Answer:
She cites a series of situations that happened in the country and are happening today, justified by laws, which diminish the ability of social minorities to vote.
Explanation:
The author of the article lists a series of laws that have been established in the states that make it difficult for social minorities, especially blacks, to be able to vote regularly. She says that even after the amendments that allowed black men to vote were passed, states have established other laws that prevent blacks from voting, such as requiring voters to read, for example. These laws were established in an increasingly influential manner, until civil rights were passed in the 1960s.
After civil rights, other laws were created every year that made it difficult for blacks, women, the working class, homosexuals to vote among other members of social minorities. Many of these laws still exist today.
The author argues that modern voting laws that may hinder minorities from practicing their civil rights are supported by evidence from scholarly and legal sources. This includes the impact of voter ID laws and restrictions on voting access, the historical context of disenfranchisement, and the ongoing influence of majoritarianism in policymaking.
The author supports her argument that some modern voting laws might be intended to hinder minorities from exercising their civil rights by citing various forms of evidence. First, she cites the work of Sarina Vij from the American Bar Association's Human Rights magazine which highlights the adverse impact of institutional obstacles such as voter ID laws and decreased access to polling places on minorities. Vij's research indicates that non-White individuals who lack government-issued identification and access to polling stations are more likely to be disadvantaged. Access to information about what is on the ballot and where to vote is often withheld from younger, less educated, and non-White voters, contributing to their further disenfranchisement.
Secondly, the author references a 2020 Harvard University study that lists restrictions on voter registration, early voting, student voting, elimination of same-day registration, and unchecked gerrymandering as factors amplifying voter suppression. These restrictions historically find their roots in the United States Jim Crow laws that fiercely excluded Black voters by using literacy tests, poll taxes, and stringent residency requirements.
Finally, the argument underscores the way majoritarianism continues to shape policy-making, with the majority often finding ways to curtail the political participation of minority groups notwithstanding the ratification of amendments to protect voting rights. The repeal of important aspects of the 1965 Voting Rights Act in 2013 and the introduction of new voter ID laws that disproportionately affect minorities supports this fact.
#SPJ11
she
her
Descriptive statistics are useful because you can analyze results and draw conclusions.
A descriptive statistics is a type of statistical analysis that is used to summarize a given data set which cam be the representation of an entire population.
It is very important because it provides basic information about variables in a dataset.
Therefore, descriptive statistics are useful because you can analyze results and draw conclusions.
Learn more about statistical analysis here:
#SPJ2
b. One of the characters is the narrator.
c. The narrator is a mystery.
d. The narrator changes throughout the story
Answer:
D. The narrator changes throughout the story
Explanation:
The first-person narrator can change throughout the story, and character within the story is telling the story. Therefore, the correct answer is d.
b. Pretense
c. Pretension
d. Pretentious
Answer: D) pretentious.
Explanation: the word that correctly completes the given sentence must be an adjective, because it is describing the word "actions." From the given options, the only word that is an adjective is "pretentious," which can be defined as trying to appear or sound more important or clever than you are, especially in matters of art and literature. So the sentence would be: "His actions were rather pretentious in that he did not seem to have the experience that his boasting suggested.
a.
For the upcoming bake sale at the fair, we bake the cake and frosted it.
b.
For the upcoming bake sale at the fair, we baked the cake and frosted it.
c.
For the upcoming bake sale at the fair, we baked the cake and had frosted it.
d.
For the upcoming bake sale at the fair, we will have baked the cake and frost it.
Went hammer and tongs at the prayers for the dying"
The poet used the phrase "went hammer and tongs" most likely to imply that
a) he is beating his bible while reading to the mother
b) he is speaking the words loudly and with great force
c) the son does not agree with the priests religious views of death
d) the mother is slipping away and takes comfort in prayers from her family
Answer:
The poet used the phrase "went hammer and tongs" most likely to imply that he is speaking the words loudly and with great force.
Explanation:
The meaning of the expression "went hammer and tongs" is that a person does something with great vigor, determination, or vehemence, which matches with the line that says he is speaking loudly and with great force, it seems like a paraphrased sentence with the same context and conveys the same mood and idea.