Answer:
B. not accurately defined by any of these statements.
Explanation:
An inferior good is defined as one whose the quantity demanded decreases as the income of its consumers increases and vice versa.
Option A is incorrect because the income elasticity for inferior goods is negative and therefore, as the income of the consumers increases, the demand curve shifts to the left.
Option C is incorrect because an inferior good does not necessarily mean a fake good. A good can be inferior but yet meet all the standards for approval by the FDA.
Option D is incorrect. The price and quantity demand for inferior goods, just like normal goods do not vary directly. This is only applicable to luxurious goods.
None of the statements in A, C, and D accurately defined an inferior goods.
Hence, the correct option is B.
Answer:
B. not accurately defined by any of these statements.
Explanation:
Inferior goods are goods whose demand decreases as the consumers income increases. This is different for normal goods in that the more the consumer earns, the more he/she tends to buy.
As such, inferior goods are not necessarily goods that has not been approved by the Federal Food and Drug Administration.
For Inferior goods, prices and quantity demanded do not vary proportionately.
Furthermore, the demand curve for an inferior good shifts out (rightward) when income decreases and shifts in when income increases.
Answer and Explanation :
The presentation is shown below:
As per the data given in the question,
Assets = Liabilities + Equity Revenue - Expenditure = Net income Cash flow
Cash + Acc. Rev.
NA $94,850 NA $94,850 $94,850 NA $94,850 NA
$93,901.5 -$94,850 NA -$948.5 NA -$948.5 -$948.5 $93,901.5
We simply present the transactions on the financial statements
Answer:
C. NPV is the discounted present value of a project's expected future accounting net income at the required return, subtracting the initial investment.
Explanation:
NPV means Net Present Value, this is calculated by computing the present value of cash returns and not the accounting income, as accounting income takes in account non cash items also, although while computing returns the non cash transactions are not considered.
Therefore the chosen statement which states about accounting income less initial investment is false as even in case the project requires additional mid term investment then that is also considered.
Thus, false statement is
Statement C
Answer:
Explanation:
Pretrial Stage - discovery process, finding of facts. ... Trial Stage - seating of the jury, testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs and testimony on behalf of the defendants
Answer:
Pretrial Stage - discovery process, finding of facts. ... Trial Stage - seating of the jury, testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs and testimony on behalf of the defendants.
1. Predetermined Overhead Rate ≈ $160.27
2. Hourly Billing Rate for Tara ≈ $245.73
(1) To compute the predetermined overhead rate, we need to calculate the total cost of services (salary plus overhead) for both appraisers and then divide it by the total billable hours.
Total Overhead Costs = $378,210
Total Salary Costs = Salary of Debbie + Salary of Tara = $150,000 + $81,000
= $231,000
Total Billable Hours = Billable hours of Debbie + Billable hours of Tara
= 2,000 + 1,800
= 3,800
Predetermined Overhead Rate = (Total Overhead Costs + Total Salary Costs) / Total Billable Hours
Predetermined Overhead Rate = ($378,210 + $231,000) / 3,800
Predetermined Overhead Rate = $609,210 / 3,800
Predetermined Overhead Rate ≈ $160.27 (rounded to 2 decimal places)
(2) To compute the hourly billing rate for Debbie and Tara, we'll use the formula:
Hourly Billing Rate = (Total Cost of Services + 20% Markup) / Total Billable Hours
For Debbie:
Total Cost of Services for Debbie = Salary of Debbie + (Predetermined Overhead Rate × Billable hours of Debbie)
Total Cost of Services for Debbie = $150,000 + ($160.27 × 2,000)
Total Cost of Services for Debbie = $470,540.00
Hourly Billing Rate for Debbie = ($470,540.00 + 0.20 × $470,540.00) / 2,000
Hourly Billing Rate for Debbie ≈ $282.32 (rounded to 2 decimal places)
For Tara:
Total Cost of Services for Tara = Salary of Tara + (Predetermined Overhead Rate × Billable hours of Tara)
Total Cost of Services for Tara = $81,000 + ($160.27 × 1,800)
Total Cost of Services for Tara = $369,486.00
Hourly Billing Rate for Tara = ($369,486.00 + 0.20 × $369,486.00) / 1,800
Hourly Billing Rate for Tara ≈ $245.73 (rounded to 2 decimal places)
Learn more about overhead rate here:
#SPJ12
The predetermined overhead rate is found to be 163.77%, and the hourly billing rates for Debbie and Tara (including a 20% markup) are $237.40 and $142.44, respectively.
