Answer:
The answer is $88
Step-by-step explanation:
The Math.random () function returns a floating-point, pseudo-random number in the range 0–1 (inclusive of 0, but not 1) with approximately uniform distribution over that range — which you can then scale to your desired range.
Jon decides to renew and will now pay $11.72 monthly per thousand on his loan. You can ignore the small amount of principal that has been paid.
What is the amount of the old monthly payment? $ ____
What is the amount of the new monthly payment? $ ____
What is the percent of increase in his new monthly payment? ____ %
Remark
The first fact you need to know is that the bank has taken money from you and nothing has been reduced from the principle. Crafty people those bankers; you are going to pay off the interest before touching the principle. They're like you to refinance for the rest of your life at the rates you currently have.
Point. You started out with a 50k debt. You still have that same debt.
Solution
Givens
number of thousands (n) = 50000/1000 = 50
Amount paid per thousand (A) = 10.67
Total monthly payments (T) = ?
Part A
T = n * A
T = 50 * 10.67
T = 533.50 is the old monthly payment
Part B
T = n * A
T = 50 * 11.72
T = 586.00 new monthly payment.
Part C
This is a notes question. What have you been told in your notes on this question. You can find the raw amount just by subtracting 586 - 533.50 = 52.50
But how do you find the % increase. Which one of the payments do you use as your base?
In point of fact, you should be using the first number 533.5
What % will you get when you multiply that by 533.5 and get 52.50?
You are not trying to find 586. You are trying to find the number that you add to 533.5 to get to 586
The answer is (52.50 / 533.5)*100% = 9.84% is the % increase.
You are told to ignore the amount of principal paid, so you are apparently to assume the loan amount was for $50 thousand.
a) The old monthly payment was $10.67×50 = $533.50
b) The new monthly payment is $11.72×50 = $586.00
c) The increase in monthly payment is figured in the usual way:
... (new/old -1)×100% = (1.0984-1)×100% = 9.84%
_____
In reality, about 3% of the loan will have been paid at the end of 2 years. Thus, the original loan amount may have been near $51,500. This problem is telling you to ignore the difference.
Answer: 0.25
Step-by-step explanation:
The relative frequency of the customers that buy computers is equal to the number of customers that bought a computer divided the total number of customers that entered the shop.
p = 25/100 = 0.25
If we take this as the probability, then the probability that the next customer that enters the shop buys a computer is 0.25 or 25%
The probability that the next customer will purchase a computer, computed using the relative frequency method, is 0.25 or 25%.
The subject at hand relates to the basic concept of probability, specifically the method of computing probability using the relative frequency approach. This is a common topic within high school Mathematics, specifically within statistical studies.
To calculate the relative frequency probability of an event, one divides the number of times the event occurred by the total number of trials. In this case, the event is a customer purchasing a computer from the shop. Given that the event has occurred 25 times out of the last 100 trials (customers entering the shop), the relative frequency probability can be computed as follows:
Probability = (Number of times event occurred) / (Total number of trials) = 25 / 100 = 0.25 (or 25% when expressed as a percentage).
Therefore, using the relative frequency method of computing probability, the probability that the next customer will purchase a computer is 0.25 or 25%.
#SPJ3
The value of \(x\) that makes the equation true is
To find the value of \(x\) that makes the equation true, you need to simplify the equation and solve for \(x\). Let's break down the steps:
1. **Distribute the -5 on the left side:**
2. **Move the constant term (100) to the right side by subtracting 100 from both sides:**
3. **Finally, divide both sides by -5 to solve for \(x\):**
To verify, substitute \(x = 13\) back into the original equation:
The equation is true when \(x = 13\).
For more such questions on equation
#SPJ3
Answer:
x=13
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide both sides by -5 then solve the equation for x
A.
Upper H 0 : p less than 0.5
Upper H 1 : p equals 0.5
B.
Upper H 0 : p greater than 0.5
Upper H 1 : p equals 0.5
C.
Upper H 0 : p equals 0.5
Upper H 1 : p not equals 0.5
D.
Upper H 0 : p equals 0.5
Upper H 1 : p less than 0.5
E.
Upper H 0 : p not equals 0.5
Upper H 1 : p equals 0.5
F.
Upper H 0 : p equals 0.5
Upper H 1 : p greater than 0.5
What is the test statistic?
Z =
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)
What is the conclusion about the null hypothesis?
A. Reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.
B. Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, alpha.
C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.
D. Reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, alpha.
What is the final conclusion?
A.There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.
B.There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.
C.There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.
D.There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A. Upper H 0 : p equals 0.5
Upper H 1 : p not equals 0.5
B. Using the tests promotion formula, we have (p - P) / √P(1-P)
Where p (sample promotion) = 494/788 = 0.6269, P (population proportion) = 0.5,
(0.6269 - 0.5) / (√0.5(1-0.5))
0.1269/ √(0.5 (0.5))
0.1269/ √0.25
0.1269/0.5
Test statistics is equal to 0.2538
C. We will use the p value to determine our result, thus the p value at 0.05 level of significance is 0.79965, thus we fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.
Then we conclude that There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed.