Answer and Explanation:
a. The given statement is true as the corner point at the objective function should be feasible solution which is no longer as compared with the value for every adjacent CPF solution as compared with its optimal
b. The given statement is false as the solution can be an edge
c. The given statement is true as it shows the direct relation between the two things
In linear programming problems, CPF solutions can be optimal and if multiple optimal solutions exist, an optimal CPF solution may not have an adjacent CPF solution that is also optimal.
a. True: For minimization problems, if the objective function evaluated at a CPF solution is no larger than its value at every adjacent CPF solution, then that solution is optimal. This is because in a minimization problem, the goal is to find the solution that minimizes the objective function.
b. True: Only CPF solutions can be optimal, so the number of optimal solutions cannot exceed the number of CPF solutions. CPF stands for Corner-Point Feasible, which means solutions that lie on the corner points of the feasible region.
c. False: If multiple optimal solutions exist, an optimal CPF solution may not have an adjacent CPF solution that is also optimal. This is because adjacent CPF solutions may have different objective function values.
#SPJ12
Cash $47,000 $25,000
Accounts Receivable, Net 99,000 62,000
Merchandise Inventory 79,000 50,000
Property, Plant, and
Equipment, Net 181,000 120,000
Total assets $406,000 $257,000
Additional information:
Net sales $530,000
Cost of Goods Sold 150,000
Interest expense 24,000
Net income 181,000
Calculate the return on total assets for the year 2015.
A. 62.03%.B. 45.79%.C. 50.74%.D. 71.98%.
Answer: 61.84%
Explanation:
The Return on Assets is a ratio that measures how effectively assets are being utilized to earn revenue.
The formula is;
Return on total Asset = Operating Income /Average Total assets
Operating Income = Net Income + Interest expense = 181,000 + 24,000 = $205,000
Average Total Assets = (Beginning Assets + Ending Assets) / 2 = (406,000 + 257,000) / 2 = $331,500
Return on Assets = 205,000/331,500 = 61.84%
The options listed are most probably for a variant of this question.
B. Treat the loss as a subsequent event and adjust the 2019 financial statements to record the loss on uncollectible accounts.
C. Treat the loss as a subsequent event and provide a footnote about the loss in the 2019 financial statements.
D. File a lawsuit against the customer in hopes of collecting some of the money owed to the client.
Answer:
The correct answer is Option B.
Explanation:
Based on IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Period, subsequent events can be an adjusting event or non-adjusting event. If it is an adjusting event, it means an event after the reporting date before the audited financial statements are signed that provides further evidence of conditions that existed at the reporting date. However, non-adjusting events are events after the reporting date that are indicative of a condition that arose after the reporting date, this requires disclosure in the financial statements while for adjusting events, the financial statements are adjusted for condition that arose after the reporting date.
The declaration of the customer as bankrupt is an adjusting event since it affects the receivable collection, hence the need to adjust it as uncollectible,
Answer:
d) 6.33
Explanation:
The computation of the expected dividend a year from now is shown below:
As we know that
Price of the stock = Expected dividend ÷ (Required rate of return - growth rate)
Expected dividend = Price of the stock × (Required rate of return - growth rate)
= $63.25 × (0.17 – 0.07)
= $6.325
hence, the correct option is d. $6.33
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
Bacccialy and a circle on every card that has a multiple of 5 storage in your room and the black and white and black kitten will also have the same as ad the perimeter on a separate page with the instagram same on the same floor and there is is a approximate usage electricity bill and some of them will not have been paid been paid for while we have not been able link to the mass of tin is it for 100 and the black bin bags etc for the late reply night and last of all Rail season tickets to London increased by the time we get back from amazon then please let let me go and collect it from amazon on Sunday and then send it back again as I am now back in the stock office on Monday so I can tell the other people who have a look at our page page are interested in the our website ready to for us the other ones in with our and a couple other bits of paper with the name Bob
Explanation:
Follow the story and the first one will is a approximate usage approximate date of the line for the late submission date of your submission for the late reply yes to the first day of the contract for the first day in September as the application will be made on the 1st September at your latest address so that we may be able link to the
Answer:
Blume's formula combines the geometric and arithmetic means of an asset to be able to predict its returns in a given period.
The formula is;
= Geometric Mean*(T-1)/(N-1) + Arithmatic Mean *(N-T)/(N-1)
Where;
T = Period in question
N = Total period
10 years
= 8.3%*(10-1)/(90-1) + 10.3%*(90-10)/(90-1)
= 10.1 %
25 years
= 8.3%*(25-1)/(90-1) + 10.3%*(90-25)/(90-1)
= 9.76%
30 years
= 8.3%*(30-1)/(90-1) + 10.3%*(90-30)/(90-1)
= 9.65%
Answer:
The options are
A) as small as possible; all
B) equal; all
C) equal; normal
D) maximized; all
The answer is B) equal; all
Ricky not being in a consumer equilibrium and he considering the prices prices of goods means he allocated all his income in such a way that entails his marginal utility per dollar spent is equal for all goods.
This is to ensure that he cuts cost and maximizes his spending power.