Answer:
direct labor-hours per unit
Explanation:
A labor budget is prepared to determine the business` need for planned labor in the budget period.
It can be prepaid to show :
All of this also applies for a unit production.
Answer:
An employee of a company who is being paid to assist in the sale of stock options to the company's employees and receives a bonus based on sales results is referred to as an Agent. This is in accordance with Uniform Securities Act.
Explanation:
The Uniform Securities Act refers to an employee of a company who is paid to assist in the sale of stock option to the company's employees and receives a bonus based on sales results as an agent. Such an employee is required to register with the state.
the law in pursuit of free music. In reality hardcore fans "are extremely enthusiastic about paid-for services, as long as they are suitably compelling, he said.
People who download unlicensed music tend not buy legal digital music.
A True
B False
C Cannot Say
The answer to the prompt that "People who download unlicensed music tend not buy legal digital music" is False.
Judging from the passage above, the answer to this prompt is false.
The passage makes it clear that those who regularly downloaded unlicensed music also "spent an average of £5.52 a month on legal digital music."
This shows that this crop of individuals are willing to purchase legal digital music.
Learn more about unlicensed music here:
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
The diluted earnings per share for Garfun, Inc. considering the income and preferred dividends, the income from Simon, Inc. given the tax rate, and the potentially diluted convertible bonds from Simon, Inc., it comes out to be $6.58.
Calculating diluted earnings per share (EPS) involves accounting for any securities or methods that could potentially dilute the EPS, such cy as convertible bonds. In this scenario for Garfun, Inc., first, we need to address Garfun's net income (exclusive of investment income). This is given as $480,000. However, they pay preferred dividends of $15,000, which are subtracted from net income when calculating EPS, so we’ll use $465,000 as the income available to common stockholders.
Moving on to Simon, Inc., as Garfun owns all of the stock of Simon, the earnings of Simon will fully contribute to the diluted earnings of Garfun. Taking the reported net income of Simon ($290,000) and adjusting for the 30% tax rate, we get $203,000.
Furthermore, the potentially dilutive securities are the convertible bonds from Simon, Inc. These bonds can be converted into 30,000 shares of common stock ($100 bonds * 3). The interest paid for these convertible bonds, $80,000, is added back to the net income after being adjusted for the tax rate of 30% which is $56,000.
The total of earnings available for common stockholders for the diluted EPS calculation is, therefore $724,000 ($465,000 of Garfun’s net income + $203,000 of Simon’s net income + $56,000 interest on Simon’s bonds adjusted for tax). We also need to account for all the common stocks where earnings will be distributed. This amounts to 110,000 shares (80,000 of Garfun’s shares + 30,000 shares of Simon’s bonds). Hence, the diluted EPS is $6.58 ($724,000 / 110,000).
#SPJ2
Answer:
Also a hard skill.
Explanation:
A hard skill is something that you have to learn.
B. a reduction of expenditures.
C.another financing source.
D. matured interest payments.
Answer: C. Another Financing source
Explanation:
The fund was received for the purpose of debt service. Debt service means repayment of loans. The funds were utilized for debt servicing. Hence, the amount should be reported as another financing source.
The objective of the funds was to repay loans and the amount was received for repayment. This amount was used to finance their debt service. So it was a financing source for the company.
2)It is a legal cross-licensing agreement.
3)It is an illegal tying arrangement.
4)It is an illegal cross-licensing agreement.
5)It is both a legal tying and a legal cross-licensing agreement.
Answer:
3) It is an illegal tying arrangement.
Explanation:
Tying is said to be an illegal arrangement where, for one to buy a product, the consumer must purchase another product that exists in a separate market. There isn't any legal backing but things work out well for all parties involved.