Answer:
A lot of information is missing, so I looked for similar questions:
since 1,064 is the perimeter and we have a rectangle, we can write the perimeter equation as: 2L + 2W = 1,064
area = L · W
2W = 1,064 - 2L
W = 532 - L
now we replace in the area equation:
area = (532 - L) · L = -W² + 532W (quadratic equation format)
the value of L as our X coordinate:
L = 532 / 2 = 266
W = 532 - 266 = 266
area = -(266)² + (532 x 266) = -70,756 + 141,512 = 70,756 sq yards
or
area = 266 · 266 = 70,756 sq yards
When you have a rectangle, the largest possible area is a square, where both sides have the same length.
b. Only CPF solutions can be optimal, so the number of optimal solutions cannot exceed the number of CPF solutions.
c. If multiple optimal solutions exist, then an optimal CPF solu-tion may have an adjacent CPF solution that also in optimal.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The given statement is true as the corner point at the objective function should be feasible solution which is no longer as compared with the value for every adjacent CPF solution as compared with its optimal
b. The given statement is false as the solution can be an edge
c. The given statement is true as it shows the direct relation between the two things
In linear programming problems, CPF solutions can be optimal and if multiple optimal solutions exist, an optimal CPF solution may not have an adjacent CPF solution that is also optimal.
a. True: For minimization problems, if the objective function evaluated at a CPF solution is no larger than its value at every adjacent CPF solution, then that solution is optimal. This is because in a minimization problem, the goal is to find the solution that minimizes the objective function.
b. True: Only CPF solutions can be optimal, so the number of optimal solutions cannot exceed the number of CPF solutions. CPF stands for Corner-Point Feasible, which means solutions that lie on the corner points of the feasible region.
c. False: If multiple optimal solutions exist, an optimal CPF solution may not have an adjacent CPF solution that is also optimal. This is because adjacent CPF solutions may have different objective function values.
#SPJ12
Answer:
$874
Explanation:
Calculation for Simon's additional Medicare tax
Based on the information given we were told Simon has a MAGI of the amount of $223,000 in which part of it is for wages income of the amount of $185,000 ($223,000 -$38,000)
while the amount of $38,000 is the net investment income which means that Samson MAGI is below the threshold limit of the amount of $200,000, therefore tax rate of 3.8% tax will be applied.
Now let calculate the additional Medicare tax
Additional Medicare tax = ($38,000-$15,000)*3.8%
Additional Medicare tax =$23,000*3.8%
Additional Medicare tax = $874
Therefore Simon's additional Medicare tax is:874
Simon's additional Medicare tax is $207. This is calculated by taking 0.9% of his income that exceeds the $200,000 threshold for single filers, which equals to $23,000 in Simon's case.
The student, Simon, needs to calculate his additional Medicare tax. As his MAGI, or Modified Adjusted Gross Income, is $223,000, he surpasses the threshold for single filers, which is $200,000. Therefore, the additional Medicare tax would apply to his income above this limit.
The Additional Medicare Tax is set at 0.9%, and it applies to the amount that exceeds the threshold. For Simon, this excess is $23,000 ($223,000 - $200,000). So, Simon's Additional Medicare Tax is 0.9% of $23,000, which calculates to $207.
In the context of Medicare taxes, it's important to remember that the tax rates are designed to increase as the income increases. Unlike the Social Security tax, there is no upper ceiling on the Medicare tax. The purpose of Medicare is to provide health care for the elderly.
#SPJ3
Answer:
False
Explanation:
If one of your firm's customers is "stretching" its accounts payable, this may be a nuisance but it does not represent a real financial cost to your firm as long as the customer periodically pays off its entire balance.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
-Centralized decision making allows the organization to place tighter controls on the way work is done and, in the process, achieve economies of scale
Answer:
Narrow spans of management ensure that employees operate efficiently.
Centralized decision making allows the organization to place tighter controls on the way work is done and, in the process, achieve economies of scale.
Explanation: When the spans of management is narrow, proper supervising and controlling and coordination of work is done to achieve effective and efficient work done by the Employees.
A centralised decision making process helps the Organisation to have a tight control on its spendings and in the way work is done, this will help the Organisation to cut cost and take strategic decisions for organisational growth and development.
Answer:
a. 162,750 gallons
b. 168,000 gallons
Explanation:
Step 1 Determine the Units of Closing Work In Process Inventory
Units of Closing Work In Process = Beginning inventory units + units Started this month - units Transferred out
= 30,000+180,000-157,500
= 52,500
Step 2 Determine the equivalent units for materials
Note : materials are 10 percent complete in Units of Closing Work In Process
Units of Closing Work In Process ( 52,500 ×10%) = 5,250
Units Transferred out ( 157,500 ×100%) =157,500
Total =162,750
Step 3 Determine the equivalent units for conversion costs
Note : conversion costs are 20 percent complete in Units of Closing Work In Process
Units of Closing Work In Process ( 52,500 ×20%) = 10,500
Units Transferred out ( 157,500 ×100%) =157,500
Total =168,000
Answer:
The equivalent units for conversion costs using the weighted-average method are 168,000
The equivalent units for materials using the weighted-average method are 162,750
Explanation:
onlon Chemicals
Equivalent units can be calculated by the following
Particulars Units % of Completion Equivalent Units
Mat. Con. Costs Materials C. Costs
Transferred out, 157,500 100 100 157,500 157,500
Ending inventory, 52,500 10 20 5250 10,500
Total Equivalent Units 162,750 168,000
Working
Ending Inventory= Opening + Started - Transferred Out
Ending Inventory=30,000 +180,000 -157,500 = 52,500 gallons
The equivalent units are calculated by two ways either by adding ending inventory and transferred out units or by adding beginning inventory with units started.