Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the logical statement is
"If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c"
we can see that a must divide one either b or c from the statement above
A) If a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
This is False because a can divide b or c
B) If a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
this is True for a to divide bc it must divide b or c (either b or c)
C) If a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b.
This is True since a can divide bc and it cannot divide c, it must definitely divide b
D) If a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c.
This is True since a can divide bc and it cannot divide b, it must definitely divide c
E) a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c.
This is False for a to divide bc it must divide one of b or c
Statement A is not the same as the original statement.
Statement B is the negation of the original statement.
Statement C is the same as the original statement.
Statement D is not the same as the original statement.
Condition E is not a statement, but a set of conditions without any logical implications.
Given that;
The conditional statement:
If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c
A) If a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
This statement is not the same as the original conditional statement.
The original statement states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.
However, statement A states the opposite - if a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
So, this is not the same as the original statement.
B) If a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
This statement is actually the negation of the original conditional statement.
The original statement states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.
The negation of this statement would be that if a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
So, statement B is the negation of the original statement.
C) If a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b.
This statement is the same as the original conditional statement. It states that if a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b.
This is equivalent to the original statement, which states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.
D) If a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c.
This statement is not the same as the original conditional statement.
The original statement states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.
However, statement D states that if a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c.
This is a different condition altogether, so it is not equivalent to the original statement.
E) a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c.
This is not a statement but rather an additional condition specified.
It describes a scenario where a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c.
However, it doesn't provide any logical implications or conclusions like the conditional statements we have been discussing.
Therefore, we get;
Statement A is not the same as the original statement.
Statement B is the negation of the original statement.
Statement C is the same as the original statement.
Statement D is not the same as the original statement.
Condition E is not a statement, but a set of conditions without any logical implications.
To learn more about the divide visit:
#SPJ3
(b) What is the probability that the ball chosen from box B is 12 if the arithmetic mean of the three balls selected is exactly 7?
Answer:
a) 0.73684
b) 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
part a)
Using conditional probability as above:
(A,B,C)
Cases for numerator when:
P( A is 1 and exactly two balls are 1) = P( 1, not 1, 1) + P(1, 1, not 1)
=
Cases for denominator when:
P( Exactly two balls are 1) = P( 1, not 1, 1) + P(1, 1, not 1) + P(not 1, 1 , 1)
Hence,
Part b
Cases for denominator when:
P ( A + B + C = 21) = P(5,12,4) + P(6,11,4) + P(6,12,3)
Cases for numerator when:
P (B = 12 & A + B + C = 21) = P(5,12,4) + P(6,12,3)
Hence,
s(x)=x²-2
Find the value of r(s(-4)).
4,426 4,905 4,822 4,383 4,956
5,043 4,038
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
6 and 7
Step-by-step explanation:
I think you mean 'the sq rt of 48 lies between what 2 integers.'
The answer is 6 and 7.
If a 4000 watt oven is on for 5 hours, then how many kilowatt-hours (kw-hrs) of energy are used?
Solution: We are given that the oven is 4000 watt and it is on for 5 hours.
We have to find the how many kilowatt-hours (Kw-hrs) of energy are used by the oven.
We first need to convert watts into kilowatt's. We know that:
Therefore, 4000 Watts
Now, we can find how many kilowatt-hours (Kw-hrs) of energy are used by the oven.
Energy used by the oven Kw-hrs
Therefore, 20 kilowatt-hours (kw-hrs) of energy are used by the oven.