Let a, b, and c be integers. Consider the following conditional statement: If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c
Which of the following statements have the same meaning as this conditional statement, which ones are the negations, and which ones are not neither? Justify your answers using logical equivalences or truth tables.
A) If a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
B) If a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.
C) If a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b.
D) If a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c. (e) a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the logical statement is

"If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c"

we can see that a must divide one either b or c from the statement above

A) If a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.

This is False because a can divide b or c

 B) If a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.

this is True for a to divide bc it must divide b or c (either b or c)

C) If a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b.

This is True since a can divide bc and it cannot divide c, it must definitely divide b

D) If a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c.

This is True since a can divide bc and it cannot divide b, it must definitely divide c

E) a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c.

This is False for a to divide bc it must divide one of  b or c

Answer 2
Answer:

Statement A is not the same as the original statement.

Statement B is the negation of the original statement.

Statement C is the same as the original statement.

Statement D is not the same as the original statement.

Condition E is not a statement, but a set of conditions without any logical implications.

Given that;

The conditional statement:

If a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c

A) If a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.

This statement is not the same as the original conditional statement.

The original statement states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.

However, statement A states the opposite - if a does not divide b or a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.

So, this is not the same as the original statement.

B) If a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.

This statement is actually the negation of the original conditional statement.

The original statement states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.

The negation of this statement would be that if a does not divide b and a does not divide c, then a does not divide bc.

So, statement B is the negation of the original statement.

C) If a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b.

This statement is the same as the original conditional statement. It states that if a divides bc and a does not divide c, then a divides b.

This is equivalent to the original statement, which states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.

D) If a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c.

This statement is not the same as the original conditional statement.

The original statement states that if a divides bc, then a divides b or a divides c.

However, statement D states that if a divides bc or a does not divide b, then a divides c.

This is a different condition altogether, so it is not equivalent to the original statement.

E) a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c.

This is not a statement but rather an additional condition specified.

It describes a scenario where a divides bc, a does not divide b, and a does not divide c.

However, it doesn't provide any logical implications or conclusions like the conditional statements we have been discussing.

Therefore, we get;

Statement A is not the same as the original statement.

Statement B is the negation of the original statement.

Statement C is the same as the original statement.

Statement D is not the same as the original statement.

Condition E is not a statement, but a set of conditions without any logical implications.

To learn more about the divide visit:

brainly.com/question/28119824

#SPJ3


Related Questions

How many units away is 1 from -6 on a number line?-7-557
Is this right? please correct me if I'm wrong.
A manufacturer knows that their items have a normally distributed length, with a mean of 13.1 inches, and standard deviation of 4.1 inches. If 25 items are chosen at random, what is the probability that their mean length is less than 11.1 inches
There are two spinners containing only black and purple slices.Spinner A has 3 black slices and 12 purple slices.All the slices are the same size.Spinner B has 2 black slices and 6 purple slices.All the slices are the same size.Each spinner is spun.List theseſevents from least likely to most likely.Event 1: Spinner B lands on a black slice.Event 2: Spinner A lands on a black slice.Event 3: Spinner B lands on a black or purple slice.Event 4: Spinner A lands on a green slice.Least likelyMost likelyEvent |Event |Event |Event []
7/9 and 5/7 does this ratio form a proprtion? yes or no?

A is 30% of b. b is 90% of c. what % of c is a

Answers

A = 30% of B = 0.3B
B = 90% of C = 0.9C

A = 0.3(0.9C) = 0.27C = 27% of C

Consider three boxes with numbered balls in them. Box A con- tains six balls numbered 1, . . . , 6. Box B contains twelve balls numbered 1, . . . , 12. Finally, box C contains four balls numbered 1, . . . , 4. One ball is selected from each urn uniformly at random. (a) What is the probability that the ball chosen from box A is labeled 1 if exactly two balls numbered 1 were selected
(b) What is the probability that the ball chosen from box B is 12 if the arithmetic mean of the three balls selected is exactly 7?

Answers

Answer:

a) 0.73684

b) 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

part a)

P ( A is 1 / exactly two balls are 1) = (P ( A is 1 and that exactly two balls are 1))/(P (Exactly two balls are one))

Using conditional probability as above:

(A,B,C)

Cases for numerator when:

P( A is 1 and exactly two balls are 1) = P( 1, not 1, 1) + P(1, 1, not 1)

= ((1)/(6)* (11)/(12)*(1)/(4))  + ((1)/(6)*(1)/(12)*(3)/(4)) = 0.048611111

Cases for denominator when:

P( Exactly two balls are 1) = P( 1, not 1, 1) + P(1, 1, not 1) + P(not 1, 1 , 1)

= ((1)/(6)* (11)/(12)*(1)/(4))  + ((1)/(6)*(1)/(12)*(3)/(4)) + ((5)/(6)*(1)/(12)*(1)/(4))= 0.0659722222

Hence,

P ( A is 1 / exactly two balls are 1) = (P ( A is 1 and that exactly two balls are 1))/(P (Exactly two balls are one)) = (0.048611111)/(0.06597222) \n\n= 0.73684

Part b

P ( B = 12 / A+B+C = 21) = (P ( B = 12 and A+B+C = 21))/(P (A+B+C = 21))

Cases for denominator when:

P ( A + B + C = 21) = P(5,12,4) + P(6,11,4) + P(6,12,3)

= 3*P(5,12,4 ) =3* (1)/(6)*(1)/(12)*(1)/(4)\n\n= (1)/(96)

Cases for numerator when:

P (B = 12 & A + B + C = 21) = P(5,12,4) + P(6,12,3)

= 2*P(5,12,4 ) =2* (1)/(6)*(1)/(12)*(1)/(4)\n\n= (1)/(144)

Hence,

P ( B = 12 / A+B+C = 21) = ((1)/(144) )/((1)/(96) )\n\n= (2)/(3)

R(x) = -x+2
s(x)=x²-2
Find the value of r(s(-4)).

Answers


Answer: r(s(-4)) = -12

Twelve different video games showing substance use were observed and the duration of times of game play​ (in seconds) are listed below. The design of the study justifies the assumption that the sample can be treated as a simple random sample. Use the sample data to construct a 98​% confidence interval estimate of sigma​, the standard deviation of the duration times of game play. Assume that this sample was obtained from a population with a normal distribution.4,757 4,509 4,221 4,486 4,935   
4,426 4,905 4,822 4,383 4,956
5,043 4,038

Answers

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Between which two integers does the square root of 48 lie? *

Answers

Answer:

6 and 7

Step-by-step explanation:

I think you mean 'the sq rt of 48 lies between what 2 integers.'

The answer is 6 and 7.

If a 4000 watt oven is on for 5 hours, then how many kilowatt-hours (kw-hrs) of energy are used?

Answers

If a 4000 watt oven is on for 5 hours, then how many kilowatt-hours (kw-hrs) of energy are used?

Solution: We are given that the oven is 4000 watt and it is on for 5 hours.

We have to find the how many kilowatt-hours (Kw-hrs) of energy are used by the oven.

We first need to convert watts into kilowatt's. We know that:

1Kw=1000 w

Therefore, 4000 Watts =(4000)/(1000)=4Kw

Now, we can find how many kilowatt-hours (Kw-hrs) of energy are used by the oven.

Energy used by the oven =4 * 5=20 Kw-hrs

Therefore, 20 kilowatt-hours (kw-hrs) of energy are used by the oven.