Why were Carthage and Rome continually at war between 264 and 146 BCE?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Carthage and Rome were two of the most powerful countries at the time. The time between 264-146 BCE was call the Punic wars, there was three Punic wars. The first Punic war started with expansion in Sicily (right next to the boot of Italy) Sicily started the first Punic war. Rome was the victor of the first Punic war and put on some big prices on the Carthage government, so Carthage went to Spain to get some silver to pay their debt to Rome. When Hannibal sacked one of Romes allies the Romans demanding to Carthage to hand over Hannibal, when Carthage said no they declared war. Rome again won this war and put some agreement on Carthage government. The third Punic War began after Carthage deviated from its agreement with Rome that it would give up its fleet and refrain from invasions. I'm sorry if this does not make a lot of seance but I will give you some videos to better answer your question. It's kind of hard to cover a century of history so bare with.

If you check out Invicta The First Punic War they did a four part video about the first Punic war. If you check out HistoryMarche they go into Hannibal and the Second Punic War. If you check out Extra History they go over all three wars and talk about the 3rd Punic war. Not much is known about the third Punic war so you won't find a lot of info about it other than Carthage was burned to the ground after several years of besieging it. I tried to answer to the best of my knowledge hope the channels help you if I didn't.


Related Questions

Which of these behaviors is an example of chivalry? farming the land in return for protection/ rescuing someone who is in danger/ taking an oath of loyalty/ to a lord serving in the clergy
In Germany the Weimar Republic was weak from the start
The 25th amendment to the us constitution was important in the 1970s because it
Which diagram shows an effect of henry clay's american system ( ONLY ANSWER IF YOU KNOW)
Which term best describes a Supreme Court that demonstrates a willingness to change public policy by not hesitating to overturn laws made by Congress or by the states?

How did the Stamp Act of 1765 play a part in motivating the movement toward independence in thecolonies? REF: page 36 of American Government

Answers

The Stamp Act of 1765 angered a lot of colonists and made them want independence, as many felt like they were being treated unfairly.

This act caused the colonists to pay taxes on certain paper products under Great Britain's rule. The colonists felt like this was very unfair as they had no say in what was happening, or "taxation without representation." They had nobody in the British Parliament and could not fight for what they wanted, many deemed this unfair.

Great Britain tried to justify this by saying that they were paying for the French and Indian War, which was very expensive, so they needed extra money. They also said that since they were giving the colonists protection by having British troops, so they shouldn't complain about what they were putting taxes on. This didn't matter to the colonists and many of them started to boycott the products that had taxes on them.

The Stamp Act of 1765 really unified the colonists together, as all of them wanted independence from Great Britain and believed they were being treated unfairly. After a while, Great Britain realized that the Stamp Act was hurting many British merchants and was doing more harm than good, so they repealed it.

Who is the author of Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet? A. Francis Drake B. Sir Walter Raleigh C. Edmund Spenser D. William Shakespeare

Answers

That would be D. William Shakespeare
Dang she beat me hear any way William Shakespeare

Libertarians and conservatives were strong critics of many aspects of LBJ's Great Society programs. Why did they think the federal government's activities during this period was better described as coercive federalism" than "cooperative federalism"? What did this critique have to do with "unfunded mandates"?

Answers

Conservatives and Libertarians opposed the Great Society’s program because they believed they surpassed the powers of the federal government which could be considered coercive federalism since the Federal government dictated the policy instead of working as equals with the State governments. Conservatives and Libertarians believed that the Framers designed the Constitution and the Federalist system to be cooperative federalism.

Examine the timeline and answer the question that follows. Based on the information in the timeline, which causal explanation for U.S. involvement in World War II is most likely accurate? September 1, 1939 — Germany invades Poland. September 27, 1940 — Germany, Japan, and the Soviet Union sign a pact stating they will not attack each other and will provide military assistance if attacked by a nation not already involved in the war. December 7, 1941 — Japanese bombers destroy large portions of the U.S. Navy fleet at Pearl Harbor. December 8, 1941 — The United States declares war on Japan. December 11, 1941 — Germany declares war on the United States. December 11, 1941 — The United States declares war on Germany.

Answers

I believe the answer is: The United States entered World War II because Japan attacked its Navy.

Prior to this attack, united states adopt a neutralist approach in its foreign policy, which make them avoid any intervention toward the affairs of other nations as much as possible. When Japanese army attacked the pearl harbour, the support to enter world war II was given by the majority of people.

Based on the information given, the U.S. involvement in World War II was caused by the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. This is the best answer since the next day after the bombing, the U.S. declared war on Japan and then three days later declared war on Germany. All other events did not directly impact the United States which is why they did not immediately enter the war. The bombing was a direct hit on the United States and forced them into the war. Germany declaring war on the United States as due in part to the pact signed by Germany, Japan, and Soviet Union on September 27, 1940.

1. Did any events preceding the South’s secession not contribute to the decision to secede? 2.Which events were most responsible for causing the South to secede?
3.What current events are causing some states to talk about seceding from the Union again?
4.Do those current events compare in any way to the events in the 1800s? Explain your answer.

(Please answer all of them)

Answers

I think for number one their aren't any events that didn't help their was the civil war, slavery, and tariffs they all made the south want to secede from the north side states.The answer to the second question would be lincolns election.For Number 3 it would likely be because of obama's Re-Election though its not as recent as this year but still.For number 4 in a sense I think they sort of do and dont at the same time. It is still about race but not about slavery, though the south was really jealous because they didn't want to let go of their slaves yet the north seemed to be prospering and their slaves where free. They had a problem with the president later down the road when lincoln was elected as they have a problem with obama being elected when he was first elected in 2008.  And the tariffs which are now considered taxes and business taxes are still a problem now. Nobody really likes the thought of having to pay for their business being good or not prospering.

The Essenes were a Jewish sect that looked for the appearance of a savior.

Answers

Answer:

true

Explanation: