9. What ultimately happened to Clarence Earl Gideon?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Accused of committing a robbery, Gideon was too poor to hire a lawyer to represent him in court. ... After he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison, Gideon took his case to the U.S. Supreme Court


Related Questions

The typical first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation is called:A. RemediationB. The adjudicationC. The auditD. The inquiry
How is formal authority distinguished and give examples of each characteristic from the SAA case
I NEED THE CORRECT ANSWER TO THIS ASAP AS IN RIGHT NOW!!!! Which of the following shows the most likely order that a case would take through the federalcourt system? A) Supreme Court --> Appeals Court --> District Court B) District Court --> Appeals Court --> Supreme Court C) District Court --> Supreme Court --> Appeals Court D) Appeals Court --> District Court --> Supreme Court
Revocation is the withdrawal of an offer by the offeror. True or False
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?

What comes before the Articles of the Constitution?​

Answers

Answer:

In terms of the order of sections in the Constitution, the Preamble comes before the Articles.

Though is you are asking what document was used in American government before the Constitution, The Articles of Confederation were used.

Explanation:

Order of the Constitution: Preamble, Article I, Article II, Article III, Article V, Article VI, and Article VII.

Before the Constitution was established in 1788, America's first attempt at a government was the adoption of the Articles of Confederation

The Preamble comes before the constitution

A meeting could begin as a lawful assembly butdevelop into an unlawful one.

True
False

Answers

Answer: True

Explanation:

Which of the following are not negotiable instruments?A) Certified cheque B) Cheques C) Promissory note D) Bill of sale

Answers

Answer:

Che ques are not generally negotiable instruments in California. If you are talking about another state then the answer may vary.

Explanation:

If the police arrive at Larrys office without probable cause or a warrant and demand to search the premises, which amendment protects him from this type of search?

Answers

Answer:

the 4th amendment.

Answer:

the fourth amendment

One day, police officers were involved in a high-speed chase through city limits after a driver sped through a school zone. When they finally caught up with the driver, the police immediately arrested Betty at the scene. Because Betty was arrested at the scene and without a warrant, the court may hold a hearing during the first appearance to determine whether there was probable cause to arrest her. This hearing is known as:

a. Richardson hearing
b. Allen hearing
c. Lewis hearing
d. Gerstein hearing

Answers

Answer:

d. Gerstein hearing

Explanation:

  • Gerstein hearing is a process of hearing in which a court may summon an individual over criminal charges based on probable cause. The procedure of charging an individual with a criminal suit through a reasonable belief that the arrested individual is a potential criminal is called probable cause.
  • An individual may be summoned by a court for a Gerstein hearing even without a warrant to determine whether there was a probable cause to arrest his/her.

In the United States v. Park, was this corporate executive defendant held criminally liable for failing to ensure the company's compliance with the law?a. That the defendant could not be held liable because it could not be proven by a reasonable doubt that he knew warehouse employees were failing to take proper steps to ensure sanitary conditionsb. That the defendant could not be held liable because it could not be proven by a preponderance of the evidence that he knew warehouse employees were failing to take proper steps to insure sanitary conditionsc. That the defendant could not be held liable because he did not personally cause the contaminationd. That the defendant could be held liable because he hid evidence of the offensese. That the defendant could be held liable because he failed to see that those delegated the duty to ensure sanitary conditions did their job

Answers

Answer:

The answer is letter E.

Explanation:

That the defendant could be held liable because he failed to see that those delegated the duty to ensure sanitary conditions did their job.