Answer:
what
Explanation:
B. humans and animals existed on the same level.
C. Shakespeare didn't actually write the plays we think he did.
D. love is an illusion.
The word shot has a powerful connotation that enhances Laertes' argument by evoking imagery and emotions. It carries meanings of a projectile, chance, and urgency, creating impact in the message.
The word shot, as used in the passage, makes Laertes’ argument more effective because it has a powerful connotation that evokes imagery and emotions. In this context, the word shot carries multiple meanings and associations which contribute to the impact of Laertes' argument. For example, a shot can refer to a projectile fired from a weapon, implying a sudden and decisive action. It can also represent a chance or opportunity which, when missed, may result in regret or loss. By using the word shot, Laertes is able to convey a sense of urgency, determination, and potential consequences, making his argument more persuasive.
#SPJ3
Answer:
This is an excerpt from Henry David Thoreau’s seminal essay “Civil Disobedience.
He is of the opinion that casting your vote is not the end of the democratic process. He is advocating civil disobedience and a participatory democracy.
Furthermore, although your vote might be overwhelmed by the majority, you still have a moral obligation to ensure a better leadership. It must exceed just the ballot
The sentence provides an abstract view of voting, portraying it as a game of chance with moral considerations where the result depends on the majority, and not necessarily aligning with one's personal vote.
This sentence seems to be offering a commentary on the nature of voting as a process. The author appears to be suggesting that all voting inherently has an aspect of chance to it, akin to playing a game like checkers or backgammon. They bring up a moral element, implying that voting involves making decisions about what is right and wrong. However, they also note that 'the character of the voters is not staked', suggesting that the individual's personal integrity or morality isn't under threat when one votes. The author accepts the majority's decision, even if it contradicts their own vote, and doesn't feel obligated to make the 'right' choice win.
#SPJ3