Answer:
1 and 2) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
3)
4)
So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of correct answers is not significantly higher than 0.5
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
n=90 represent the random sample taken
X=58 represent the number of correct answers
estimated proportion of correct answers
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
Step 1 and 2: Concepts and formulas to use
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of correct answers is higher than 0.5.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value .
3) Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
4) Statistical decision
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:
So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given we have so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of correct answers is not significantly higher than 0.5
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
The variable of interest is X: the number of correct answers on a true/false test out of 90 questions.
The parameter of interest is p: population proportion of correct answers in a true/false test.
The passing grade is 58/90 correct questions.
The claim is that if the students answer more than half of the answers, then he is not guessing, i.e. if the proportion of correct answers is more than 50%, the student did not guess the answers, symbolically: p>0.5
Then the hypotheses are:
H₀: p ≤ 0.5
H₁: p > 0.5
α: 0.05
since the sample size is large enough, n= 90 questions, you can apply the Central Limit Theorem to approximate the distribution of the sample proportion to normal, p'≈N(p;[p(1-p])/n) and use the standard normal as a statistic:
≈N(0;1)
The sample proportion is the passing grade of the student p': 58/90= 0.64
Then under the null hypothesis the statistic is:
This test is one-tailed (right) and so is the p-value, you can calculate it as:
P(Z≥2.66)= 1 - P(Z<2.66)= 1 - 0.996093= 0.003907
With this p-value, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
Then at a 5% level, there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion of correctly answered questions is greater than 50%, this means that the student didn't guess the answers.
I hope this helps!
C. Let D= -3. Create a sign chart to solve ()≥0 with this value for D. Write your solution in interval notation. Solutions without sign charts will receive a score of zero.
b) Does it make sense to ask if the difference is statisically significante? Can you answer on the basis of the informations given?
c) Repeat b), assuming the percentages are based on independant simple random samples of 1,000 first year college students drawn each year.
Answer:
a. The difference is important but the question does not make sense
b. Yes, it makes sense to ask if the difference is statistically significant.
c. Please check explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question, we identify the following relation;
: = 0
: ≠ 0
a) The difference is important as asked, but the cultural atmosphere difference of over 30 years makes the question somehow not making sense
b) Yes, it makes sense. In order to answer, it is necessary to know the sample size of the year 2000 survey.
We can answer the question on the basis of the information given.
c) We proceed here as follows;
α = 0.05 , = 1.96 ( This is the critical value)
Thus, z = (0.74-0.36)/√(0.36-0.64)/1000 = 25.03
We make the following conclusions; Since 25.03 > 1.96, the null hypothesis is rejected which means that the proportion of people who think being well officially is important has changed since 1970.
Answer: a and b
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
b is the answer very sure
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Betsy
Step-by-step explanation:
UwU