to secure resources and markets.
A. the United States invaded Afghanistan
B. a coalition of 39 countries stopped the invasion
C. Iraq defeated Kuwait and made it a controlled territory
D. the United Nations created a resolution that led to a cease-fire
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Ο Α.
OB
OD
Answer:
The answer is c
Explanation:
Iraqi president Saddam Hussein ordered the invasion and occupation of neighboring Kuwait in early August 1990. Alarmed by these actions, fellow Arab powers such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt called on the United States and other Western nations to intervene. Hussein defied United Nations Security Council demands to withdraw from Kuwait by mid-January 1991, and the Persian Gulf War began with a massive U.S.-led air offensive known as Operation Desert Storm. After 42 days of relentless attacks by the allied coalition in the air and on the ground, U.S. President George H.W. Bush declared a cease-fire on February 28; by that time, most Iraqi forces in Kuwait had either surrendered or fled. Though the Persian Gulf War was initially considered an unqualified success for the international coalition, simmering conflict in the troubled region led to a second Gulf War–known as the Iraq War–that began in 2003.
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest♦☺
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Iraq defeated Kuwait and made it a controlled territory
Explanation:
I did this quiz.
Answer:
He did not like how foreigners had control over them. So he decided to break away from Austria. And was successful at doing so.