Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation:
A cost driver refers to the activity that causes an actual change in the cost of a transaction and by extension it's local cost.
For example, cost driver of labor would be the number of people working or cost driver of Electricity paid would be the actual number of units consumed.
In the above, the products and services mentioned are the integral activities for those firms so they are cost drivers to those firms.
b.A better divisional performance measure would be the rate of return on investment
c.A better divisional performance measure would be the residual income.
d.None of these choices would be included.
e.All of these choices (a, b & c) would be included.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
In simple words, method of performance division is considered to be effective when it depicts a true picture, not because it gives a sound position of the organisation as waned by the managers.
Thus, reticulation should not be done. Also, Divisional performance should be judged by some other aspects like time taken to perform the job or wastage done by them etc.
Answer:
Because they're two different people
Explanation:
The main and major reason why, is the obvious one. The first reason that comes to the mind.
Because they are two different people. Different people have different goals, hopes and aspirations. And even those that share them go through different paths while carrying them out. The minds of the two individuals are not the same, and despite the fact that they have similar abilities, they might not necessarily get the job done on time because of other commitments either of them have. Even if they both have none, there's always a distinguishing factor, and that will always trump, thus making them have different expectancies for performing at a high level.
$277,062
B.
$252,838
C.
$113,550
D.
$163,512
Answer:
D.$163,512
Explanation:
Depletion expense is a charge against profits for the use of natural resources.
Depletion rate = cost to purchase resource/ number of units = $530,000/ 35,000 tons = $15.14 per ton
Depletion expense for 2019 = Depletion rate * number of units extracted and sold in 2019 = $15.14 * 10,800 = $163,512
Answer:
Alternative A has lower incremental revenue but it's lower incremental costs makes the net income higher than of Alternative B.
Explanation:
Alternative A
The net income is computed with the formula as:
Net Income = Incremental Revenue - Incremental Cost
= $160,000 - $100,000
= $60,000
Alternative B
The net income is computed with the formula as:
Net Income = Incremental Revenue - Incremental Cost
= $180,000 - $125,000
= $55,000
Alternative A has lower incremental revenue but it's lower incremental costs makes the net income higher than of Alternative B.
Assuming the company is considering two alternatives. Alternative A to Alternative B net income is: $60,000; $55,000.
Alternative A Alternative B Net Income Increase (Decrease)
Revenues $ 160,000 $100,000 $60,000
($160,000-$100,00)
Costs $180,000 125,000 $55,000
($180,000-$125,000)
Inconclusion Alternative A to Alternative B net income is: $60,000; $55,000.
Learn more about net income here:brainly.com/question/26264551
Answer:
If disposable income increases by $5 billion and consumer spending ... spending by $100 billion and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.8. ... Suppose investment spending increases by $50 billion, and as a result real GDP increases by $200 billion. ... deliberate changes in taxation and/or government spending.
Explanation:
Answer:
The highest acceptable manufacturing cost for which Sid's would be willing to produce the cover is $19.60
Explanation:
The computation of the highest acceptable manufacturing cost is shown below:
We know that the market priced at $24.50 and the operating profit is 25% of the cost, we assume the cost is 100 and the selling price equals to
= Cost + operating profit
= 100 + 25% × cost price
= 125
The market price is given for selling price but we have to compute for the cost price
So, the calculation would be
= $24.50 × 100 ÷ 125
= $19.60
The maximum manufacturing cost per unit for Sid's Skins to achieve a 25% profit margin is $19.60.
The question is asking for the maximum manufacturing cost Sid's Skins would be willing to incur per unit produced in order to achieve a 25 percent operating profit. To solve this, the formula cost = price / (1 + profit margin) is used, where the price is $24.50 and the desired profit margin is 0.25 or 25%.
By substituting these values into the formula, the calculation is as follows: cost = 24.50 / (1 + 0.25) = 24.50 / 1.25 = $19.60.
So, the maximum manufacturing cost per unit that Sid's Skins would be willing to endure in order to achieve their desired profit margin of 25 percent is $19.60.
#SPJ3