Decsion making ability is based on logics and explanations. Jennifer's conclusion may be based on the availability heuristic making her thoughts to be biased.
The availability heuristic is a biased nature that depends on rapid instances that influences the decision-making ability when the specific topic related to the situation or the person comes to mind of the person.
Gary's insensitive nature and personality makes Jennifer biased in her thought and tricks her into thinking that he is not good for her.
Deductible reasoning is the progression of the opinions towards the conclusion and anchoring bias is based on the information presented first.
Therefore, Jennifer's conclusion may be based on the availability heuristic.
Learn more about the availability heuristic here:
Answer:
reaction formation
Explanation:
Reaction formation: In psychology, the term "reaction formation" is referred to as one of the different psychological defense mechanisms whereby an individual tends to go beyond denial and often behaves in an opposite manner to what she actually feels or thinks. The conscious behaviors are being adopted to "overcompensate" the anxiety of an individual associated with the "socially unacceptable" unconscious emotions or thoughts.
In the question above, the given statement represents reaction formation.
–“Diary of the Operations against Pensacola,”
Bernardo de Gálvez
Which statement best explains Gálvez’s intentions for the remainder of the siege?
He vows to protect the city at all costs even if it means losing the fight.
He intends to keep fighting until Campbell surrenders, even if the city burns.
He declares his troops will go into hiding to escape the fires Campbell has set.
He plans to honor their agreement to protect the city, even if Campbell does not.
Answer:
B: He intends to keep fighting until Campbell surrenders, even if the city burns
Explanation:
Answer:
the correct answer is B: He intends to keep fighting until Campbell surrenders, even if the city burns
Explanation:
mark brainliest pls
b. businesses producing goods and products slowly
c. a decline in the American consumer culture
d. employees suffering lower wages
⇒ I have 1414 points soo
Answer:
I think it's B. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry
Answer: C
Explanation:
Answer: Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right
Explanation:
Killing is not an easy thing to do, but there is a great difference between self-defense and outright killing, but either ways, someone will definitely die. Nathanson says that there is no way to respect the dignity of both people’s right.
Nathanson argues that killing in self-defense is compatible with the respect for the dignity of human life by upholding the right to bodily autonomy and moral considerations. Killing in such circumstances is seen as a response to an immediate threat to one's life and not as an act of aggression.
The explanation of how Nathanson argues that killing in self defense is compatible with respect for the dignity of human life lies in the concept of the sanctity of human life, the right to bodily autonomy, and moral and rational considerations. According to Nathanson, killing in self-defense is morally justified when one's life is in immediate threat or danger. In such cases, the dignity of human life is respected as the act of self-defense is carried out in preservation of one's own life.
Nathanson suggests that every individual has a right to bodily autonomy – the right of individuals to determine what happens to their bodies. When the life of an individual is threatened, they have the right to defend themselves, which may at times involve killing as a last resort. This act of killing is seen as a response to an immediate danger and not as an act of aggression.
Moreover, Nathanson's argument can also be connected to moral reasoning. He doesn't argue that killing is generally acceptable, but rather, only under very specific circumstances such as self-defense where it's seen as the lesser of two evils. Thus, recognizing the sanctity and dignity of human life while also acknowledging situations where self-defense is necessary involves a complex interplay of moral, ethical and personal considerations according to Nathanson.
#SPJ11
the list.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because in landlocked country they used aeroplane for transportation which is very expensive
Answer:
explain the symbolic interaction theoretical perspective to the material explained in "merchants of cool"
Answer:
The answer is- Ride it out, because conflict from adolescents is normal and beneficial.
Explanation:
Conflict can happen when family members have different views or beliefs, misunderstanding or when someone in the family jumps into a wrong conclusion. It is normal to disagree from time to time and occasionally conflict is a part of family life. If issues of conflict are not resolved peacefully it can lead to argument and resentment.
However they can provide opportunity for learning and improving relationships. There are certain benefits of conflict which include;