Answer:
Required rate of return = 10.75%
Explanation:
The value of a stock using the dividend valuation model, is the present value of the expected future dividends discounted at the required rate of return. The required rate of return is the cost of equity
The model is represented below:
P = D× (1+g)/ ke- g
Ke- cost of equity, g - growth rate, p - price of the stock
This model can used to work out the cost of equity, as follows:
Ke = D× (1+g)/p + g
Ke = (1.48× 1.05)/27 + 0.05
Ke= 0.107555556
Required return = 0.1075 × 100 = 10.75
Required rate of return = 10.75%
Answer:
service is doing work to someone,:
----is supplying public a public needs example: tramsport
-----is emplyment as a servant
-------perios of employment with company or organization
$4 379 83
54 739 95
$5.076.55
Answer: $4,379.83
Explanation:
Given the following details:
Periodic payment = $550
Interest rate = 11%
Number of periods = 20 years
Present Value (PV) = P[(1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r]
Where
P = periodic payment = $550
r = Interest rate = 11% = 0.11
n = number of periods = 20
PV = 550[(1 - (1 + 0.11)^-20) / 0.11]
PV = 550[(1 - (1.11)^-20) / 0.11]
PV = 550[(1 - 0.1240339) / 0.11]
PV = 550[0.8759660 / 0.11]
PV = 550(7.9633281)
PV = 4379.8304
PV = 4379.83
Answer:
The question is: "What is the maximum initial cost the company would be willing to pay for the project?"
The maximum initial investment cost the company would be willing to pay for the project is $18,817,204.
Explanation:
We have D/E = 0.8 => D/ (D+E) = 4/9; E/(D+E) = 5/9.
WACC of the firm = 4/9 x 4.3% + 5/9 x 11.5% = 8.3%.
Adjustment for cost capital due to higher risk of the project: 8.3% + 3% = 11.3%.
=> Maximum initial investment cost is equal to the net present value of the cash saving the project brings about discounting at project's cost of capital, calculated as:
1,750,000/ (11.3% - 2%) = $18,817,204.
Thus, the Maximum initial investment cost is $18,817,204.
Answer:
The actual usage of materials was less than the standard allowed.
Explanation:
Based on these variances, one could conclude that the actual usage of materials was less than the standard allowed because the Company planned to produce 3,000 units of its single product during November in which the standards for one unit of the product specify six pounds of materials at $0.30 per pound but at the end the Actual production in November was 3,100 units instead of 3,000 unit which was planned .
Therefore Materials quantity variance = (AQ - SQ) SP.
A favorable materials quantity variance can occurred in a situation where the actual usage of materials was less than the standard allowed which is AQ < SQ.
Answer:
Explanation:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
=
where,
Carrying cost = $20 × 15% = 3
And, the annual demand = 450 bicycles × 12 months × 2 tyres = 10,800
And, the ordering cost is $50
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
=
= 600 tires
b. The number of orders would be equal to
= Annual demand ÷ economic order quantity
= $10,800 ÷ 600 tires
= 18 orders
c. The average annual ordering cost would equal to
= Number of orders × ordering cost
= 18 orders × $50
= $900
The Economic Order Quantity for the company is around 240 units. This leads to an estimated 23 orders per year with an average annual ordering cost of $1150.
The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) is calculated using the equation √((2DS)/H). In this example, D represents the demand rate which is the number of bicycles produced a year (450 per month times 12, totaling 5400). S represents the ordering cost ($50) and H represents the holding cost which is 15% of the tire cost ($20) per unit, totaling $3 per unit.
So if you substitute these values into the formula, the EOQ equals √((2 * 5400 * 50)/3), which results in approximately 240 units. From this solution, the number of orders per year would be the annual demand divided by the EOQ, i.e., 5400 / 240 giving approximately 22.5 orders (rounded upwards it means 23 orders per year). The average annual ordering cost would be the cost per order times the number of orders per year (23 * $50), resulting in $1150.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Explanation:
Return on investment (ROI) can be defined as a performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency of an investment or to compare the efficiency of a number of investments.
The ability to calculate return on investment is particularly valuable for any business regardless of its size or industry. by calculating ROI, an individual can understand how well their business is doing and which areas needs improvement.
Every business decision requires knowldge of ROI, so as to optimize profitability. Yes it is acceptable to loose profit of one product for the sale of a profitable product because the gain that would be derived by selling an extremely profitable products is better for the company that the gain one product will derive. Afterall, every company wants to increase profitability.