Answer:
The sales budget
Jefferson Sports Medicine, Inc budgets sales budget (Amounts in $)
Months
Physical examination July August September Total
Basic physical 13,200 14,100 6,300 33,600
Extended physical 25,650 27,000 14,850 67,500
101,100
Explanation:
The sales expense shows the forecasted of sales from the various types of physical examination for a given period. These include the sales expected from Physical examination. The sales are the products of the charge per examination and the number of examinations conducted. It may be computed as follows;
July;
Physical examination
= $60 * 220
= $13,200
Extended physical
= $135 * 190
= $25,650
August
= $60 * 235
= $14,100
Extended physical
= $135 * 200
= $27,000
September
= $60 * 105
= $6,300
Extended physical
= $135 * 110
= $14,850
Answer:
Rock Inc.
Gross profit ratio:
= 0.70
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Sales $473,864
Cost of Goods Sold 142,263
Gross profit $331,601
Gross profit ratio = Gross profit/Sales
= $331,601/$473,864
= 0.69978
= 0.70
b) Rock's gross profit is the difference between the Sales Revenue and the Cost of Goods Sold. It is the first profit point on the Income Statement. It measures the company's ability to convert sales revenue into profit after accounting for the cost of goods sold. This profit will cover the expenses incurred in running the business for the particular period.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
On July 1
Merchandise Inventory A/c $10,800
To Accounts payable A/c $10,800
(Being goods purchased on credit)
On July 5
Accounts payable A/c Dr $1,500
To Merchandise Inventory A/c $1,500
(Being goods returned)
On July 8
Accounts payable A/c Dr $9,300 ($10,800 - $1,500)
To Cash A/c $9,114
To Merchandise Inventory A/c $186 ($10,800 - $1,500)× 2%
(Being due amount is paid and the remaining balance is credited to the cash account)
B. Recoverability test but not fair value test
C. Not recoverability test but fair value test
D. Neither recoverability test nor fair value test
Answer: The correct answer is "C. Not recoverability test but fair value test".
Explanation: The impairment test to be used is Not recoverability test but fair value test. To determine whether intangibles of indefinite life have deteriorated and must present another value in their balance sheet, they must implement the fair value test.
Answer:
Brand A Q 2.4
Brand B Q 1.2
Explanation:
Using Excel solver:
contrains:
c4 = 60
d4 = 30
solve e4 for min
variable cell b2:b3
a b c d e
Q Protein Fat Cost
Brand A 2.4 36 24 1.92
Brand B 1.2 24 6 0.6
60 30 2.52
Protein = 60
Fat = 30
Firstly, you have to formulate the objective function and constraints by using the given information. After inputting the model into a solver program, the program will provide the values that deliver the minimum value for the objective function that is subject to the constraints. This is a high school level mathematics problem.
In order to form a linear programming model, you would need to define your decision variables, in this case the amount of food from both brands. If we denote the amount of Brand X food by x and the Brand Y food by y, the objective function (the thing you want to minimize, the cost in this case) will be 0.8x + 0.5y. The constraints are the nutritional requirements: 15x + 20y >= 60 for protein, and 10x + 5y >= 30 for fat.
To solve this model using the Solver method, you would input your model into a solver program and find the values of x and y that minimize the objective function while adhering to the constraints. Result will depend on the specific program used.
This problem, by nature, falls under the Mathematics subject matter, as it involves linear algebra and optimization. It's likely a High School/Early College level question as it involves the application of linear programming models to practical real-world problems.
#SPJ12
Answer:
3.08 years
Explanation:
The computation of the payback period is shown below:
Year Cash flows Cumulative cash flows
0 -$5,500 -$5,500
1 $1,525 -$3,975
2 $1,725 -$2,250
3 $2,125 -$125
4 $1,625 $1,500
Now the pay back period is
= 3 years + $125 ÷ $1,625
= 3.08 years
The payback period of the given cash flows is calculated by subtracting each year's cash inflow from the initial investment until the remaining amount is completely paid off. The payback period is found to be approximately 3.08 years.
The Payback Period is a capital budgeting method that calculates the time required to recoup the cost of an investment. In your case, the cash flow starts with an investment of $5,500 at Year 0, followed by cash inflows in subsequent years. Let's calculate the payback period in years.
At the end of Year 3, there is still $125 remaining from the original investment that has not been recouped. We need a part of the Year 4 cash inflow to pay back the rest. Therefore, the payback period in years is: 3 + ($125 / $1,625) = 3.08 years.
#SPJ3