To calculate the predetermined overhead rate, we need to divide the total overhead costs by the total salary costs of both appraisers. In this case:
Total Overhead Costs = $378,210
Total Salary Costs = Debbie's Salary ($150,000) + Tara's Salary ($81,000) = $231,000
Predetermined Overhead Rate = Total Overhead Costs / Total Salary Costs = $378,210 / $231,000 = 1.6377 or 163.77%
To calculate the hourly billing rate for each appraiser, you add their salary cost per hour, the overhead cost per hour, and then mark up the total cost by 20%. For Debbie:
Debbie's Salary per Hour = $150,000 / 2,000 hours = $75
Debbie's Overhead per Hour = 1.6377 × $75 = $122.83
Total Cost per Hour for Debbie = $75 + $122.83 = $197.83
Hourly Billing Rate for Debbie (with 20% markup) = Total Cost per Hour × 1.20 = $197.83 × 1.20 = $237.40
Similarly, for Tara:
Tara's Salary per Hour = $81,000 / 1,800 hours = $45
Tara's Overhead per Hour = 1.6377 × $45 = $73.70
Total Cost per Hour for Tara = $45 + $73.70 = $118.70
Hourly Billing Rate for Tara (with 20% markup) = Total Cost per Hour × 1.20 = $118.70 × 1.20 = $142.44
Answer:
2019 Tax Impact of Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers
The impact is very minimal with just a reduction of $150 from 2018's $24,550. However, the chained Consumer Price Index (chained CPI) is more progressive than the fixed weighted CPI, as it does not use a fixed bracket of goods.
Explanation:
The chained Consumer Price Index indexes consumer spending, taxes, and Social Security benefits to the rate of inflation. Considered an alternative measurement to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), the Chain-weighted CPI factors in the product substitutions by consumers and other changes in their spending habits, which are unlike the fixed-weighted bracket of goods used by the ordinary CPI.
b. Calculate depreciation expense for 2021 and 2022 using double-declining balance method.
c. Calculate depreciation expense for 2021 and 2022 using units-of-production using hours operated.
Answer:
a. $9,000
b. $22,000 and $11,000
c. $5,220 and $6,660
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense for the two years are shown below:
a) Straight-line method:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($44,000 - $8,000) ÷ (4 years)
= ($36,000) ÷ (4 years)
= $9,000
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life
So, in year 2021 and 2022, the depreciation expense would be $9,000
(b) Double-declining balance method:
First we have to find the depreciation rate which is shown below:
= One ÷ useful life
= 1 ÷ 4
= 25%
Now the rate is double So, 50%
In year 2021, the original cost is $44,000, so the depreciation is $22,000 after applying the 50% depreciation rate
And, in year 2022, the $22,000 × 50% = $11,000. The $22,000 is come from $44,000 - $22,000
(c) Units-of-production method:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (estimated production)
= ($44,000 - $8,000) ÷ (20,000 hours)
= ($36,000) ÷ (20,000 hours
= $1.8 per hours
For the 2021, it would be
= Production hours in 2021 year × depreciation per hour
= 2,900 hours × $1.8
= $5,220
Now for the 2022 year, it would be
= Production hours in 2022 year × depreciation per hour
= 3,700 hours × $1.8
= $6,660