Apple computer's "smart team" is an example of a firm that succeeded by:

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: It seems that you missed the given choices for this question, but anyway, the answer that would best complete the given statement above is "bringing together a group of talented and experienced managers to conceive, develop, and market products." Apply computer's "smart team" is an example of a firm that succeeded by bringing together a group of talented and experienced managers to conceive, develop, and market products. Hope this answer helps.

Related Questions

A sales tax is a type of progressive tax. indirect tax. proportional tax. direct tax.
The beliefs, attitudes, and behavior associated with a person or group; a way of life.Career Interests Lifestyle Values
Financial discipline means
Michael purchased a condominium unit in the Eagle Rock complex. The complex includes a number of common facilities such as an outdoor swimming pool, recreation center, tennis courts, and walking trails. Under the typical condominium arrangement, these common elements are owned bya. a corporation in which Michael and the owners of the other units in the condominium own stock.b. Michael and the owners of the other units in the condominium in the form of divided interests.c. the association of homeowners in the condominium.d. Michael and the owners of the units in the condominium in the form of undivided percentage interest.
Economists are concerned with an individual's wants because 1. wants always lead to shortages in the economy. 2. needs because economists define needs to be the goods people need to survive. 3. wants because the existence of wants leads to scarcity. 4. needs because needs are most important to an individual's well being.

Lukas believed that his company’s merit pay system would reward him fairly with a higher salary if he worked harder than other employees. His desire to work hard could be explained by the goal-setting theory of motivation.

Answers

Answer:

Equity theory

Explanation:

Equity theory as proposed by John Stacey Adam argues that employees becomes dissatisfied, disgruntled and discouraged when they feel their input into a company does not commensurate with their output in form of salaries, benefit, job security, reputation, recognition, and others. The theory argues that the employees will tend to reduce their inputs and may even become disruptive in their input activities. To circumvent this, the theory argues that employers of labour must find equitable balance between the employees input and their output. This, he belief, when perceived by the employees brings contentment to the employees.

A person, other than a collecting bank or other intermediary, who negotiates a document of title for value:a. warrants to her immediate purchaser that the document is genuine.
b. warrants to all who later take the document that it is genuine.
c. warrants that nothing impairs the document's validity or worth.
d. makes no warranties.

Answers

A person, other than a collecting bank or other intermediary, who negotiates a document of title for value: c. warrants that nothing impairs the document's validity or worth.

About Documents validity

A person who negotiates a document of title for value is essentially transferring ownership of the document to another party. In doing so, they are making a warranty that nothing impairs the document's validity or worth. This means that the document is free from any defects or issues that could affect its value or legitimacy.

This warranty is important because it protects the purchaser from any potential issues with the document that could arise after the transfer of ownership.

It is important to note that the person negotiating the document of title does not make any warranties regarding the document's genuineness (option a and b) or make no warranties at all (option d). The only warranty they make is regarding the document's validity and worth.

Learn more about validity at

brainly.com/question/13012369

#SPJ11

How does gross domestic product (GDP) differ from gross national income (GNI)?A.GDP counts the number of citizens in a country, while GNI counts the number of citizens abroad.
B.GDP measures how happy people are in a country, while GNI measures how happy they are internationally.
C.GDP is used by NASA to measure eroding coastlines, while GNI is used by the FBI to monitor criminal activity across borders.
D.GDP measures the money that a country makes in its own land, while GNI measures the money it makes in other countries and at home.

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "C.GDP is used by NASA to measure eroding coastlines, while GNI is used by the FBI to monitor criminal activity across borders." The gross domestic product (GDP) differ from gross national income (GNI) is that C.GDP is used by NASA to measure eroding coastlines, while GNI is used by the FBI to monitor criminal activity across borders. 

Answer:

The correct answer is option D.

Explanation:

Gross domestic product measures the value of final goods and services produced within the borders of an economy in a given period. It includes consumption expenditure, investment expenditure, government expenditure, and net exports.

While the gross national income measures the value of final goods and services produced within the borders of an economy in a given period and the net factor income from abroad.

The management at Bellows Inc. is faced with a strike threat from union members over a dispute concerning working hours for employees. The disputing parties approach a neutral third party to ensure that the discussions between them are moving forward. The third party, however, has no formal power over union representatives or over management. Which process is best exemplified in the scenario?

Answers

Answer:

mediation

Explanation:

Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the process that is being exemplified in this scenario is known as mediation. This term refers to bringing in an impartial third party in order to assist two disputing parties towards resolving a specific conflict between them. This third part does not necessarily need to have any formal power but must be impartial in order to provide their unbiased opinion.

Answer:

C) conciliation

Explanation:

When a neutral third party gets involved in a collective bargaining dispute involving unions, it can be either a mediator or conciliator depending on the stage of the negotiations.

In this case, since the problem hasn't escalated yet to a strike or or a lockout, the third party involved is a conciliator. Generally a conciliator is called to help the company and the union to reach an agreement before things get complicated.

If the conciliator is not successful, and things start to get messy, then you have to call a mediator. Which can actually be the same person, but just as a medical examiner is a doctor that looks at dead people while a MD treats living people, a mediator gets involved once the fight starts while the conciliator tries to avoid it.

A man conveyed a one-acre parcel of land to a preschool. In the deed, the man stated that the property was to be used only as a playground; the man reserved a right of reentry. What kind of estate has the man granted?

Answers

Answer:

Fee simple subject to a condition subsequent

Explanation:

A fee simple subject to a condition subsequent is quite similar to the fee simple determinable besides that the violation of the condition would give the original owner the option to take back the property. Therfore , the property does not automatically shift to the original owner. Instead, upon violation of the condition, the original owner has the option to regain the right to the property. This option is called a "right of reentry."

Brian wants to buy a mare that he can breed to help develop a horse operation. Larson offers to sell Brian a horse that Larson believes is healthy and should make a good broodmare when a little older. After two years, the horse still has not foaled. The veterinarian tells Brian that the horse is incapable of breeding. If Brian sues to rescind the contract with Larson, it isa. likely that a court will allow the rescission based on a unilateral mistake. b. unlikely that a court will allow rescission based on a mistake of fact. c. likely that a court will allow the rescission based on a mistake of fact. d. unlikely that a court will allow rescission, because Brian made a mistake about market value.

Answers

Answer:

The correct answer is C: likely that a court will allow the rescission based on a mistake of fact.

Explanation:

Brian was not aware of that fact that the horse is incapable of breeding at the point he buys it, but Larson assures Brian the horse is healthy. In this light, if Brian sues to cancel the contract with Larson, the court will allow it based on a mistake of fact. This way the court will reduce any civil liability or criminal culpability because Larson might not know that the horse cannot breed, although he is certain that the horse is healthy.