Answer:
False. Trapezoids and parallelograms are both types of quadrilaterals. 4 sided figures. The sum of a quadrilateral's angles is always equal to 360. The sum of a trapezoid's angles, as well as the sum of a parallelogram's angles, will always be equal. I hope this answers your question.
Step-by-step explanation:
What does the confidence interval suggest about the population means?
A. The confidence interval includes 0 which suggests that the two population means might be equal. There doesn't appear to be a significant difference between the mean drying time for paint type A and the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification does not seem to be effective in reducing drying times.
B. The confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the mean drying time for paint type A is greater than the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification seems to be effective in reducing drying times.
C. The confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the two population means might be equal. There doesn't appear to be a significant difference between the mean drying time for paint type A and the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification does not seem to be effective in reducing drying times.
D. The confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the mean drying time for paint type A is smaller than the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification does not seem to be effective in reducing drying times.
This question is not complete, I got the complete one from google as below:
A paint manufacturer made a modification to a paint to speed up its drying time. Independent simple random samples of 11 cans of type A (the original paint) and 9 cans of type B (the modified paint) were selected and applied to similar surfaces. The drying times, in hours, were recorded.
The summary statistics are as follows.
Type A Type B
x1 = 76.3 hrs x2 = 65.1 hrs
s1 = 4.5 hrs s2 = 5.1 hrs
n1 = 11 n2 = 9
The following 98% confidence interval was obtained for μ1 - μ2, the difference between the mean drying time for paint cans of type A and the mean drying time for paint cans of type B:
4.90 hrs < μ1 - μ2 < 17.50 hrs
What does the confidence interval suggest about the population means?
A. The confidence interval includes 0 which suggests that the two population means might be equal. There doesn't appear to be a significant difference between the mean drying time for paint type A and the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification does not seem to be effective in reducing drying times.
B. The confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the mean drying time for paint type A is greater than the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification seems to be effective in reducing drying times.
C. The confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the two population means might be equal. There doesn't appear to be a significant difference between the mean drying time for paint type A and the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification does not seem to be effective in reducing drying times.
D. The confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the mean drying time for paint type A is smaller than the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification does not seem to be effective in reducing drying times.
Answer:
Option B is correct - the confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the mean drying time for paint type A is greater than the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification seems to be effective in reducing drying times.
Step-by-step explanation:
The 98% confidence interval for the difference in mean drying times of the two types of paints is (4.90, 17.50). This implies that Type A takes between 4.90 and 17.50 hours more to dry than type B paint.
Thus, option B is correct - the confidence interval includes only positive values which suggests that the mean drying time for paint type A is greater than the mean drying time for paint type B. The modification seems to be effective in reducing drying times.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplify in steps considering the hierarchy of operations:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Equation of a Line
We can find the equation of a line by using two sets of data. It can be a pair of ordered pairs, or the slope and a point, or the slope and the y-intercept, or many other combinations of appropriate data.
We are given a line
And are required to find a line perpendicular to that line. Let's find the slope of the given line. Solving for y
The coefficient of the x is the slope
The slope of the perpendicular line is the negative reciprocal of m, thus
We know the second line passes through (2,3). That is enough information to find the second equation:
Operating
Simplifying
That is the equation in slope-intercept form. Intercept: y=4
b. –9 + 9i
c. –5 + 9i
d. –5 – 3i
Answer:
d
Step-by-step explanation:
(-7 + 3i) + (2-6i)
=-7 + 3i + 2 -6i
=(-7+2) + (3i -6i)
=-5 -3i
Answer:
(-7+3I)+(2-6I)
= -7+3i+2-6i
= -5-3I
so answer is d ie -5-3i
Answer:
We conclude that the population mean is not equal to 17.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = 17
Sample mean, = 14.12
Sample size, n = 40
Alpha, α = 0.05
Population standard deviation, σ = 4
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
We use Two-tailed z test to perform this hypothesis.
a) Formula:
Putting all the values, we have
b) P-value can be calculated from the standard z-table.
P-value = 0.0000
c) Since the p-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis. Thus, the population mean is not equal to 17
d) Now,
e) Rejection Rule:
We reject the null hypothesis if it is less than lower critical value and greater than the upper critical value
If the z-statistic lies outside the acceptance region which is from -1.96 to +1.96, we reject the null hypothesis.
f) Since the calculated z-stat lies outside the acceptance region, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis. Thus, the population mean is not equal to 17.
The test statistic is -1.78 and the p-value is 0.0761, indicating that we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the population mean is not equal to 17.
The test statistic can be calculated using the formula:
test statistic = (sample mean - population mean) / (population standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))
Plugging in the given values, we get:
test statistic = (14.12 - 17) / (4 / sqrt(40))
Calculating this gives us a test statistic value of -1.78.
The p-value can be calculated using the test statistic. We need to find the probability that a test statistic at least as extreme as -1.78 would occur assuming the null hypothesis is true. Using a standard normal distribution table or software, we find the p-value to be approximately 0.0761.
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level (alpha = 0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we can conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the population mean is not equal to 17.
#SPJ11