Answer: 11
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Type II error
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's remember the definition of Type I error and Type II error:
A type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis, this means that we would get a "false positive" with this error.
A type II error is the non rejection of a not true null hypothesis, this error would give us a "false negative".
In this problem the mean number of insect parts per 100 grams is 75. However, the test fails to show that this number is greater than 75 when it is, this means that the test is not detecting these insect parts and therefore is giving a "false negative"
Thus, this is a Type II error.
This situation is an example of a Type II error. This occurs when the test fails to reject the null hypothesis when it should be rejected. In this context, it means the test was unable to detect the actual average content of insect parts is higher than the allowable limit.
The situation presented constitutes a Type II error in the field of hypothesis testing in statistics. A Type II error occurs when the tester fails to reject the null hypothesis when it should be rejected. In this context, it means the test failed to show that the mean number of insect parts per 100 grams is greater than 75, when in fact, it is. This can potentially mean allowing more contaminated flour into the market because the test did not pick up on the true mean being higher than 75 insect parts per 100 grams.
#SPJ11
Answer:
88 cars
Step-by-step explanation:
8x-3x=5x
40 cars = 5x
divide both sides by 5
x=8 cars
8x+3x=11x
11x=88 cars altogether
ex– 1 = 9
Answer:
x = ln 10
Step-by-step explanation:
You meant e^x - 1 = 9. Let's isolate e^x, by adding 1 to both sides. We get:
e^x = 10
Now make use of the property ln a = b <=> a = e^b
Then e^x = 10 becomes
x = ln 10
Based on the amount that Adrian spent in total, the cost without taxes was $86.50.
The cost of the clothes was $93.42 including tax.
Assuming the original cost is x, the equation is:
Total cost = Original cost x ( 1 + tax)
Solving would give:
93.42 = x × (1 + 8%)
93.42 = 1.08x
x = 93.42 / 1.08
= $86.50
In conclusion, the cost without taxes was $86.50.
Find out more at brainly.com/question/17836987.
Answer:
85.95
Step-by-step explanation:
If the local tax was 8% and we want to know what is was without the tax then we need to do 93.42 times .92
Since money only goes to the hundredths place we need to round there