Answer:
The p value for this case would be:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=100 represent the random sample taken
X=36 represent the number of people that take E supplement
estimated proportion of people who take R supplement
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true proportion is equatl to 0.39 or not, the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info we got:
The p value for this case would be:
For this case since the p value is higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion is not different from 0.39
o 53
o 133
o 127
o 47
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that a function
We have to find the derivative of the function
Differentiate w.r.t x
By using formula
by using
Hence, the derivative of function
Answer: The required derivative is
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
We need to derivative it w.r.t 'x'., using "Chain rule"
As we know that
So, it becomes,
Hence, the required derivative is
Answer:
I think the answer is "6" but I could be wrong.
Answer:
do better and kick butt ( lol) srry not helpful but just what I thought
Step-by-step explanation:
she would pay $2,450 down and $175 each month. At another dealer, she would pay $3,050 down and
$150 each month. After how many months would the total amount paid be the same for both dealers?
What would that amount be?
After months Kenya will have paid $ for the bike at elther dealer. PLS HELP ASAP