term.
f(n) = 1.25n +3.75; 20
20 is the
th term.
Answer:
13th term
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the 13th term, if you plug in 13 for n and solve you would get 20 :)
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
sin(180-x) - sin(x)
= sin(180) × cos(x) - cos(180) × sin(x) - sin(x)
= 0 × cos(x) - (-1) × sin(x) - sin(x)
= 0 + sin(x) - sin(x)
= 0
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one:
given data
time takent= 3.5hours
distance = 60.9miles
the average speed is given as
Average speed= distance/time
Average speed= 60.9/3.5
Average speed= 17.4mph
Step two:
we are told that the speed was actually maintained, so we used the previous value obatained for the following computation
For a time taken as 1 hour, the distance will be
distance= average speed * time
distance= 17.4*1
distance= 17.4 miles
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation: A cyclist rode for 3.5 hours and completed a distance of 60.9 miles. If she kept the same average speed for each hour, how far did she ride in 1 hour?
From the given equation we have x=z and t=z. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
Given that, lines k, l, and m intersect at a point.
Vertical angles theorem or verticallyopposite angles theorem states that two opposite vertical angles formed when two lines intersect each other are always equal (congruent) to each other.
From the given figure,
Using vertical angle theorem, we have
x°=t°
y°=u°
w°=z°
If x + y = u + w, then
x+u=u+z
⇒ x=z
If x + y = u + w, then
t+u=u + z
⇒ t=z
So, x=z and t=z
From the given equation we have x=z and t=z. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
To learn more about the vertical angle theorem visit:
#SPJ2
Answer:
B)
Step-by-step explanation:
First, let's write down what we know based on the Vertical Angle Theorem and the info given by the question:
1. Vertical angle theorem claims that opposite angles are the same, therefore:
2. We know from the problem that:
3. Now for the proofing:
Since x+y = u+w, let us try to cross off the variable u and see if we can get x equaling to w.
We know that y=u, so let us switch out y for another u, allowing the same variable to cross out
x+y = u+w --> x+u = u+w --> x=w
Ok now we know x=w, and recall that w=z. So x would also equal to z!
Let us try to proof z=t:
We know that x=t
But now we also know that x=z (from previous)
Therefore we can substitute the z in for x in x=t and voila z=t!
Try finding out if y=w. No matter how many equations you create, they are not the same. It would not make sense either if you use this equation: x+y = u+w. If w and x are the same then y cannot be anything except being equal to "u". We cannot prove that u is equal to anything else either.
Therefore the answer is B)