Answer:
I write this letter to talk to you about your nephew Jhonny and to emphasize the importance of having you as a support for his academic life.
As you may already know, Jhonny is a spectacular teenager who shows a strong talent for English and literature classes, although he has difficulties in other subjects, which is normal for most young people. We all believe that Jhonny has a bright future ahead of him, but unfortunately he has no resources of his own to move forward with his dreams, needing a lot of your support.
You more than I know that Jhonny cannot count on his parents to support his studies, since you are the closest and most important relative in this regard. Adult support is highly important for academic development and a promising future professional life.
I am sure that Jhonny is very grateful for everything you do for him and is very sad and shaken by the possibility of losing his support, but he has difficulties in telling you, which motivates me to write this letter.
I appreciate your understanding and hope that I have managed to change your opinion.
Kind regards,
Agatha Melly.
Explanation:
When a person dies without a will, their assets are distributed based on state intestacy laws. The state courts would handle a will contest in this scenario, and the court in the state where the deceased person resided would likely hear the case.
When a person dies without a will, it is referred to as dying intestate. In such cases, the court will distribute the assets based on state intestacy laws. Each state has its own set of laws that determine who will receive the property. In this scenario, where your uncle's ex-wife claims to have a valid will, it would be up to the state courts to handle the case.
State courts have jurisdiction over probate matters, including will contests. They have the authority to determine the validity of the will and decide how the estate should be distributed. The court in the state where your uncle resided at the time of his death would be the most likely to hear the case.
#SPJ12
b. False
The choices are:
Sociological
Law and Economics
Command
Irrational Forces
Legal Realism
Answer:
The answer is: Sociological School of Jurisprudential Thought
Explanation:
The "Sociological" School of Jurisprudential Thought approaches the law in accordance to society. This means that the people in the society is the main source of law. This gives everyone a balance welfare and equal opportunities.
"Affirmative action" falls under this approach. This action supports those people who are disadvantaged. This considers the person's race, gender, religion, etc. when it comes to opportunities in the society. It gives an equal access to the minority groups. In the situation of Avery town above, the law on the employment for people who are transgender and homosexual individuals fall under this approach.
Thus, this explains the answer.