Answer:
Complexity ⇒ electric cars are affected by complexity. Chargers for electric cars are not easily found in small cities, which makes it difficult for people living on small towns to own an electric car.
Compatibility ⇒ when Apple launched the iPad, most of its consumers already owned an iPhone which made their use much more simple, natural and compatible.
Relative advantage ⇒ hybrid cars are much more fuel efficient than regular gas cars and that is an advantage when consumers are comparing the costs of owning and using a car.
Trialability ⇒ free lotion samples given away in supermarkets are an example of trialability. Potential consumers can use try them and if they like them they will purchase them. Another example is the one month free trials for online services.
Observability ⇒ when Apple launched the first iPhone, the Blackberrry phone was the most popular. But as people were able to observe the advantages of the iPhone, they quickly changed their phones.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Develop findings.
Explanation:
The Marketing Research Approach is a study carried out to contribute to the decision-making of a company mainly over the introduction of a new product. The approach has five (5) steps: define the problem, develop findings, collect relevant data and information, analyze the information, and take action.
After recognizing what the problem is and clearly know what the study will focus on, the next step implies developing findings. At this stage, different kind of information is collected and studied to determine if they would be useful for the research or at least provide an idea of what is happening related to the issue that causes the research.
The adjusting entry should Fred make on December 31, the end of the accounting period is: Debit Insurance Expense $6,000; Credit Prepaid Insurance $6,000.
Based on the information given the appropriate journal entry to record the transaction is:
Fred company adjusting entry
Debit Insurance Expense $6,000
Credit Prepaid Insurance $6,000
( $2,000 x 3 = $6,000)
Inconclusion the adjusting entry should Fred make on December 31, the end of the accounting period is: Debit Insurance Expense $6,000; Credit Prepaid Insurance $6,000.
Learn more about journal entry here:brainly.com/question/14279491
Answer:
The adjusting entry Fred should make on December 31, the end of the accounting period:
b. Debit : Insurance Expense 6,000 Credit: Prepaid Insurance 6,000
Explanation:
On October 1, Fred Company paid $48,000 for a two-year insurance policy, ($2,000 per month)
From October 1 to December 31, Fred Company has used the insurance for 3 months.
Insurance Expense = $2,000 x 3 = $6,000
The adjusting entry Fred should make on December 31, the end of the accounting period:
Debit Insurance Expense $6,000
Credit Prepaid Insurance $6,000
Answer:
3.8%
Explanation:
3 year bonds yielding 3.2%
6 year bonds yielding 5.0
Annual pay bond 4 years
Yielding bond+[(Annual pay bond- Bonds years)/bond years]×(Yielding bond-Yeilding bonds)
Let plug in the formula
Interpolating: 3.2% + [(4 - 3) / (6 - 3)] × (5.0% - 3.2%)
=3.2%+[1/3×(1.8%)]
= 3.2%+(0.33333×1.8%)
=3.2%+0.006
=0.032+0.006
=0.038×100
=3.8%
Alternatively,
Interpolating: 3.2% + [(4 - 3) / (6 - 3)] × (5.0% - 3.2%) =3.8%
In this case the analyst should estimate a YTM for the non-traded bond that is closest to: 3.8%
b. If an employee's wages are reduced by $4,000 and the employee is in the 15% marginal tax bracket, the employee would benefit from the offer.
c. If an employee's wages are reduced by $6,000 and the employee is in the 35% marginal tax bracket, the employee would benefit from the offer.
d. a., b., and c.
e. None of these.
Answer:
d. a., b., and c.
Explanation:
Reduction in pay (a) Marginal tax (b) Reduction in tax (c = a x b)
A. $5000 0.28 $1,400
B. $4000 0.15 $600
C. $6000 0.35 $2100
Reduction in After-tax Income (d = a - c)
A. $3,600
B. $3,400
C. $3,900
this means that all the above a, b, and c options are correct because in all the three cases, the reduction in after-tax pay of the employee will be less than $4000 value of the nontaxable insurance premium to be paid by the employer which would ultimately benefit the employee.
Answer:
$20,000
Explanation:
Time difference from the "Purchase date" to "Sale date" = 9 years (1/1/2007 to 1/1/2016)
Given that, in the 9 years, Troy rented the home for first 5 years (1/1/2007 to 1/1/2012), and lived in the home as his principal residence for next 1 year(1/1/2012 to 31/12/2012)
and again rented out the home for 1 year (1/1/2013 to 31/12/2013), and again started to lived in the home as his principal residence for next 2 years. (1/1/2014 to 1/1/2016)
i.e. when we look at the last 5 years before the sale of house, Troy has lived 3 years in the home as his principal residence.
And Troy has acquired the home for $300,000 and not acquired by "like kind exchange" of property.
As per IRS rules, a owner must live at least 2 years in the home as his principal residence & home must not be acquired by 1031 exchange (like/kind exchange).
Here, Troy satisfies both conditions. (He has lived more than 2 years, and not acquired by like/kind exchange)
So, as per above rules, Troy's home sale is eligible for Maximum exclusion of $250,000 gain (being Troy is Single)
Here, as per IRS rules, Gain = Amount Realized / Adjusted Basis = $320,000 - $300,000 = $20,000.
But, being Troy home sale is eligible for Maximum exclusion of $250,000, this $20,000 gain is deducted and Net Gain = $0.
Troy's gain on the sale of his home is $20,000. However, he is eligible to exclude this gain from taxation because he lived in the home as his principal residence for 2 out of the 5 years leading up to the sale, as per IRS guidelines.
Troy's gain on his home sale depends on his usage of the property and the IRS's rules on excluding gains from the sale of a principal residence. According to these rules, a person can generally exclude the gain up to $250,000 from the sale of a principal residence if they owned the house and lived in it as their main home for at least 2 out of the last 5 years before the sale. The years of ownership and use don't need to be consecutive.
Troy purchased the home in 2007 and sold it in 2016. He rented the home initially then lived in it as his principal residence, then rented it again, and lived in it again until the sale. Combining these periods, he lived in the house as his principal residence for only 3 years (2012, 2014, 2015). However, these years are within the 5-year window before the sale (2012-2016).
Troy's recognized gain is the selling price of the home minus the purchase price. Thus, his recognized gain is $320,000 - $300,000 = $20,000. However since he lived in the residence for 2 out of the 5 years before the sale, this gain is excluded from taxation, according to IRS rules.
#SPJ13
Options:
a. 14.58%
b. 12.83%
c. 15.46%
d. 16.33%
e. 16.92%
Answer:
Correct option is A.
14.58%
Explanation:
After-tax yield = pre-tax yield x (1- marginal rate)
and Taxable-equivalent yield = tax-exempt yield / (1- marginal tax rate)
Hence Taxable-equivalent yield =.105/(1-.28)
=.105/.72=.14583333
=14.58 %