Answer:
Yes the statement does
Explanation:
Retaining small predictable layers of risk and transferring the unpredictable catastrophic layer of risk to a more capable body is a very good approach towards promoting appropriate risk financing decision making, this is because
Financial risk decisions are decisions taken between alternatives i.e risks associated with business activities . it is more appropriate to take alternatives with a predictable layer of risk,that way it would be easier for the management to handle the risk associated with it, while transferring the unpredictable catastrophic layer of risk to a more capable body ,like the Insurance companies .
Answer:
The cost of goods manufactured for July is $ 232,000
Explanation:
Raw Materials Inventories Utilized In Production
Beginning Raw materials $ 41,000
Add Purchases $ 73,000
Less Ending Raw materials ($ 37,000)
Used in Production $ 77,000
Cost of goods manufactured
Raw Materials $ 77,000
Direct labor cost $ 98,000
Manufacturing overhead $ 65,000
Total Cost of Manufacturing $ 240,000
Add Opening Work in process $ 23,000
Less Ending Work in process ($ 31,000)
Cost of goods manufactured $ 232,000
Not that Manufacturing overhead are included to the amount Applied in the Manufacturing Cost
Answer:
The demand curve for wine shifts to the right
Explanation:
As per the forecast, there should be a decline in grape harvest. This induces the buyers to purchase more quantity of grapes in an anticipation of decline in future harvest which would eventually make grapes costlier than now.
Production of wine depends upon the availability of inputs. Grape being one of the necessary inputs. This means if in future, price of grapes rise, the production of wine would be costlier, which would raise the price of wine.
As a consequence of such an announcement, the wine market would experience an immediate increase in demand for wine which would shift the demand curve to the right.
Answer:
c) $767,464.54
Explanation:
The computation of the future value of an annuity is shown below:
As we know that
Future value of annuity F = Payment made × ((1 + rate of interest)^t - 1) ÷ rate of interest
= $3,400 × (1.092^35 - 1) ÷ 0.092
= $3,400 × 225.7249
= $767,464.54
Hence, the future value of an annuity is $767,464.54
Therefore the correct option is c.
Noma will have $767,464.54 in 35 years.
To calculate the future value of Noma's savings, we can use the formula for compound interest: FV = P(1 + r)^t, where FV is the future value, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, and t is the number of years. In this case, Noma plans to save $3,400 per year for 35 years with an annual interest rate of 9.2 percent. Plugging these values into the formula:
FV = 3400 * (1 + 0.092)^35
Calculating this expression, Noma will have a future value of $767,464.54 in 35 years.
#SPJ3
Answer:
If I am a employer of fb,my strategy will be that I will hire machine learning engineer to solve automation problem,I will give them skills if employer don't hire after education.
Answer:
An employee of a company who is being paid to assist in the sale of stock options to the company's employees and receives a bonus based on sales results is referred to as an Agent. This is in accordance with Uniform Securities Act.
Explanation:
The Uniform Securities Act refers to an employee of a company who is paid to assist in the sale of stock option to the company's employees and receives a bonus based on sales results as an agent. Such an employee is required to register with the state.
Answer:
$105.60
Explanation:
Given: Total dividend paid= $1100000.
Retained earning= $3300000.
Number of outstanding shares= 725000.
PE ratio= 17.4 times.
First finding earning per share.
Formula;
⇒
⇒
∴
Hence, earning per share (EPS)= $6.07.
Now, finding the appropriate stock price.
Price of stock=
⇒ Price of stock=
∴ Price of stock=
Hence, $105.60 would be the appropriate price of stock.