Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
5(-2x -10) = 25(x + 1)
-10x - 50 = 25x + 25
by transposing
-10x - 25x = 25 + 50
-35x = 75
x = -75/35
x = 15/7
or 2.142857..... in decimal
Hope this helps
plz mark as brainliest!!!!!!!
rate of growth of a population with a birth rate of 30births per
1000 and a death rate of 20 deaths per 1000?
Answer:
10 growth per 1000.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
Rate of birth = 30 births per 1000
Rate of death = 20 deaths per 1000
As the growth in population is the difference in the number of the child take birth and the person die.
As we are calculating the rate of birth and rate of growth in per thousands of members, so the growth rate will be also in per thousands.
As we can see on every one thousand people,
total birth = 30
total death = 20
so, total growth = total birth - total growth
= 30 - 20
= 10
As at every 1000 persons, there are 10 persons survive, so the rate of growth will be 10 growth per 1000.
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
9 is dividsible by 3 so every number divisable by nine is also divisable by three.
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
Because 3 is a factor of 9.
O A. 4,/25
B. 2V50
O C. 5,2
O D. 10
SUBMIT
Answer:
D.10
Hope you could get an idea from here.
Doubt clarification - use comment section.
Answer:
nearest integer 27 by 4
From the confidence interval given, we have that the correct option is:
It would be less than 0.05.
At the null hypothesis, we test that there are no changes, that is, the means are equal, so:
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there was a change, that is, if the means are different, so:
.
The confidence interval for the difference of means is: (2.177, 4.977).
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/22968227
Answer:
It would be less than 0.05.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis test was done to claim that the weight of participants has changed.
The null and alternative hypothesis could be written as:
being μ the population mean change in weight.
With that information, we can tell that is a two tailed test. Sample means that fall in any of the tails, with a z-statistic over 1.96 or under -1.96 (at a significance level of 0.05), will be evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
The information we have about the sample is the 95% confidence interval calculated from the sample information.
This confidence interval does not include the value μ=0.
Then, there is 2.5% of probabiltity that the population mean is under 2.177, the lower bound of the interval, which includes the value μ=0.
With this information, we can conclude that the P-value have to be under 0.05.
Answer:
(the statement does not appear to be true)
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't think the statement is true, but you CAN compute the intercepted arc from the angle.
Note that BFDG is a convex quadrilateral, so its angles sum to 360. Since we know the inscribed circle touches the angle tangentially, angles BFD and BGD are both right angles, with a measure of 90 degrees.
Therefore, adding the angles together, we have:
alpha + 90 + 90 + <FDG = 360
Therefore, <FDG, the inscribed angle, is 180-alpha (ie, supplementary to alpha)